Ryoko Katagiri
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Ryoko Katagiri has a total of 239 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Norie Sawada
Division of Cohort Research National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control Tokyo Japan
39 shared publications - Manami Inoue
Division of Prevention, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control , Tokyo
38 shared publications - Shoichiro Tsugane
Division of Cohort Research National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control Tokyo Japan
38 shared publications - Keitaro Matsuo
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Aichi Cancer Center Nagoya Japan
30 shared publications - Aesun Shin
Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine
28 shared publications - Sarah Krull Abe
Division of Prevention, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Tokyo, Japan
28 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 13 October 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Nutrition
- Vol. 65 (8) , 282
Optimizing Japanese dietary patterns to improve nutritional quality, reduce environmental impact under affordability constraints in younger and older adults from the nationwide MINNADE study
Purpose: To optimise diets that are more nutritious, have lower diet-related greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) based on cradle-to-pre-retail impact, and remain affordable for Japanese adults of different age groups. Methods: Eight-day dietary records collected from younger (aged 18–49 years; 711 males and 734 females) and older (aged 50–74 years; 565 males and 605 females) Japanese adults were analysed. For each sex–age group, optimised diets were derived under three optimisation models using Data Envelopment Analysis: (i) MaxNRF: maximisation of diet quality score (Nutrient Rich Food Index [NRF] 9.3); (ii) MinGHGE: minimisation of GHGE; and (iii) OPT2G: combination of both objectives. All models included a monetary cost constraint (105% of observed). The proportions of participants having inadequate nutrient intakes, based on the Japanese Dietary Reference Intakes, were compared between observed diets and three optimised diets. Results: All optimised diets showed NRF9.3 scores 13.5–35.9% higher than those observed in all sex-age groups. GHGE decreased by 12.6–32.7% in the MinGHGE and OPT2G only. Differences between the optimised and observed diets in NRF9.3 score and GHGE were generally larger in younger than in older adults. All optimised diets showed lower or similar prevalences of inadequate nutrient intake compared with observed values. However, in younger males, optimised diets with MinGHGE had less favourable macronutrient distributions and higher inadequacies of vitamins A, C, and riboflavin than observed. Conclusion: Optimised diets showed better nutrient adequacy and lower GHGE across all sex-age groups, although specific nutrient shortfalls warrant attention when minimising GHGE in younger males.
- 13 October 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Nutrition
- Vol. 65 (8) , 282
Open AccessOptimizing Japanese dietary patterns to improve nutritional quality, reduce environmental impact under affordability constraints in younger and older adults from the nationwide MINNADE study
Purpose: To optimise diets that are more nutritious, have lower diet-related greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) based on cradle-to-pre-retail impact, and remain affordable for Japanese adults of different age groups. Methods: Eight-day dietary records collected from younger (aged 18–49 years; 711 males and 734 females) and older (aged 50–74 years; 565 males and 605 females) Japanese adults were analysed. For each sex–age group, optimised diets were derived under three optimisation models using Data Envelopment Analysis: (i) MaxNRF: maximisation of diet quality score (Nutrient Rich Food Index [NRF] 9.3); (ii) MinGHGE: minimisation of GHGE; and (iii) OPT2G: combination of both objectives. All models included a monetary cost constraint (105% of observed). The proportions of participants having inadequate nutrient intakes, based on the Japanese Dietary Reference Intakes, were compared between observed diets and three optimised diets. Results: All optimised diets showed NRF9.3 scores 13.5–35.9% higher than those observed in all sex-age groups. GHGE decreased by 12.6–32.7% in the MinGHGE and OPT2G only. Differences between the optimised and observed diets in NRF9.3 score and GHGE were generally larger in younger than in older adults. All optimised diets showed lower or similar prevalences of inadequate nutrient intake compared with observed values. However, in younger males, optimised diets with MinGHGE had less favourable macronutrient distributions and higher inadequacies of vitamins A, C, and riboflavin than observed. Conclusion: Optimised diets showed better nutrient adequacy and lower GHGE across all sex-age groups, although specific nutrient shortfalls warrant attention when minimising GHGE in younger males.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure 3 from Reproductive and Hormonal Factors and Thyroid Cancer Risk: Pooled Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies in the Asia Cohort Consortium
Supplementary Figure 3: Forest plots of the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) generated by combining cohort-specific HRs for the association between reproductive factors and the overall risk of thyroid cancer in the Asia Cohort Consortium. A - Forest plot for the pooled HRs and CIs for breastfeeding status and thyroid cancer risk, overall B - Forest plot for the pooled HRs and CIs for postmenopausal status and thyroid cancer risk, overall C - Forest plot for the pooled HRs and CIs for age at menopause and thyroid cancer risk, overall
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure 3 from Reproductive and Hormonal Factors and Thyroid Cancer Risk: Pooled Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies in the Asia Cohort Consortium
Supplementary Figure 3: Forest plots of the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) generated by combining cohort-specific HRs for the association between reproductive factors and the overall risk of thyroid cancer in the Asia Cohort Consortium. A - Forest plot for the pooled HRs and CIs for breastfeeding status and thyroid cancer risk, overall B - Forest plot for the pooled HRs and CIs for postmenopausal status and thyroid cancer risk, overall C - Forest plot for the pooled HRs and CIs for age at menopause and thyroid cancer risk, overall
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Methods 1 from Reproductive and Hormonal Factors and Thyroid Cancer Risk: Pooled Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies in the Asia Cohort Consortium
Supplementary Methods 1: Details on the development of the Asia Cohort Consortium reproductive factor working group protocol
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Methods 1 from Reproductive and Hormonal Factors and Thyroid Cancer Risk: Pooled Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies in the Asia Cohort Consortium
Supplementary Methods 1: Details on the development of the Asia Cohort Consortium reproductive factor working group protocol
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure 4 from Reproductive and Hormonal Factors and Thyroid Cancer Risk: Pooled Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies in the Asia Cohort Consortium
Supplementary Figure 4: Forest plots of the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) generated by combining cohort-specific HRs for the association between reproductive factors and the overall risk of thyroid cancer in the Asia Cohort Consortium. A - Forest plot for the pooled HRs and CIs for oral contraceptive use and thyroid cancer risk, overall B - Forest plot for the pooled HRs and CIs for hormone replace therapy use and thyroid cancer risk, overall
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure 4 from Reproductive and Hormonal Factors and Thyroid Cancer Risk: Pooled Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies in the Asia Cohort Consortium
Supplementary Figure 4: Forest plots of the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) generated by combining cohort-specific HRs for the association between reproductive factors and the overall risk of thyroid cancer in the Asia Cohort Consortium. A - Forest plot for the pooled HRs and CIs for oral contraceptive use and thyroid cancer risk, overall B - Forest plot for the pooled HRs and CIs for hormone replace therapy use and thyroid cancer risk, overall
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table 2 from Reproductive and Hormonal Factors and Thyroid Cancer Risk: Pooled Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies in the Asia Cohort Consortium
Supplementary Table 2: Distribution of total cases according to histology according to participating cohorts
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table 2 from Reproductive and Hormonal Factors and Thyroid Cancer Risk: Pooled Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies in the Asia Cohort Consortium
Supplementary Table 2: Distribution of total cases according to histology according to participating cohorts
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure 5 from Reproductive and Hormonal Factors and Thyroid Cancer Risk: Pooled Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies in the Asia Cohort Consortium
Supplementary Figure 5: Forest plot of stratified analysis between number of children/deliveries and thyroid cancer risk by birth years in the Asia Cohort Consortium. The Pooled Hazard Ratios (HRs) with 95% Confidence intervals (CIs) were generated by combining cohort-specific HRs. Models were adjusted for smoking status, alcohol drinking status and Body mass index. a Significant (p-value <0.05) trend across categories of the reproductive factor. b Significant (p-value <0.05) for interaction indicating a modifying effect on the association between the reproductive factor and thyroid cancer risk.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure 5 from Reproductive and Hormonal Factors and Thyroid Cancer Risk: Pooled Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies in the Asia Cohort Consortium
Supplementary Figure 5: Forest plot of stratified analysis between number of children/deliveries and thyroid cancer risk by birth years in the Asia Cohort Consortium. The Pooled Hazard Ratios (HRs) with 95% Confidence intervals (CIs) were generated by combining cohort-specific HRs. Models were adjusted for smoking status, alcohol drinking status and Body mass index. a Significant (p-value <0.05) trend across categories of the reproductive factor. b Significant (p-value <0.05) for interaction indicating a modifying effect on the association between the reproductive factor and thyroid cancer risk.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure 1 from Reproductive and Hormonal Factors and Thyroid Cancer Risk: Pooled Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies in the Asia Cohort Consortium
Supplementary Figure 1: Forest plots of the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) generated by combining cohort-specific HRs for the association between reproductive factors and the overall risk of thyroid cancer in the Asia Cohort Consortium. A - Forest plot for the pooled HRs and CIs for age at menarche and thyroid cancer risk, overall B - Forest plot for the pooled HRs and CIs for age at first delivery and thyroid cancer risk, overall
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure 1 from Reproductive and Hormonal Factors and Thyroid Cancer Risk: Pooled Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies in the Asia Cohort Consortium
Supplementary Figure 1: Forest plots of the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) generated by combining cohort-specific HRs for the association between reproductive factors and the overall risk of thyroid cancer in the Asia Cohort Consortium. A - Forest plot for the pooled HRs and CIs for age at menarche and thyroid cancer risk, overall B - Forest plot for the pooled HRs and CIs for age at first delivery and thyroid cancer risk, overall
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table 1 from Reproductive and Hormonal Factors and Thyroid Cancer Risk: Pooled Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies in the Asia Cohort Consortium
Supplementary Table 1: Study population and exclusion criteria by cohorts as established by the ACC reproductive factor working group
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table 1 from Reproductive and Hormonal Factors and Thyroid Cancer Risk: Pooled Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies in the Asia Cohort Consortium
Supplementary Table 1: Study population and exclusion criteria by cohorts as established by the ACC reproductive factor working group
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table 3 from Reproductive and Hormonal Factors and Thyroid Cancer Risk: Pooled Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies in the Asia Cohort Consortium
Supplementary Table 3: Pooled relative risks for recategorized age at menarche and age at menopause & incident thyroid cancer risk, Overall and papillary type
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table 3 from Reproductive and Hormonal Factors and Thyroid Cancer Risk: Pooled Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies in the Asia Cohort Consortium
Supplementary Table 3: Pooled relative risks for recategorized age at menarche and age at menopause & incident thyroid cancer risk, Overall and papillary type
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure 2 from Reproductive and Hormonal Factors and Thyroid Cancer Risk: Pooled Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies in the Asia Cohort Consortium
Supplementary Figure 2: Forest plots of the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) generated by combining cohort-specific HRs for the association between reproductive factors and the overall risk of thyroid cancer in the Asia Cohort Consortium. A - Forest plot for the pooled HRs and CIs for parity status and thyroid cancer risk, overall B - Forest plot for the pooled HRs and CIs for number of children/deliveries and thyroid cancer risk, overall C - Forest plot for the pooled HRs and CIs for recategorized number of children/deliveries and thyroid cancer risk, overall
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure 2 from Reproductive and Hormonal Factors and Thyroid Cancer Risk: Pooled Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies in the Asia Cohort Consortium
Supplementary Figure 2: Forest plots of the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) generated by combining cohort-specific HRs for the association between reproductive factors and the overall risk of thyroid cancer in the Asia Cohort Consortium. A - Forest plot for the pooled HRs and CIs for parity status and thyroid cancer risk, overall B - Forest plot for the pooled HRs and CIs for number of children/deliveries and thyroid cancer risk, overall C - Forest plot for the pooled HRs and CIs for recategorized number of children/deliveries and thyroid cancer risk, overall