Michał Wilk
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Michał Wilk has a total of 46 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Sebastian Szmit
Department of Pulmonary Circulation, Thromboembolic Diseases and Cardiology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, European Health Centre, Otwock, Poland
4 shared publicationsAnna Waśko-Grabowska
Department of Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, European Health Centre, Otwock, Poland
3 shared publications- Dawid Sigorski
Department of Oncology, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland; Department of Oncology, Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration with the Warmia-Mazury Oncology Centre, Olsztyn, Poland
3 shared publications - Anna Brodziak
Department of Experimental and Clinical Physiology, Laboratory of Centre for Preclinical Research, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
2 shared publications Cezary Szczylik
Department of Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, European Health Centre, Otwock, Poland
2 shared publicationsIwona Skoneczna
Department of Chemotherapy, Grochowski Hospital, Warsaw, Poland
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
DXA-Derived Total Body Fat Percentage and Serum 25(OH)D in Overweight and Obese Children: A Cross-Sectional Study
Background/Objectives: Lower serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] is common in pediatric overweight and obesity, but it remains unclear whether direct adiposity assessment adds information beyond an age- and sex-adjusted model containing BMI z-score and season. We tested whether DXA-derived total body fat percentage is associated with 25(OH)D and whether it adds explanatory power to that model. Methods: We analyzed cross-sectional data from 768 children/adolescents (10–18 years) with overweight/obesity. Anthropometry was available for all; DXA data for 489. The primary analysis used complete-case DXA data (n = 485). Vitamin D supplementation status was not available. Results: Participants with and without DXA were similar in age, sex, BMI z-score, and serum 25(OH)D, but blood sampling season differed (p < 0.001). Adding DXA-derived body fat percentage to the age- and sex-adjusted base model increased R2 from 0.0498 to 0.0657 (ΔR2 = 0.0159). Within the complete-case DXA subgroup (n = 485), DXA-derived total body fat percentage was inversely associated with 25(OH)D after adjustment for BMI z-score, season, age, and sex (B = −0.265; 95% CI, −0.448 to −0.082; p = 0.005). BMI z-score was significant in the base model but not after adjustment for DXA fat percentage. Conclusions: DXA-derived total body fat percentage added explanatory value for serum 25(OH)D beyond BMI z-score and season, but the incremental gain was small (ΔR2 = 0.0159). The findings are consistent with BMI z-score acting as a less direct proxy for the adiposity compartment that DXA quantifies more specifically. Causal interpretation is precluded by the cross-sectional design, unknown supplementation status, and non-random DXA availability.
Open AccessDXA-Derived Total Body Fat Percentage and Serum 25(OH)D in Overweight and Obese Children: A Cross-Sectional Study
Background/Objectives: Lower serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] is common in pediatric overweight and obesity, but it remains unclear whether direct adiposity assessment adds information beyond an age- and sex-adjusted model containing BMI z-score and season. We tested whether DXA-derived total body fat percentage is associated with 25(OH)D and whether it adds explanatory power to that model. Methods: We analyzed cross-sectional data from 768 children/adolescents (10–18 years) with overweight/obesity. Anthropometry was available for all; DXA data for 489. The primary analysis used complete-case DXA data (n = 485). Vitamin D supplementation status was not available. Results: Participants with and without DXA were similar in age, sex, BMI z-score, and serum 25(OH)D, but blood sampling season differed (p < 0.001). Adding DXA-derived body fat percentage to the age- and sex-adjusted base model increased R2 from 0.0498 to 0.0657 (ΔR2 = 0.0159). Within the complete-case DXA subgroup (n = 485), DXA-derived total body fat percentage was inversely associated with 25(OH)D after adjustment for BMI z-score, season, age, and sex (B = −0.265; 95% CI, −0.448 to −0.082; p = 0.005). BMI z-score was significant in the base model but not after adjustment for DXA fat percentage. Conclusions: DXA-derived total body fat percentage added explanatory value for serum 25(OH)D beyond BMI z-score and season, but the incremental gain was small (ΔR2 = 0.0159). The findings are consistent with BMI z-score acting as a less direct proxy for the adiposity compartment that DXA quantifies more specifically. Causal interpretation is precluded by the cross-sectional design, unknown supplementation status, and non-random DXA availability.
- Open Access
- 29 November 2022
- Published by SAGE Publications in Cancer Control
- Vol. 29
Cardiac Biomarkers and Geriatric Assessment in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer During Abiraterone Acetate Therapy – A Cardio-Oncology Study
Background: Abiraterone acetate (AA) is a drug used in advanced prostate cancer. However, known clinical factors with predictive and prognostic value are scarce. This study evaluated cardiovascular (CV) factors and geriatric scales as potential markers of superior response during AA therapy. Methods: This is a prospective observational study. Serum levels of high sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT), D-dimer, NT-proBNP and left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) were used for CV evaluation. Questionnaires of G8, VES-13, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (iADL), and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) were included in the geriatric screening assessment. All measures were taken before AA initiation. Survival curves and Cox proportional hazard models (univariate and multivariate) were used to determine the predictors for a longer time to treatment failure (TTF). Results: Forty nine patients were included in the study. Overall median TTF was 7.9 months (95% CI: 5.9-12.4). In univariate analysis, factors associated with inferior TTF were ( P-value < .05): visceral metastases - HR 2.34; 95% CI: 1.24-4.45, history of coronary artery disease - HR 3.02; 95% CI: 1.19-7.66; LVEF < 50% - HR 2.53; 95% CI: 1.03-6.17; P = .041; age-adjusted D-dimer > upper reference limit (URL) - HR 3.53; 95% CI: 1.81-6.85; P < .001; hsTnT > URL - HR 2.17; 95% CI: 1.13-4.16; P = .016; NT-proBNP ≥ 300 pg/mL - HR 2.3; 95% CI: 1.22-4.34; P = .01; G8 score ≤14 points - HR 2.47; 95% CI: 1.29-4.74; P = .007. In multivariate analysis, age-adjusted D-dimer > URL, G8 score ≤ 14 points and visceral metastases remained statistically significant in prediction of inferior TTF. The number of these factors was associated with shorter median TTF: 0-1 factor – 14.1 months; 2 factors – 5.9 months; 3 factors – 2.7 months; P < .001, log-rank). Conclusions: Age-adjusted D-dimer, and geriatric G8 scores may predict TTF in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer during AA therapy. These observations require further study in a larger population.
- 29 November 2022
- Published by SAGE Publications in Cancer Control
- Vol. 29
Open AccessCardiac Biomarkers and Geriatric Assessment in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer During Abiraterone Acetate Therapy – A Cardio-Oncology Study
Background: Abiraterone acetate (AA) is a drug used in advanced prostate cancer. However, known clinical factors with predictive and prognostic value are scarce. This study evaluated cardiovascular (CV) factors and geriatric scales as potential markers of superior response during AA therapy. Methods: This is a prospective observational study. Serum levels of high sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT), D-dimer, NT-proBNP and left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) were used for CV evaluation. Questionnaires of G8, VES-13, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (iADL), and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) were included in the geriatric screening assessment. All measures were taken before AA initiation. Survival curves and Cox proportional hazard models (univariate and multivariate) were used to determine the predictors for a longer time to treatment failure (TTF). Results: Forty nine patients were included in the study. Overall median TTF was 7.9 months (95% CI: 5.9-12.4). In univariate analysis, factors associated with inferior TTF were ( P-value < .05): visceral metastases - HR 2.34; 95% CI: 1.24-4.45, history of coronary artery disease - HR 3.02; 95% CI: 1.19-7.66; LVEF < 50% - HR 2.53; 95% CI: 1.03-6.17; P = .041; age-adjusted D-dimer > upper reference limit (URL) - HR 3.53; 95% CI: 1.81-6.85; P < .001; hsTnT > URL - HR 2.17; 95% CI: 1.13-4.16; P = .016; NT-proBNP ≥ 300 pg/mL - HR 2.3; 95% CI: 1.22-4.34; P = .01; G8 score ≤14 points - HR 2.47; 95% CI: 1.29-4.74; P = .007. In multivariate analysis, age-adjusted D-dimer > URL, G8 score ≤ 14 points and visceral metastases remained statistically significant in prediction of inferior TTF. The number of these factors was associated with shorter median TTF: 0-1 factor – 14.1 months; 2 factors – 5.9 months; 3 factors – 2.7 months; P < .001, log-rank). Conclusions: Age-adjusted D-dimer, and geriatric G8 scores may predict TTF in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer during AA therapy. These observations require further study in a larger population.
- Open Access
Attitudes of Patients with Cancer towards Vaccinations—Results of Online Survey with Special Focus on the Vaccination against COVID-19
Recently developed COVID-19 vaccines significantly reduce the risk of severe coronavirus disease, which is essential in the particularly vulnerable cancer patient population. There is a growing anti-vaccine concern that may affect the success of the fight against the SARS-CoV2 pandemic. To evaluate opinions and attitudes toward vaccination, we conducted an anonymous online survey among Polish patients diagnosed with cancer. We analyzed how socio-demographic factors, type of cancer, comorbidities, previous influenza vaccinations, and information sources affect the general willingness and opinions about vaccinations, emphasizing vaccination against COVID-19. Six hundred thirty-five patients (80.2% female) participated in the study. A positive attitude towards vaccination was presented by 73.7%, neutral by 17.8%, while negative by 8.5%. Willingness to get vaccinated was declared by 60.3%, 23.5% were unwilling, and 16.2% were undecided. Significant predictors of willingness were education, marital status, active anti-cancer treatment, previous influenza vaccination, and positive attitude towards vaccinations. Patients with cancer have concerns regarding safety, effectiveness, and the process of development of the COVID-19 vaccine. Overall, patients with cancer present positive attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination but required sufficient information on its efficacy and side effects.
Open AccessAttitudes of Patients with Cancer towards Vaccinations—Results of Online Survey with Special Focus on the Vaccination against COVID-19
Recently developed COVID-19 vaccines significantly reduce the risk of severe coronavirus disease, which is essential in the particularly vulnerable cancer patient population. There is a growing anti-vaccine concern that may affect the success of the fight against the SARS-CoV2 pandemic. To evaluate opinions and attitudes toward vaccination, we conducted an anonymous online survey among Polish patients diagnosed with cancer. We analyzed how socio-demographic factors, type of cancer, comorbidities, previous influenza vaccinations, and information sources affect the general willingness and opinions about vaccinations, emphasizing vaccination against COVID-19. Six hundred thirty-five patients (80.2% female) participated in the study. A positive attitude towards vaccination was presented by 73.7%, neutral by 17.8%, while negative by 8.5%. Willingness to get vaccinated was declared by 60.3%, 23.5% were unwilling, and 16.2% were undecided. Significant predictors of willingness were education, marital status, active anti-cancer treatment, previous influenza vaccination, and positive attitude towards vaccinations. Patients with cancer have concerns regarding safety, effectiveness, and the process of development of the COVID-19 vaccine. Overall, patients with cancer present positive attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination but required sufficient information on its efficacy and side effects.
- Open Access
- 1 April 2021
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Oncology
- Vol. 11
Angiotensin System Inhibitors May Improve Outcomes of Patients With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer During Abiraterone Acetate Treatment—A Cardio-Oncology Study
Background: Abiraterone acetate (ABI) therapy improves overall survival in metastatic prostate cancer (PC) patients; however, this effect may be diminished by concurrent comorbidities. We aimed to evaluate the influence of pre-existing chronic diseases and concomitant medications on the course of ABI treatment among post-chemotherapy patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients (mCRPC). Methods: From the Polish National Health Fund database, we identified 93 post-chemotherapy, mCRPC patients, who were qualified for ABI treatment in our oncology center between 2014 and 2018. Survival curves and Cox proportional hazard models (univariate and multivariate) were used to determine the predictors for longer time to treatment failure (TTF) of ABI therapy. Results: Median TTF was 9,8 months (IQR: 0,6–56,5) Factors associated with longer TTF were: well controlled hypertension (HR, 0.59; 95% CI. 0.38–0.90; p = 0.02), stable coronary artery disease (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.33–0.95; p=0.03), the use of angiotensin system inhibitor (ASi) (HR, 0.61; 95% CI 0.4–0.94; p = 0,02). Patients who were receiving ASi had median TTF of 12.2 months versus 5.8 months in men who did not receive ASi before ABI initiation. At the start of ABI therapy, the aforementioned groups did not differ in terms of well-known prognostic factors: Gleason score, PSA level, or the number of patients with visceral metastases. In a multivariate analysis, the use of ASi remained statistically significant, even after adjustment for well-known oncological factors (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34–0.98; p = 0.04). Conclusions: The use of ASi may enhance and prolong ABI therapy in post-docetaxel mCRPC patients and may potentially be considered a new, non-oncological, predictive factor for longer TTF. This association requires a prospective validation.
- 1 April 2021
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Oncology
- Vol. 11
Open AccessAngiotensin System Inhibitors May Improve Outcomes of Patients With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer During Abiraterone Acetate Treatment—A Cardio-Oncology Study
Background: Abiraterone acetate (ABI) therapy improves overall survival in metastatic prostate cancer (PC) patients; however, this effect may be diminished by concurrent comorbidities. We aimed to evaluate the influence of pre-existing chronic diseases and concomitant medications on the course of ABI treatment among post-chemotherapy patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients (mCRPC). Methods: From the Polish National Health Fund database, we identified 93 post-chemotherapy, mCRPC patients, who were qualified for ABI treatment in our oncology center between 2014 and 2018. Survival curves and Cox proportional hazard models (univariate and multivariate) were used to determine the predictors for longer time to treatment failure (TTF) of ABI therapy. Results: Median TTF was 9,8 months (IQR: 0,6–56,5) Factors associated with longer TTF were: well controlled hypertension (HR, 0.59; 95% CI. 0.38–0.90; p = 0.02), stable coronary artery disease (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.33–0.95; p=0.03), the use of angiotensin system inhibitor (ASi) (HR, 0.61; 95% CI 0.4–0.94; p = 0,02). Patients who were receiving ASi had median TTF of 12.2 months versus 5.8 months in men who did not receive ASi before ABI initiation. At the start of ABI therapy, the aforementioned groups did not differ in terms of well-known prognostic factors: Gleason score, PSA level, or the number of patients with visceral metastases. In a multivariate analysis, the use of ASi remained statistically significant, even after adjustment for well-known oncological factors (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34–0.98; p = 0.04). Conclusions: The use of ASi may enhance and prolong ABI therapy in post-docetaxel mCRPC patients and may potentially be considered a new, non-oncological, predictive factor for longer TTF. This association requires a prospective validation.
- Open Access
- 22 December 2020
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Pharmacology
- Vol. 11
Cardiovascular Complications of Prostate Cancer Treatment
Treatment of prostate cancer (PC) is a rapidly evolving field of pharmacology research. In recent years, numerous novel therapeutics that improve survival and ameliorate disease control have been approved. Currently, the systemic treatment for prostate neoplasm consists of hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiopharmaceuticals, targeted therapy, and supportive agents (e.g., related to bone health). Unfortunately, many of them carry a risk of cardiovascular complications, which occasionally pose a higher mortality threat than cancer itself. This article provides a unique and comprehensive overview of the prevalence and possible mechanisms of cardiovascular toxicities of all PC therapies, including state-of-the-art antineoplastic agents. Additionally, this article summarizes available recommendations regarding screening and prevention of the most common cardiac complications among patients with advanced cancer disease.
- 22 December 2020
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Pharmacology
- Vol. 11
Open AccessCardiovascular Complications of Prostate Cancer Treatment
Treatment of prostate cancer (PC) is a rapidly evolving field of pharmacology research. In recent years, numerous novel therapeutics that improve survival and ameliorate disease control have been approved. Currently, the systemic treatment for prostate neoplasm consists of hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiopharmaceuticals, targeted therapy, and supportive agents (e.g., related to bone health). Unfortunately, many of them carry a risk of cardiovascular complications, which occasionally pose a higher mortality threat than cancer itself. This article provides a unique and comprehensive overview of the prevalence and possible mechanisms of cardiovascular toxicities of all PC therapies, including state-of-the-art antineoplastic agents. Additionally, this article summarizes available recommendations regarding screening and prevention of the most common cardiac complications among patients with advanced cancer disease.
- 17 September 2020
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
- Vol. 10 (4) , 404-410
Exercise interventions in metastatic cancer disease: a literature review and a brief discussion on current and future perspectives
Exercise is a well-established factor which improves outcomes of oncological patients during curative treatment as well as in cancer survivors. However, the role of physical activity in metastatic disease, due to the deficiency of high-level evidence from prospective clinical trials, remains a partially unexplored field of research. Additionally, no specific guidelines related to exercise for persons with advanced cancer have been developed so far. Unfortunately, this research deficit may effectively prevent physicians from prescribing adequate and safe recommendations on physical activity to their patients. In an attempt to fill this gap in clinical practice, we present here an up-to-date review of potential benefits of exercise interventions in relation to the survival, quality of life and supportive care for patients with metastatic cancer. We also review the data on the safety of physical activity with special emphasis on elderly populations or individuals with bone metastases. Finally, we discuss the most relevant clinical factors that should be considered during exercise qualification. In conclusion, physical activity is an important tool for improving the outcomes of people undergoing anticancer therapy for metastatic disease. However, the training should be tailored individually to the patient’s functional status, comorbidities and preferences. Physical activity should become a standard component of every metastatic cancer care plan.
- 17 September 2020
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
- Vol. 10 (4) , 404-410
Exercise interventions in metastatic cancer disease: a literature review and a brief discussion on current and future perspectives
Exercise is a well-established factor which improves outcomes of oncological patients during curative treatment as well as in cancer survivors. However, the role of physical activity in metastatic disease, due to the deficiency of high-level evidence from prospective clinical trials, remains a partially unexplored field of research. Additionally, no specific guidelines related to exercise for persons with advanced cancer have been developed so far. Unfortunately, this research deficit may effectively prevent physicians from prescribing adequate and safe recommendations on physical activity to their patients. In an attempt to fill this gap in clinical practice, we present here an up-to-date review of potential benefits of exercise interventions in relation to the survival, quality of life and supportive care for patients with metastatic cancer. We also review the data on the safety of physical activity with special emphasis on elderly populations or individuals with bone metastases. Finally, we discuss the most relevant clinical factors that should be considered during exercise qualification. In conclusion, physical activity is an important tool for improving the outcomes of people undergoing anticancer therapy for metastatic disease. However, the training should be tailored individually to the patient’s functional status, comorbidities and preferences. Physical activity should become a standard component of every metastatic cancer care plan.
- Open Access
Impact of COVID-19 on anxiety levels among patients with cancer actively treated with systemic therapy
Background Life-threatening diseases have a negative impact on emotional well-being and psychosocial functioning. This study aimed to assess the relationship between the level of anxiety caused by a neoplasm and the threat of coronavirus infection among patients with cancer actively treated with systemic therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, we searched for clinical factors associated with a higher level of anxiety. Methods In this multicentre, prospective, non-interventional study conducted in Poland, we enrolled 306 actively treated patients with cancer and collected their clinical data, including age, gender, cancer type and treatment intention. The fear/anxiety of SARS-CoV-2 were rated in Fear of COVID-19 Scale (SRA-FCV-19S) and Numerical Anxiety Scale (SRA-NAS). The fear and anxiety associated with cancer (CRA) were rated with the NAS (CRA-NAS). Results The mean level of SRA-FCV-19S was 18.5±7.44, which was correlated with the SRA-NAS (r=0.741, pConclusions For an actively treated patient with cancer, cancer remains the main life-threatening disease during the COVID-19 pandemic. The need for more attentive psychological care should be provided especially to female patients, patients with breast cancer, those under 65 years of age and treated with curative intention, as these factors are associated with a higher level of anxiety.
Open AccessImpact of COVID-19 on anxiety levels among patients with cancer actively treated with systemic therapy
Background Life-threatening diseases have a negative impact on emotional well-being and psychosocial functioning. This study aimed to assess the relationship between the level of anxiety caused by a neoplasm and the threat of coronavirus infection among patients with cancer actively treated with systemic therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, we searched for clinical factors associated with a higher level of anxiety. Methods In this multicentre, prospective, non-interventional study conducted in Poland, we enrolled 306 actively treated patients with cancer and collected their clinical data, including age, gender, cancer type and treatment intention. The fear/anxiety of SARS-CoV-2 were rated in Fear of COVID-19 Scale (SRA-FCV-19S) and Numerical Anxiety Scale (SRA-NAS). The fear and anxiety associated with cancer (CRA) were rated with the NAS (CRA-NAS). Results The mean level of SRA-FCV-19S was 18.5±7.44, which was correlated with the SRA-NAS (r=0.741, pConclusions For an actively treated patient with cancer, cancer remains the main life-threatening disease during the COVID-19 pandemic. The need for more attentive psychological care should be provided especially to female patients, patients with breast cancer, those under 65 years of age and treated with curative intention, as these factors are associated with a higher level of anxiety.
- 27 February 2018
- Published by International Institute of Anticancer Research in In Vivo
- Vol. 32 (2) , 373-379
Determinants of Survival After Emergency Intrapericardial Cisplatin Treatment in Cancer Patients with Recurrent Hemodynamic Instability After Pericardiocentesis
Background: Pericardial effusion is associated with high mortality in oncology. The etiology of infectious pericarditis and iatrogenic effects of previous radio-/chemotherapy may be always suspected, especially when a subsequent episode is observed. Patients and Methods: The study included 17 hemodynamically-unstable patients with cancer due to recurrent pericardial bloody effusion after previous pericardiocentesis and analyzed survival determinants after intrapericardial chemotherapy with cisplatin. Results: The mortality rate was not significantly associated with the level of N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide, low hemoglobin (104/μl), large volume (>1500 ml) and long duration (>8 days) of pericardial drainage, cardiac arrhythmias, positive culture test results nor fever occurring during cisplatin administration. Subsequent systemic anticancer therapy was the strongest factor determining a longer survival (hazard ratio(HR)=0.31, 95% confidence interval(CI)=0.11-0.9; p=0.03). Conclusion: Efficacy of rescue intrapericardial chemotherapy with cisplatin is independent of parameters of hemodynamic instability and levels of inflammatory markers in recurrent pericardial effusion.
- 27 February 2018
- Published by International Institute of Anticancer Research in In Vivo
- Vol. 32 (2) , 373-379
Determinants of Survival After Emergency Intrapericardial Cisplatin Treatment in Cancer Patients with Recurrent Hemodynamic Instability After Pericardiocentesis
Background: Pericardial effusion is associated with high mortality in oncology. The etiology of infectious pericarditis and iatrogenic effects of previous radio-/chemotherapy may be always suspected, especially when a subsequent episode is observed. Patients and Methods: The study included 17 hemodynamically-unstable patients with cancer due to recurrent pericardial bloody effusion after previous pericardiocentesis and analyzed survival determinants after intrapericardial chemotherapy with cisplatin. Results: The mortality rate was not significantly associated with the level of N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide, low hemoglobin (104/μl), large volume (>1500 ml) and long duration (>8 days) of pericardial drainage, cardiac arrhythmias, positive culture test results nor fever occurring during cisplatin administration. Subsequent systemic anticancer therapy was the strongest factor determining a longer survival (hazard ratio(HR)=0.31, 95% confidence interval(CI)=0.11-0.9; p=0.03). Conclusion: Efficacy of rescue intrapericardial chemotherapy with cisplatin is independent of parameters of hemodynamic instability and levels of inflammatory markers in recurrent pericardial effusion.