AGAlexa C. Glencer

Alexa C. Glencer

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Alexa C. Glencer has a total of 49 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Magnetic resonance imaging insights from active surveillance of women with ductal carcinoma in situ

    by Heather I. Greenwood, Cristian K. Maldonado Rodas, Rita I. Freimanis, Alexa C. Glencer, Phoebe N. Miller, Rita A. Mukhtar, Case Brabham, Christina Yau, Jennifer M. Rosenbluth, Gillian L. Hirst, et al.

    New approaches are needed to determine which ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is at high risk for progression to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). We retrospectively studied DCIS patients who declined surgery (2002–2019), and received endocrine therapy (ET) and breast MRI. Baseline MRI and changes at 3 months and 6 months were analyzed by recursive partitioning to stratify IDC risk. Sixty-two patients (63 DCIS; 1 bilateral) with a mean follow-up of 8.5 years were included. Fifty-one percent remained on active surveillance (AS) without evidence of IDC, with a mean duration of 7.6 years. A decision tree based on MRI features of lesion distinctness and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) at baseline and change after 3 months of ET stratified patients into low, intermediate, and high risk for progression to IDC. MRI imaging features in patients treated with ET and undergoing AS, may help determine which DCIS lesions are at low versus high risk for IDC.


  • Open Access

    Tumor microenvironmental determinants of high-risk DCIS progression

    by Alexa Glencer, Kirithiga Ramalingam, Nicole Schindler, Hidetoshi Mori, Prachi Ghule, Kyra C Lee, Daniela Nachmanson, Adam Officer, Olivier Harismendy, Janet L Stein, et al.

    /SUMMARY: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) constitutes an array of morphologically recognized intraductal neoplasms in the mammary ductal tree defined by an increased risk for subsequent invasive carcinomas at or near the site of biopsy detection. However, only 15-45% of untreated DCIS cases progress to invasive cancer, so understanding mechanisms that prevent progression is key to avoid overtreatment and provides a basis for alternative therapies and prevention. This study was designed to characterize the tumor microenvironment and molecular profile of high-risk DCIS that grew to a large size but remained as DCIS. All patients had DCIS lesions >5cm in size with at least one additional high-risk feature: young age (PIK3CA and TP53 were common in this high-risk DCIS cohort (47% of evaluated lesions). Tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) density was higher in DCIS lesions with TP53 mutations (p=0.0079) compared to wildtype lesions, but not in lesions with PIK3CA mutations (p=0.44). Immune infiltrates were negatively associated with hormone receptor status and positively associated with HER2 expression. High levels of CD3+CD8-T cells were associated with good outcomes with respect to any subsequent recurrence (DCIS or invasive cancer), whereas high levels of CD3+Foxp3+ Treg cells were associated with poor outcomes. Spatial proximity analyses of immune cells and tumor cells demonstrated that close proximity of T cells with tumor cells was associated with good outcomes with respect to any recurrence as well as invasive recurrences. Interestingly, we found that myoepithelial continuity (distance between myoepithelial cells surrounding the involved ducts) was significantly lower in DCIS lesions compared to normal tissue (p=0.0002) or to atypical ductal hyperplasia (p=0.011). Gene set enrichment analysis identified several immune pathways associated with low myoepithelial continuity and a low myoepithelial continuity score was associated with better outcomes, suggesting that gaps in the myoepithelial layer may allow access/interactions between immune infiltrates and tumor cells. Our study demonstrates the immune microenvironment of DCIS, in particular the spatial proximity of tumor cells and T cells, and myoepithelial continuity are important determinants for progression of disease.


  • Open Access

    Table S2 from Identifying Good Candidates for Active Surveillance of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Insights from a Large Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy Cohort

    by Alexa C. Glencer, Phoebe N. Miller, Heather Greenwood, Cristian K. Maldonado Rodas, Rita Freimanis, Amrita Basu, Rita A. Mukhtar, Case Brabham, Paul Kim, E. Shelley Hwang, et al.

  • Open Access

    Table S1 from Identifying Good Candidates for Active Surveillance of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Insights from a Large Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy Cohort

    by Alexa C. Glencer, Phoebe N. Miller, Heather Greenwood, Cristian K. Maldonado Rodas, Rita Freimanis, Amrita Basu, Rita A. Mukhtar, Case Brabham, Paul Kim, E. Shelley Hwang, et al.

  • Open Access

    Data from Identifying Good Candidates for Active Surveillance of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Insights from a Large Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy Cohort

    by Alexa C. Glencer, Phoebe N. Miller, Heather Greenwood, Cristian K. Maldonado Rodas, Rita Freimanis, Amrita Basu, Rita A. Mukhtar, Case Brabham, Paul Kim, E. Shelley Hwang, et al.

    Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a biologically heterogenous entity with uncertain risk for invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) development. Standard treatment is surgical resection often followed by radiation. New approaches are needed to reduce overtreatment. This was an observational study that enrolled patients with DCIS who chose not to pursue surgical resection from 2002 to 2019 at a single academic medical center. All patients underwent breast MRI exams at 3- to 6-month intervals. Patients with hormone receptor–positive disease received endocrine therapy. Surgical resection was strongly recommended if clinical or radiographic evidence of disease progression developed. A recursive partitioning (R-PART) algorithm incorporating breast MRI features and endocrine responsiveness was used retrospectively to stratify risk of IDC. A total of 71 patients were enrolled, 2 with bilateral DCIS (73 lesions). A total of 34 (46.6%) were premenopausal, 68 (93.2%) were hormone-receptor positive, and 60 (82.1%) were intermediate- or high-grade lesions. Mean follow-up time was 8.5 years. Over half (52.1%) remained on active surveillance without evidence of IDC with mean duration of 7.4 years. Twenty patients developed IDC, of which 6 were HER2 positive. DCIS and subsequent IDC had highly concordant tumor biology. Risk of IDC was characterized by MRI features after 6 months of endocrine therapy exposure; low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were identified with respective IDC rates of 8.7%, 20.0%, and 68.2%. Thus, active surveillance consisting of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy and serial breast MRI may be an effective tool to risk-stratify patients with DCIS and optimally select medical or surgical management.Significance:A retrospective analysis of 71 patients with DCIS who did not undergo upfront surgery demonstrated that breast MRI features after short-term exposure to endocrine therapy identify those at high (68.2%), intermediate (20.0%), and low risk (8.7%) of IDC. With 7.4 years mean follow-up, 52.1% of patients remain on active surveillance. A period of active surveillance offers the opportunity to risk-stratify DCIS lesions and guide decisions for operative management.

  • Open Access

    Data from Identifying Good Candidates for Active Surveillance of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Insights from a Large Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy Cohort

    by Alexa C. Glencer, Phoebe N. Miller, Heather Greenwood, Cristian K. Maldonado Rodas, Rita Freimanis, Amrita Basu, Rita A. Mukhtar, Case Brabham, Paul Kim, E. Shelley Hwang, et al.

    Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a biologically heterogenous entity with uncertain risk for invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) development. Standard treatment is surgical resection often followed by radiation. New approaches are needed to reduce overtreatment. This was an observational study that enrolled patients with DCIS who chose not to pursue surgical resection from 2002 to 2019 at a single academic medical center. All patients underwent breast MRI exams at 3- to 6-month intervals. Patients with hormone receptor–positive disease received endocrine therapy. Surgical resection was strongly recommended if clinical or radiographic evidence of disease progression developed. A recursive partitioning (R-PART) algorithm incorporating breast MRI features and endocrine responsiveness was used retrospectively to stratify risk of IDC. A total of 71 patients were enrolled, 2 with bilateral DCIS (73 lesions). A total of 34 (46.6%) were premenopausal, 68 (93.2%) were hormone-receptor positive, and 60 (82.1%) were intermediate- or high-grade lesions. Mean follow-up time was 8.5 years. Over half (52.1%) remained on active surveillance without evidence of IDC with mean duration of 7.4 years. Twenty patients developed IDC, of which 6 were HER2 positive. DCIS and subsequent IDC had highly concordant tumor biology. Risk of IDC was characterized by MRI features after 6 months of endocrine therapy exposure; low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were identified with respective IDC rates of 8.7%, 20.0%, and 68.2%. Thus, active surveillance consisting of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy and serial breast MRI may be an effective tool to risk-stratify patients with DCIS and optimally select medical or surgical management.Significance:A retrospective analysis of 71 patients with DCIS who did not undergo upfront surgery demonstrated that breast MRI features after short-term exposure to endocrine therapy identify those at high (68.2%), intermediate (20.0%), and low risk (8.7%) of IDC. With 7.4 years mean follow-up, 52.1% of patients remain on active surveillance. A period of active surveillance offers the opportunity to risk-stratify DCIS lesions and guide decisions for operative management.

  • Open Access

    Table S1 from Identifying Good Candidates for Active Surveillance of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Insights from a Large Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy Cohort

    by Alexa C. Glencer, Phoebe N. Miller, Heather Greenwood, Cristian K. Maldonado Rodas, Rita Freimanis, Amrita Basu, Rita A. Mukhtar, Case Brabham, Paul Kim, E. Shelley Hwang, et al.

  • Open Access

    Table S2 from Identifying Good Candidates for Active Surveillance of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Insights from a Large Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy Cohort

    by Alexa C. Glencer, Phoebe N. Miller, Heather Greenwood, Cristian K. Maldonado Rodas, Rita Freimanis, Amrita Basu, Rita A. Mukhtar, Case Brabham, Paul Kim, E. Shelley Hwang, et al.

  • Open Access

    Identifying Good Candidates for Active Surveillance of Ductal CarcinomaIn Situ: Insights from a Large Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy Cohort

    by Alexa C. Glencer, Phoebe N. Miller, Heather Greenwood, Cristian K. Maldonado Rodas, Rita Freimanis, Amrita Basu, Rita A. Mukhtar, Case Brabham, Paul Kim, E. Shelley Hwang, et al.

    Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a biologically heterogenous entity with uncertain risk for invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) development. Standard treatment is surgical resection often followed by radiation. New approaches are needed to reduce overtreatment. This was an observational study that enrolled patients with DCIS who chose not to pursue surgical resection from 2002 to 2019 at a single academic medical center. All patients underwent breast MRI exams at 3- to 6-month intervals. Patients with hormone receptor–positive disease received endocrine therapy. Surgical resection was strongly recommended if clinical or radiographic evidence of disease progression developed. A recursive partitioning (R-PART) algorithm incorporating breast MRI features and endocrine responsiveness was used retrospectively to stratify risk of IDC. A total of 71 patients were enrolled, 2 with bilateral DCIS (73 lesions). A total of 34 (46.6%) were premenopausal, 68 (93.2%) were hormone-receptor positive, and 60 (82.1%) were intermediate- or high-grade lesions. Mean follow-up time was 8.5 years. Over half (52.1%) remained on active surveillance without evidence of IDC with mean duration of 7.4 years. Twenty patients developed IDC, of which 6 were HER2 positive. DCIS and subsequent IDC had highly concordant tumor biology. Risk of IDC was characterized by MRI features after 6 months of endocrine therapy exposure; low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were identified with respective IDC rates of 8.7%, 20.0%, and 68.2%. Thus, active surveillance consisting of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy and serial breast MRI may be an effective tool to risk-stratify patients with DCIS and optimally select medical or surgical management.Significance: A retrospective analysis of 71 patients with DCIS who did not undergo upfront surgery demonstrated that breast MRI features after short-term exposure to endocrine therapy identify those at high (68.2%), intermediate (20.0%), and low risk (8.7%) of IDC. With 7.4 years mean follow-up, 52.1% of patients remain on active surveillance. A period of active surveillance offers the opportunity to risk-stratify DCIS lesions and guide decisions for operative management.