Claudia Schweizer

Background/Objectives: Quality of life (QoL) is a valuable tool for evaluating treatment outcomes and identifying patients who may benefit from early supportive interventions. This study aimed to determine whether specific QoL results in patients with advanced rectal cancer could identify groups with an unfavourable prognosis in long-term follow-up. Methods: A total of 570 patients with advanced rectal cancer were prospectively assessed, during and up to five years after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy, using the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38 questionnaires. We analysed 27 functional and symptom-related scores to identify associations with overall survival, once at baseline, three times during therapy, and annually from years one to five post-therapy. Results: Poor quality of life scores were consistently associated with shorter overall survival. The functional scores of physical functioning, role functioning, and global health, as well as the symptom scores of fatigue, dyspnoea, and chemotherapy side effects, were highly significant for overall survival at nearly all time points except for the immediate preoperative assessment. Patients over the age of 64 with lower QoL scores showed a significantly reduced probability of survival in the follow-up period, and patients who reported poor QoL in at least two of the first three questionnaires during the initial phase of treatment showed significantly reduced overall survival. Conclusions: Early and repeated QoL assessments, particularly within the first weeks of therapy, offer critical prognostic value in advanced rectal cancer. Identifying patients with an unfavourable prognosis might allow faster interventions that could improve survival outcomes. Integrating QoL monitoring into routine clinical practice could enhance individualised care and support risk stratification.

Background/Objectives: Radiotherapy represents the only treatment option for patients with inoperable endometrial cancer (EC). The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brachytherapy (BT) in this selected patient population. Methods: Between 1990 and 2019, 18 patients with inoperable EC in stage FIGO I–IV were treated with intracavitary brachytherapy using the “Heyman Packing technique”. BT was performed either as sole PDR- or HDR-brachytherapy with a median cumulative dose up to 60.0 Gy (67.9 Gy _{EQD2 α/β = 3Gy}) and 34.0 Gy (75.6 Gy _{EQD2 α/β = 3Gy}), respectively. Results: The median follow-up was 46 months (6–219). The mean age was 71 years. The 5-year cumulative local recurrence rate (CLRR) for the whole cohort was 27.3%. The 5-year overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were 51%, 79%, and 69%. The 5-year DFS for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk EC was 89%, 50%, and 44% (p = 0.51). No significant difference in DFS was observed in patients over 70 (p = 0.526). No late side effects of grade > 1 were documented. Conclusions: Brachytherapy for inoperable EC is a safe and effective treatment option, offering good local control and OS with minimal toxicity. Moreover, brachytherapy effectively controls hemoglobin-relevant bleeding. Therefore, BT should be considered a viable alternative to non-curative treatment strategies in gynecological multidisciplinary conferences.

Background/Objectives: Advanced rectal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide and has a significant impact on public health. Because favorable and long-term survival has been achieved with multimodal therapy, patient quality of life is very important. The intention of this study was to assess patients’ quality of life using various functioning and symptom scores from the years 2010 to 2022 and to examine changes over time. Methods: Data on health-related quality of life were collected from rectal cancer patients treated at the University Hospital Erlangen in Germany over a period of 13 years. The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and the rectal cancer-specific module QLQ-CR38 were completed in this study by a total of 516 patients. The questionnaires were collected before, during and at annual follow-up visits after treatment. Statistical significance was defined as p-values < 0.05 as well as a difference of 10 or more percentage points. Results: The deterioration in scores is most pronounced immediately after radiochemotherapy, especially for pain (+19.8 pp), fatigue (+16.1 pp) and diarrhoea (+24.8 pp). One year after the end of therapy, most of the values are again comparable to or better than those of the German general population and only role functioning (−19.8 pp), social functioning (−24.6 pp), diarrhoea (−21.6 pp) and financial difficulties (−16.3 pp) are considerably worse. Some baselines deteriorate clearly over time from 2010 to 2022; these are role functioning (−23.9 pp), social functioning (−17.3 pp), body image (−15.2 pp), fatigue (+13.8 pp) and nausea and vomiting (+10.5 pp). Conclusions: An improvement in therapy in terms of a reduction in side effects and, thus, an improvement in quality of life over time could not be proven. The deterioration in individual scores over time does not appear to be a problem specific to rectal cancer patients, but rather, is associated with social developments or systemic healthcare factors in German society that are not directly related to oncological diseases.