Panagiota Kakotrichi

Aims/hypothesis: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of s.c. administered tirzepatide vs s.c. administered semaglutide for adults of both sexes with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: We searched PubMed and Cochrane up to 11 November 2023 for RCTs with an intervention duration of at least 12 weeks assessing s.c. tirzepatide at maintenance doses of 5 mg, 10 mg or 15 mg once weekly, or s.c. semaglutide at maintenance doses of 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg or 2.0 mg once weekly, in adults with type 2 diabetes, regardless of background glucose-lowering treatment. Eligible trials compared any of the specified doses of tirzepatide and semaglutide against each other, placebo or other glucose-lowering drugs. Primary outcomes were changes in HbA_1c and body weight from baseline. Secondary outcomes were achievement of HbA_1c target of ≤48 mmol/mol (≤6.5%) or 1c (mean difference −21.61 mmol/mol [−1.96%]) followed by tirzepatide 10 mg (−20.19 mmol/mol [−1.84%]), semaglutide 2.0 mg (−17.74 mmol/mol [−1.59%]), tirzepatide 5 mg (−17.60 mmol/mol [−1.60%]), semaglutide 1.0 mg (−15.25 mmol/mol [−1.39%]) and semaglutide 0.5 mg (−12.00 mmol/mol [−1.09%]). In between-drug comparisons, all tirzepatide doses were comparable with semaglutide 2.0 mg and superior to semaglutide 1.0 mg and 0.5 mg. Compared with placebo, tirzepatide was more efficacious than semaglutide for reducing body weight, with reductions ranging from 9.57 kg (tirzepatide 15 mg) to 5.27 kg (tirzepatide 5 mg). Semaglutide had a less pronounced effect, with reductions ranging from 4.97 kg (semaglutide 2.0 mg) to 2.52 kg (semaglutide 0.5 mg). In between-drug comparisons, tirzepatide 15 mg, 10 mg and 5 mg demonstrated greater efficacy than semaglutide 2.0 mg, 1.0 mg and 0.5 mg, respectively. Both drugs increased incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events compared with placebo, while neither tirzepatide nor semaglutide increased the risk of serious adverse events or severe hypoglycaemia. Conclusions/interpretation: Our data show that s.c. tirzepatide had a more pronounced effect on HbA_1c and weight reduction compared with s.c. semaglutide in people with type 2 diabetes. Both drugs, particularly higher doses of tirzepatide, increased gastrointestinal adverse events. Registration: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022382594 Graphical

Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of sotagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and grey literature sources up to August 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared sotagliflozin with placebo or other antidiabetic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes. Our primary outcome was change in HbA1c from baseline. We additionally assessed three secondary efficacy and 15 safety outcomes. We synthesized data using weighted mean differences (WMDs) and odds ratios (ORs), along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: We included 11 RCTs comprising 16 411 subjects in the meta‐analysis. Compared with placebo, sotagliflozin reduced HbA1c (WMD −0.42%, 95% CI −0.56 to −0.29), body weight (WMD −1.33 kg, 95% CI −1.57 to −1.09), and systolic blood pressure (WMD −2.44 mmHg, 95% CI −2.81 to −2.07). No difference was evident against other active comparators. Sotagliflozin reduced myocardial infarction (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.97) and heart failure (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.79) compared with placebo, and had a neutral effect on all‐cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and stroke. Treatment with sotagliflozin was safe regarding the incidence of serious adverse events, hypoglycaemia, and diabetic ketoacidosis. Nevertheless, it was associated with an increased incidence of diarrhoea, genital infections, and volume depletion events. Conclusions: Sotagliflozin reduces blood glucose, body weight, and systolic blood pressure, and demonstrates a beneficial effect on heart failure and myocardial infarction. Its overall safety profile is comparable with other sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors.

Aim: To compare the effects of glucose‐lowering drugs on body weight and blood pressure in adults with type 2 diabetes. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and grey literature sources until 29 September 2020 for randomized controlled trials of at least 24 weeks' duration assessing the effects of glucose‐lowering drugs on body weight and blood pressure in adults with type 2 diabetes. We performed frequentist network meta‐analyses and calculated weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals combining trial arms of different approved doses of a given intervention into a single group. We evaluated the confidence in pooled estimates using the CINeMA (Confidence In Network Meta‐Analysis) framework. Results: In total, 424 trials (276 336 patients) assessing 21 antidiabetic medications from nine drug classes were included. Subcutaneous semaglutide was the most efficacious in reducing body weight followed by oral semaglutide, exenatide twice‐daily, liraglutide, and the sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 (SGLT‐2) inhibitors empagliflozin, canagliflozin, dapagliflozin and ertugliflozin. The same agents also conferred the greatest reductions in systolic blood pressure. Metformin had a modest effect in reducing body weight and systolic blood pressure. Diastolic blood pressure was reduced with the SGLT‐2 inhibitors pioglitazone, exenatide twice‐daily and semaglutide. In subgroup analyses of trials with over 52 weeks' duration, semaglutide and SGLT‐2 inhibitors reduced both body weight and systolic blood pressure. Conclusions: Semaglutide and SGLT‐2 inhibitors conferred reductions both in body weight and blood pressure that were sustainable for over 1 year of treatment. These agents may be preferable treatment options for patients with type 2 diabetes who are overweight/obese and/or hypertensive.

Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with a glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist (GLP‐1 RA) and a sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library and grey literature sources up to 2 December 2019 for randomized controlled trials in adults with type 2 diabetes assessing the combination of GLP‐1RA and SGLT2i, either as co‐initiation therapy or as add‐on to each other, against placebo or an active comparator. The primary outcome was change in HbA _1c . Secondary outcomes included change in body weight, blood pressure and estimated glomerular filtration rate, and incidence of severe hypoglycaemia, all‐cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke and hospitalization for heart failure. We pooled data using random effects meta‐analyses. Results: Seven trials (1913 patients) were eligible. Compared with GLP‐1RA, GLP‐1RA/SGLT2i combination therapy was associated with a greater reduction in HbA1c (weighted mean difference −0.61%, 95% CI −1.09% to −0.14%, four studies), body weight (−2.59 kg, −3.68 to −1.51 kg, three studies) and systolic blood pressure (−4.13 mmHg, −7.28 to −0.99 mmHg, four studies). Compared with SGLT2i, GLP‐1RA/SGLT2i combination therapy reduced HbA1c (−0.85%, −1.19% to −0.52%, six studies) and systolic blood pressure (−2.66 mmHg, −5.26 to −0.06 mmHg, six studies), but not body weight (−1.46 kg, −2.94 to 0.03 kg, five studies). After excluding data for one trial that had a considerably longer duration than the remaining studies, body weight was also reduced versus SGLT2i (−1.79 kg, −2.99 to −0.59 kg, five studies). Combination therapy did not increase the incidence of severe hypoglycaemia. Data for mortality and cardiovascular outcomes were scarce. Conclusions: GLP‐1RA/SGLT2i combination therapy seems to reduce HbA _1c , body weight and systolic blood pressure without increasing the risk of severe hypoglycaemia compared with either GLP‐1RA or SGLT2i. No conclusions can be made regarding long‐term effectiveness or the effect on cardiovascular outcomes.