Sara Carvalhal

Peritoneal sarcomatosis is a rare malignant disease with a poor prognosis, secondary to peritoneal dissemination of abdominopelvic soft tissue sarcomas. Its rarity, together with the characteristic histological heterogeneity and the historically poor response to systemic treatments, has prevented the establishment of widely accepted treatment criteria with curative intent. In this sense, radical cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with peritonectomy procedures and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), widely used in peritoneal carcinomatosis with excellent results, have not had the same evolutionary development in patients with peritoneal sarcomatosis. A multidisciplinary working group of experts in sarcomas and peritoneal oncological surgery established a series of recommendations based on current scientific evidence for the management of peritoneal sarcomatosis, taking into account the different histological subgroups of abdominopelvic sarcomas that can cause it depending on their origin: retroperitoneal sarcomas, uterine sarcomas, and visceral/peritoneal sarcomas of GIST (gastrointestinal stromal tumor) and non-GIST origin. This article shows the results of sarcoma experts’ voting on the recommendations presented during the I Ibero-American Consensus on the Management of Peritoneal Sarcomatosis, which took place during the recent celebration of the III Hispanic-Portuguese Meeting for Updates on the Treatment of Sarcomas.

Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB) is a rare group of diseases caused by genetic variants in skin structural proteins. EB is characterized by varying degrees of skin fragility, blisters and impaired wound healing and is classified based on the ultrastructural levels of skin cleavage – simplex, junctional, dystrophic and Kindler Syndrome. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the most severe complication and most common cause of death of patients with EB, particularly in those with recessive dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa (RDEB). To date, the first line of treatment of SCC in patients with RDEB is surgery, despite the high risk of recurrence. Radiotherapy and systemic therapy have been avoided due to its skin toxicity. Recently, electrochemotherapy (ECT) has been proposed as a potential treatment. We report eight sessions of ECT using bleomycin for treatment of SCC in five patients with EB. After eight weeks all patients showed an objective response. Four patients (seven ECT sessions) had a complete response. The treatment was well tolerated, with mild adverse effects, such as local pain, erythema and ulceration. Our results demonstrate that ECT is a potential treatment for SCC in patients with RDEB.