Hannes Schwandt
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Hannes Schwandt has a total of 40 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Janet Currie
Department of Economics, Yale University
4 shared publications - Joachim Winter
University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Bavaria Germany
2 shared publications - Josselin Thuilliez
CES-CNRS, Université Paris 1, Panthéon-Sorbonne, Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne, Maison des Sciences Economiques, 106-112 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
2 shared publications Aline Bütikofer
Department of Economics, Norwegian School of Economics, Bergen, 5045, Norway
1 shared publicationAmelie Wuppermann
Department of Economics, University of Halle, 06108 Halle (Saale), Germany
1 shared publication- Amelie Wuppermann
Faculty of Law, Business & Economics, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 15 August 2023
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 120 (34)
The COVID-19 baby bump in the United States
We use natality microdata covering the universe of US. births for 2015 to 2021 and California births from 2015 through February 2023 to examine childbearing responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. We find that 60% of the 2020 decline in US fertility rates was driven by sharp reductions in births to foreign-born mothers although births to this group comprised only 22% of all US births in 2019. This decline started in January 2020. In contrast, the COVID-19 recession resulted in an overall “baby bump” among US-born mothers, which marked the first reversal in declining fertility rates since the Great Recession. Births to US-born mothers fell by 31,000 in 2020 relative to a prepandemic trend but increased by 71,000 in 2021. The data for California suggest that US births remained elevated through February 2023. The baby bump was most pronounced for first births and women under age 25, suggesting that the pandemic led some women to start families earlier. Above age 25, the baby bump was most pronounced for women aged 30 to 34 and women with a college education. The 2021 to 2022 baby bump is especially remarkable given the large declines in fertility rates that would have been projected by standard statistical models.
- 15 August 2023
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 120 (34)
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessThe COVID-19 baby bump in the United States
We use natality microdata covering the universe of US. births for 2015 to 2021 and California births from 2015 through February 2023 to examine childbearing responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. We find that 60% of the 2020 decline in US fertility rates was driven by sharp reductions in births to foreign-born mothers although births to this group comprised only 22% of all US births in 2019. This decline started in January 2020. In contrast, the COVID-19 recession resulted in an overall “baby bump” among US-born mothers, which marked the first reversal in declining fertility rates since the Great Recession. Births to US-born mothers fell by 31,000 in 2020 relative to a prepandemic trend but increased by 71,000 in 2021. The data for California suggest that US births remained elevated through February 2023. The baby bump was most pronounced for first births and women under age 25, suggesting that the pandemic led some women to start families earlier. Above age 25, the baby bump was most pronounced for women aged 30 to 34 and women with a college education. The 2021 to 2022 baby bump is especially remarkable given the large declines in fertility rates that would have been projected by standard statistical models.
- Open Access
- 7 July 2022
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 328 (4) , 360-366
Changes in the Relationship Between Income and Life Expectancy Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic, California, 2015-2021
The income-health gradient—the positive correlation between income and better health—is widely documented.1-6 Less clear is whether the slope of that gradient changed in recent years, a period during which income inequality widened in the US.
- 7 July 2022
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 328 (4) , 360-366
Open AccessChanges in the Relationship Between Income and Life Expectancy Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic, California, 2015-2021
The income-health gradient—the positive correlation between income and better health—is widely documented.1-6 Less clear is whether the slope of that gradient changed in recent years, a period during which income inequality widened in the US.
- Open Access
- 28 September 2021
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 118 (40)
Inequality in mortality between Black and White Americans by age, place, and cause and in comparison to Europe, 1990 to 2018
Significance: From 1990 to 2018, the Black–White American life expectancy gap fell 48.9% and mortality inequality decreased, although progress stalled after 2012 as life expectancy plateaued. Had improvements continued at the 1990 to 2012 rate, the racial gap in life expectancy would have closed by 2036. Despite decreasing mortality inequality, income-based life expectancy gaps remain starker in the United States than in European countries. At the same time, European mortality improved strongly and even those U.S. populations with the longest life spans–White Americans living in the highest-income areas–experience higher mortality at all ages than Europeans in high-income areas in 2018. Hence, mortality rates of both Black and White Americans could fall much further in both high-income and low-income areas.
- 28 September 2021
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 118 (40)
Open AccessInequality in mortality between Black and White Americans by age, place, and cause and in comparison to Europe, 1990 to 2018
Significance: From 1990 to 2018, the Black–White American life expectancy gap fell 48.9% and mortality inequality decreased, although progress stalled after 2012 as life expectancy plateaued. Had improvements continued at the 1990 to 2012 rate, the racial gap in life expectancy would have closed by 2036. Despite decreasing mortality inequality, income-based life expectancy gaps remain starker in the United States than in European countries. At the same time, European mortality improved strongly and even those U.S. populations with the longest life spans–White Americans living in the highest-income areas–experience higher mortality at all ages than Europeans in high-income areas in 2018. Hence, mortality rates of both Black and White Americans could fall much further in both high-income and low-income areas.
- Open Access
- 1 March 2021
- Published by Wiley in Fiscal Studies
- Vol. 42 (1) , 25-46
Inequality in Mortality: Updated Estimates for the United States, Canada and France*
This study provides comparisons of inequalities in mortality between the United States, Canada and France using the most recent available data. The period between 2010 and 2018 saw increases in mortality and in inequality in mortality for most age and gender groups in the United States. The main exceptions were children under 5 and adults over 65. In contrast, Canada saw a further flattening of mortality gradients in most groups, as well as further declines in overall mortality. The sole exception was Canadian women over 80 years old, who saw small increases in mortality rates. France saw continuing improvements in mortality rates in all groups. Both Canada and France have distributions of mortality that are much more equal than those in the United States, demonstrating the importance of public policy in the achievement of equality in health.
- 1 March 2021
- Published by Wiley in Fiscal Studies
- Vol. 42 (1) , 25-46
Open AccessInequality in Mortality: Updated Estimates for the United States, Canada and France*
This study provides comparisons of inequalities in mortality between the United States, Canada and France using the most recent available data. The period between 2010 and 2018 saw increases in mortality and in inequality in mortality for most age and gender groups in the United States. The main exceptions were children under 5 and adults over 65. In contrast, Canada saw a further flattening of mortality gradients in most groups, as well as further declines in overall mortality. The sole exception was Canadian women over 80 years old, who saw small increases in mortality rates. France saw continuing improvements in mortality rates in all groups. Both Canada and France have distributions of mortality that are much more equal than those in the United States, demonstrating the importance of public policy in the achievement of equality in health.
- Open Access
- 1 March 2021
- Published by Wiley in Fiscal Studies
- Vol. 42 (1) , 147-170
Geographic Inequality in Income and Mortality in Germany*
- 1 March 2021
- Published by Wiley in Fiscal Studies
- Vol. 42 (1) , 147-170
Open AccessGeographic Inequality in Income and Mortality in Germany*
- 8 September 2020
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 117 (38) , 23484-23489
Local exposure to school shootings and youth antidepressant use
Significance: In the last two decades, over 240,000 American students were on school grounds when a gunman opened fire at their school. While public attention often focuses on the victims who were killed, less is known about the impacts of school shootings on surviving youth. This study represents the largest analysis to date of the effects of school shootings on an important indicator of youth mental health: the use of prescription antidepressants. We find that local exposure to fatal school shootings leads to persistent and significant increases in youth antidepressant use. These impacts are smaller in areas with a higher density of mental health providers who focus on behavioral interventions.
- 8 September 2020
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 117 (38) , 23484-23489
Local exposure to school shootings and youth antidepressant use
Significance: In the last two decades, over 240,000 American students were on school grounds when a gunman opened fire at their school. While public attention often focuses on the victims who were killed, less is known about the impacts of school shootings on surviving youth. This study represents the largest analysis to date of the effects of school shootings on an important indicator of youth mental health: the use of prescription antidepressants. We find that local exposure to fatal school shootings leads to persistent and significant increases in youth antidepressant use. These impacts are smaller in areas with a higher density of mental health providers who focus on behavioral interventions.