Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Olga Bednova has a total of 14 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Integrating Biochemical and Computational Approaches Reveal Structural Insights in Trastuzumab scFv-Fc Antibody Engineering

    by Olga Bednova, Jessica Pougoue Ketchemen, Hazem Mslati, Mark Barok, Heikki Joensuu, Natalie Zeytuni, Francesco Gentile, Leon Sanche, Humphrey Fonge, Jeffrey Victor Leyton

    Antibody-based agents have become a preferred treatment for various diseases, including cancer, due to significant advances in antibody engineering. The use of single-chain Fv-Fcs (scFv-Fcs) has been a promising engineering approach for therapeutic design. The concept is that the Fc provides increased stability and target binding and ultimately improves performance. However, the structural and dynamic relationship between the variable and Fc domains, which are fused in close proximity, and the impact on stability and target binding are not well understood. This study evaluated trastuzumab-derived scFv-Fc antibodies, focusing on the impact of their design on important biopharmaceutical parameters. Computational modelling and molecular dynamics, alongside experimental studies, were used to ascertain their dynamics, expression and purification, stabilities, and binding potencies. The results showed that the scFv subunits exhibited stochastic interplays that lead to diverse shapes and were associated with functional performance. This new understanding of scFv-Fc antibodies and their structural and functional nuances provides important details to further guide the design of more effective and less toxic therapeutics.


  • Nuclear localization signal-tagged systems: relevant nuclear import principles in the context of current therapeutic design

    by Ritabrita Goswami, Aarohi Gupta, Olga Bednova, Gaël Coulombe, Dipika Patel, Vincent M. Rotello, Jeffrey V. Leyton

    Nuclear targeting of therapeutics provides a strategy for enhancing efficacy of molecules active in the nucleus and minimizing off-target effects.


  • Open Access

    Targeted Molecular Therapeutics for Bladder Cancer—A New Option beyond the Mixed Fortunes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors?

    by Olga Bednova, Jeffrey V. Leyton

    The fact that there are now five immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monoclonal antibodies approved since 2016 that target programmed cell death protein 1 or programmed death ligand-1 for the treatment of metastatic and refractory bladder cancer is an outstanding achievement. Although patients can display pronounced responses that extend survival when treated with ICIs, the main benefit of these drugs compared to traditional chemotherapy is that they are better tolerated and result in reduced adverse events (AEs). Unfortunately, response rates to ICI treatment are relatively low and, these drugs are expensive and have a high economic burden. As a result, their clinical efficacy/cost-value relationship is debated. Long sought after targeted molecular therapeutics have now emerged and are boasting impressive response rates in heavily pre-treated, including ICI treated, patients with metastatic bladder cancer. The antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) enfortumab vedotin (EV) and sacituzumab govitecan (SG) have demonstrated the ability to provide objective response rates (ORRs) of 44% and 31% in patients with bladder tumor cells that express Nectin-4 and Trop-2, respectively. As a result, EV was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic bladder cancer who have previously received ICI and platinum-containing chemotherapy. SG has been granted fast track designation. The small molecule Erdafitinib was recently approved for the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic bladder cancer with genetic alterations in fibroblast growth factor receptors that have previously been treated with a platinum-containing chemotherapy. Erdafitinib achieved an ORR of 40% in patients including a proportion who had previously received ICI therapy. In addition, these targeted drugs are sufficiently tolerated or AEs can be appropriately managed. Hence, the early performance in clinical effectiveness of these targeted drugs are substantially increased relative to ICIs. In this article, the most up to date follow-ups on treatment efficacy and AEs of the ICIs and targeted therapeutics are described. In addition, drug price and cost-effectiveness are described. For best overall value taking into account clinical effectiveness, price and cost-effectiveness, results favor avelumab and atezolizumab for ICIs. Although therapeutically promising, it is too early to determine if the described targeted therapeutics provide the best overall value as cost-effectiveness analyses have yet to be performed and long-term follow-ups are needed. Nonetheless, with the arrival of targeted molecular therapeutics and their increased effectiveness relative to ICIs, creates a potential novel paradigm based on ‘targeting’ for affecting clinical practice for metastatic bladder cancer treatment.