DSDebbie S. Sakai

Debbie S. Sakai

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Debbie S. Sakai has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Brad Monash

    S.M. Harman is clinical associate professor, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; ORCID: http://orcid.org/

    1 shared publication
  • Eric Huynh

    S.M. Harman is clinical associate professor, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; ORCID: http://orcid.org/

    1 shared publication
  • For The Patient Engagement Project

    S.M. Harman is clinical associate professor, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; ORCID: http://orcid.org/

    1 shared publication
  • Ian Chua

    S.M. Harman is clinical associate professor, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; ORCID: http://orcid.org/

    1 shared publication
  • Jason M. Satterfield

    School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States

    1 shared publication
  • Joan F. Hilton

    University of California San Francisco Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics San Francisco, CA

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Promoting Shared Decision-Making Behaviors During Inpatient Rounds: A Multimodal Educational Intervention

    by Stephanie M. Harman, Rebecca Blankenburg, Jason M. Satterfield, Brad Monash, Stephanie Rennke, Patrick Yuan, Debbie S. Sakai, Eric Huynh, Ian Chua, Joan F. ScD Hilton, et al.

    Purpose: To estimate the effectiveness of a multimodal educational intervention to increase use of shared decision-making (SDM) behaviors by inpatient pediatric and internal medicine hospitalists and trainees at teaching hospitals at Stanford University and the University of California, San Francisco. Method: The 8-week Patient Engagement Project Study intervention, delivered at four services between November 2014 and January 2015, included workshops, campaign messaging, report cards, and coaching. For 12-week pre- and postintervention periods, clinician peers used the nine-point Rochester Participatory Decision-Making Scale (RPAD) to evaluate rounding teams’ SDM behaviors with patients during ward rounds. Eligible teams included a hospitalist and at least one trainee (resident, intern, medical student), in addition to nonphysicians. Random-effects models were used to estimate intervention effects based on RPAD scores that sum points on nine SDM behaviors per patient encounter. Results: In total, 527 patient encounters were scored during 175 rounds led by 49 hospitalists. Patient and team characteristics were similar across pre- and postintervention periods. Improvement was observed on all nine SDM behaviors. Adjusted for the hierarchical study design and covariates, the mean RPAD score improvement was 1.68 points (95% CI, 1.33–2.03; P < .001; Cohen d = 0.82), with intervention effects ranging from 0.7 to 2.5 points per service. Improvements were associated with longer patient encounters and a higher percentage of trainees per team. Conclusions: The intervention increased behaviors supporting SDM during ward rounds on four independent services. The findings recommend use of clinician-focused interventions to promote SDM adoption in the inpatient setting.