Ahmad Firdaus Mohd Haris

Facebook, TikTok, Instagram, Twitter. There is rarely anyone without any of these social media accounts. According to 2020 Internet User Survey by Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC), 88.7% of Malaysians are internet users. Out of that number, 93.3% of users use social media extensively. Social media has enabled users to connect with family and friends. It has done wonders to small businesses to prosper. It has also empowered communities to grow and prosper. However, there is one dark side to it; CYBERBULLYNG. According to the Merriam Webster dictionary, bullying is defined as “abuse and mistreatment of someone vulnerable by someone stronger, more powerful”. Most of the time, bullying is done when a bully is in the presence of his or her victim. However, in the cyber world, bullying extends beyond the physical presence. The act of bullying can be done 24 hours a day, by anyone at any time. A victim can be harassed with harsh comments via any social media accounts and even through text messages which sometimes invade the victim’s own privacy. There is no clear guidelines and policy regarding cyberbullying. Any form of enforcement is lax due to the nature of the internet being free for all. Thus, it is imperative to empower oneself to understand how to use social media effectively to prevent from being cyberbullied and also NOT to be a cyberbully. There are also tools that can be used in each social media platform to report such cyberbullying issues and also to report to the relevant agencies such as the Royal Malaysian Police and Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission. International Journal of Human and Health Sciences Supplementary Issue: 2023 Page: S14

The COVID-19 pandemic potentially increases doctors’ work demands and limits their recovery opportunity; this consequently puts them at a high risk of adverse mental health impacts. This study aims to estimate the level of doctors’ fatigue, recovery, depression, anxiety, and stress, and exploring their association with work demands and recovery experiences. This was a cross-sectional study among all medical doctors working at all government health facilities in Selangor, Malaysia. Data were collected in May 2020 immediately following the COVID-19 contagion peak in Malaysia by using self-reported questionnaires through an online medium. The total participants were 1050 doctors. The majority of participants were non-resident non-specialist medical officers (55.7%) and work in the hospital setting (76.3%). The highest magnitude of work demands was mental demand (M = 7.54, SD = 1.998) while the lowest magnitude of recovery experiences was detachment (M = 9.22, SD = 5.043). Participants reported a higher acute fatigue level (M = 63.33, SD = 19.025) than chronic fatigue (M = 49.37, SD = 24.473) and intershift recovery (M = 49.97, SD = 19.480). The majority of them had no depression (69.0%), no anxiety (70.3%), and no stress (76.5%). Higher work demands and lower recovery experiences were generally associated with adverse mental health. For instance, emotional demands were positively associated with acute fatigue (adj. b = 2.73), chronic fatigue (adj. b = 3.64), depression (adj. b = 0.57), anxiety (adj. b = 0.47), and stress (adj. b = 0.64), while relaxation experiences were negatively associated with acute fatigue (adj. b = −0.53), chronic fatigue (adj. b = −0.53), depression (adj. b = −0.14), anxiety (adj. b = −0.11), and stress (adj. b = −0.15). However, higher detachment experience was associated with multiple mental health parameters in the opposite of the expected direction such as higher level of chronic fatigue (adj. b = 0.74), depression (adj. b = 0.15), anxiety (adj. b = 0.11), and stress (adj. b = 0.11), and lower level of intershift recovery (adj. b = −0.21). In conclusion, work demands generally worsen, while recovery experiences protect mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic with the caveat of the role of detachment experiences.