Kyoung Ho Yoon
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Kyoung Ho Yoon has a total of 22 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Dae Kyung Bae
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul Sacred Heart General Hospital, Seoul, Korea
3 shared publications - Jae-Young Park
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery CHA University, CHA Bundang Medical Center Seongnam Republic of Korea
3 shared publications - Hee Sung Lee
Department of Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
2 shared publications - Sang-Gyun Kim
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
2 shared publications Seon Goo Kim
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sejong Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
2 shared publications- Cheol Hee Park
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 1 January 2024
- Published by XMLink in Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery
- Vol. 16 (2) , 275-285
Collagen Meniscal Scaffold Implantation Can Provide Meniscal Regeneration in Asian Patients with Partial Meniscal Defects: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study with Three-Dimensional Volume Analysis of the Meniscus
Yoon KH, et al. Clin Orthop Surg. 2024 Apr;16(2):275-285. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios24062
- 1 January 2024
- Published by XMLink in Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery
- Vol. 16 (2) , 275-285
Open AccessCollagen Meniscal Scaffold Implantation Can Provide Meniscal Regeneration in Asian Patients with Partial Meniscal Defects: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study with Three-Dimensional Volume Analysis of the Meniscus
Yoon KH, et al. Clin Orthop Surg. 2024 Apr;16(2):275-285. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios24062
- Open Access
- 1 January 2024
- Published by XMLink in Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery
- Vol. 16 (1) , 57-65
A Comparison of Results in Older, Middle-aged, and Younger Patients after Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Minimum 10-Year Follow-up
Yoon KH, et al. Clin Orthop Surg. 2023 Sep;15:e65. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios22344
- 1 January 2024
- Published by XMLink in Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery
- Vol. 16 (1) , 57-65
Open AccessA Comparison of Results in Older, Middle-aged, and Younger Patients after Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Minimum 10-Year Follow-up
Yoon KH, et al. Clin Orthop Surg. 2023 Sep;15:e65. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios22344
- Open Access
- 1 January 2023
- Published by XMLink in Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery
- Vol. 15 (6) , 928-934
The Effect of Aging on Outcomes after Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Older (≥ 50 Years) Versus Younger (< 50 Years) Patients
Yoon KH, et al. Clin Orthop Surg. 2022 Dec;14:e105. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios22102
- 1 January 2023
- Published by XMLink in Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery
- Vol. 15 (6) , 928-934
Open AccessThe Effect of Aging on Outcomes after Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Older (≥ 50 Years) Versus Younger (< 50 Years) Patients
Yoon KH, et al. Clin Orthop Surg. 2022 Dec;14:e105. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios22102
- 7 December 2022
- Published by Wiley in Arthroscopy
- Vol. 39 (5) , 1254-1261
Outcomes of Arthroscopic All‐Inside Repair Are Improved Compared to Transtibial Pull‐Out Repair of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears
Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent an all‐inside repair (with a bony trough) versus transtibial pull‐out repair in medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs). Methods: We retrospectively investigated consecutive patients who underwent MMPRT repairs in nonacute tears in age over 40 from November 2015 to June 2019. All patients were divided into a transtibial pull‐out repair group and an all‐inside repair group. Different surgical techniques were used during different time frames. All patients were followed‐up for a minimum of 2 years. The data collected included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective, Lysholm, and Tegner activity scores. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at the 1‐year follow‐up to assess meniscus extrusion, signal intensity, and healing. Results: The final cohort consisted of 28 patients in the all‐inside repair group and 16 in the transtibial pull‐out repair group. In the all‐inside repair group, the IKDC Subjective, Lysholm, and Tegner scores improved significantly at the 2‐year follow‐up. In the transtibial pull‐out repair group, the IKDC Subjective, Lysholm, and Tegner scores did not improve significantly at the 2‐year follow‐up. Postoperative extrusion ratio increased in both groups, and patient‐reported outcomes at follow‐up did not differ between the two groups The change in the extrusion ratio was significantly less in the all‐inside repair group ( P = .009), as was the postoperative meniscus signal ( P = .011). Postoperative MRI revealed significantly better healing in the all‐inside group ( P = .041). Conclusion: All‐inside repair improved the functional outcome scores. Radiologically, all‐inside repair was better than transtibial pull‐out repair. All‐inside repair may be a viable MMPRT treatment option. Level of Evidence: III, retrospective cohort study.
- 7 December 2022
- Published by Wiley in Arthroscopy
- Vol. 39 (5) , 1254-1261
Outcomes of Arthroscopic All‐Inside Repair Are Improved Compared to Transtibial Pull‐Out Repair of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears
Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent an all‐inside repair (with a bony trough) versus transtibial pull‐out repair in medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs). Methods: We retrospectively investigated consecutive patients who underwent MMPRT repairs in nonacute tears in age over 40 from November 2015 to June 2019. All patients were divided into a transtibial pull‐out repair group and an all‐inside repair group. Different surgical techniques were used during different time frames. All patients were followed‐up for a minimum of 2 years. The data collected included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective, Lysholm, and Tegner activity scores. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at the 1‐year follow‐up to assess meniscus extrusion, signal intensity, and healing. Results: The final cohort consisted of 28 patients in the all‐inside repair group and 16 in the transtibial pull‐out repair group. In the all‐inside repair group, the IKDC Subjective, Lysholm, and Tegner scores improved significantly at the 2‐year follow‐up. In the transtibial pull‐out repair group, the IKDC Subjective, Lysholm, and Tegner scores did not improve significantly at the 2‐year follow‐up. Postoperative extrusion ratio increased in both groups, and patient‐reported outcomes at follow‐up did not differ between the two groups The change in the extrusion ratio was significantly less in the all‐inside repair group ( P = .009), as was the postoperative meniscus signal ( P = .011). Postoperative MRI revealed significantly better healing in the all‐inside group ( P = .041). Conclusion: All‐inside repair improved the functional outcome scores. Radiologically, all‐inside repair was better than transtibial pull‐out repair. All‐inside repair may be a viable MMPRT treatment option. Level of Evidence: III, retrospective cohort study.
- Open Access
- 1 January 2020
- Published by The Korean Orthopaedic Association in Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
- Vol. 55 (2) , 127-134
Comparison of Gap Pressure in Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy versus Compressive Strength of Allogenous Wedge Bone Blocks
윤경호, et al. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2020 Feb;55(2):127-134. https://doi.org/10.4055/jkoa.2020.55.2.127
- 1 January 2020
- Published by The Korean Orthopaedic Association in Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
- Vol. 55 (2) , 127-134
Open AccessComparison of Gap Pressure in Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy versus Compressive Strength of Allogenous Wedge Bone Blocks
윤경호, et al. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2020 Feb;55(2):127-134. https://doi.org/10.4055/jkoa.2020.55.2.127
- 1 October 2010
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Arthroplasty
- Vol. 25 (7) , 1131-1136
The Position of the Tibial Component Affecting the Postoperative Mechanical Axis in Total Knee Arthroplasty
- 1 October 2010
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Arthroplasty
- Vol. 25 (7) , 1131-1136
The Position of the Tibial Component Affecting the Postoperative Mechanical Axis in Total Knee Arthroplasty
- Open Access
- 1 January 2007
- Published by The Korean Orthopaedic Association in Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
- Vol. 42 (2) , 227-235
Comparison of Radiologic Measurements of Total Knee Replacement using Computer-assisted Navigation System and Conventional System in Varus Deformity of the Knee
Bae DK, et al. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2007 Apr;42(2):227-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/jkoa.2007.42.2.227
- 1 January 2007
- Published by The Korean Orthopaedic Association in Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
- Vol. 42 (2) , 227-235
Open AccessComparison of Radiologic Measurements of Total Knee Replacement using Computer-assisted Navigation System and Conventional System in Varus Deformity of the Knee
Bae DK, et al. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2007 Apr;42(2):227-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/jkoa.2007.42.2.227
- 1 January 2006
- Published by The Korean Orthopaedic Association in Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
- Vol. 41 (2) , 233-238
Structural Allograft for Management of Severe Bone Defectin Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
Bae DK, et al. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2006 Apr;41(2):233-238. https://doi.org/10.4055/jkoa.2006.41.2.233
- 1 January 2006
- Published by The Korean Orthopaedic Association in Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
- Vol. 41 (2) , 233-238
Structural Allograft for Management of Severe Bone Defectin Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
Bae DK, et al. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2006 Apr;41(2):233-238. https://doi.org/10.4055/jkoa.2006.41.2.233