Wilber Edison Bernaola-Paredes

Purpose To investigate the survival rate in implants placement in irradiated and non-irradiated bone in patients undergoing head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment. We focused on the consequences of the main complications, such as osteoradionecrosis and peri-implantitis. Methods An electronic search conducted by PRISMA protocol was performed. Full texts were carefully assessed, and data were assimilated into a tabular form for discussion and consensus among the expert panel. The quality assessment and the risk of bias are verified by Joanna Briggs Institute checklist (JBI) and The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS), and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) assessment tool. Results A total of 452 records were identified in the based on our PICOs strategy and after screening, 19 articles were included in the descriptive analysis of the review. Totaling 473 implants placed in irradiated and non-irradiated bone, and 31.6% of the patients were over 60 years of age. 57.9%) performed implant placement in a period of 12 months or more after the ending of radiotherapy. Only 5 studies had a follow-up period longer than 5 years after implant placement, of which three were used for the meta-analysis. In the meta-analysis of 5-year survival rate, analysis of implants in irradiated bone was assessed; a random effect model was used and a weighted proportion (PP) of 93.13% (95% CI: 87.20–99.06; p < 0.001), and in the 5-year survival rate, analysis of implants in non-irradiated bone was analysed; a fixed effect model was used and a weighted proportion (PP) of 98.52% survival (95% CI: 97.56–99.48, p < 0.001). Conclusions Survival rates of implants placed in irradiated bone are clinically satisfactory after a follow-up of 5 years, with a fewer percentage than in implants placed in non-irradiated bone after metanalyses performed.

Introduction and importance: Ablative surgery for oral cancer, irrespective of the histological subtype, causes large tissue defects, functional and aesthetic damage. Microsurgical free flaps have been widely used in reconstruction after resection, with satisfactory success rates in conjunction with adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). This study aims to describe our clinical institutional experience based on the multimodal treatment performed in four cases diagnosed with oral squamous cell carcinoma with the use of different microvascular free flaps and RT. Case series presentation: Four patients underwent reconstructive microsurgery after surgical resection of oral cancer, using three types of free flap: radial forearm fasciocutaneous, osteomyocutaneous fibular, and anterolateral thigh musculocutaneous flaps; RT was performed in Case 2 and Case 3. In the period of 3 years after microsurgical reconstruction and RT, flaps remain clinically stable without failure signs in full patients submitted to multimodal treatment. Clinical discussion: After resection of oral carcinomas, extensive tissue defects can be successfully treated with reconstructive microsurgery using different types of microvascular free flaps. RT for locoregional control is a feasible option and did not seem to interfere with the survival of flaps. Conclusion: An enhance long-term follow-up to assess overall and disease-free survival rates and quality of life must be carried out; however, cohort studies would be necessary for better understanding of the role of each treatment in the multimodal scheme.

BACKGROUND: Head and Neck Sarcomas (HNSs) are rare malignant tumors derived from mesenchymal cells characterized by rapid growth, local aggressive behavior, and multiple re-lapses. The Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) and the Osteosarcoma (OS) are the more frequent HNS. The present study aims to evaluate the clinical impact of multimodal treatment in patients diagnosed with HNS. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of medical records from patients diagnosed with HNS multimodal treated, four groups were formed: a) surgery and chemotherapy (CTX); b) surgery, CTX, and RT; c) surgery and RT; d) CTX and RT exclusively. The overall survival (OSS), disease-free survival (DFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier test. RESULTS: Among 39 patients, 23.1% were diagnosed with RMS , 66.7% with OS and 10.3% with other subtypes of HNS. Moreover, 59% showed initial clinical staging (T1/T2) and of those 35.9% were T1. Surgery was performed in 87.2% patients, RT in 35.9% and CTX in 84.7%. RT performed showed not statistically significant clinical role regarding OSS (p=0.74), DFS (p=0.09) and PFS (p=0.90) rates independent of histological subtype. Finally, OSS (p=0.89), DFS (p=0.13) and PFS (p=0.50) rates were not statistically different for patients treated with monotherapy or multimodal therapy. CONCLUSION: RT has not showed a clinically important role referred to improve OSS, DFS and PFS rates in patients with HNS, regardless of the histological subtype of the primary tumor. Multimodal treatment could influence in survival rates and locoregional control of the disease; however, longitudinal studies such as randomized clinical trials must be conducted.

Background and Objectives: Parotid cancer (PC), when treated surgically, may have associated damage to the functionality of the facial nerve. The role of radiotherapy in the recovery of facial motricity remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of radiotherapy (RT) on facial nerve functionality in patients who underwent parotidectomy and facial nerve microsurgical reconstruction. Materials and Methods: Four groups of patients were composed: (a) those who underwent parotidectomy without facial nerve reconstruction and RT; (b) those with nerve reconstruction and without RT; (c) those without nerve reconstruction and RT; and (d) those with nerve reconstruction and RT. Results: 49 patients were male, and 43 were female. A total of 89 underwent parotidectomy, 45 partials, and 44 total. Thus, in nine patients, the sural nerve was used for microsurgical reconstruction. Moreover, 48 patients had a normal facial pattern, 15 with paresthesia, and 29 with permanent paralyses after the House–Brackmann (HB) scale evaluation. Conclusions: The evaluation of nerve functionality after parotidectomy by the House–Brackmann scale is a feasible way to evaluate facial motricity that has already decreased in these patients. Finally, longitudinal studies must be performed to clarify the role of each therapy in the multimodal approach and their clinical impact in facial nerve function.

Summary: Radiation-induced head and neck sarcoma (RIHNS) is a rare and serious long-term complication of radiotherapy (RT), with poor prognosis and high morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis is based on immunohistochemistry and molecular biomarker analysis, and therapy is usually surgical. Other adjuvant therapies might be considered. This case report aimed to describe the clinical, imaging, histopathological, and therapeutic characteristics of a rare case of RIHNS in the mandible after 21 years of RT. A 68-year-old male patient underwent a partial left parotidectomy in 1995, was diagnosed with pleomorphic adenoma, and after recurrence of the lesion in 2000, underwent an ipsilateral total parotidectomy with adjuvant RT. In May 2021, he complained of an ulcerated nodular lesion on the tongue that extended toward the lower gingiva, associated with oral bleeding and difficulties with swallowing. After biopsy in the gingival margin and histopathological analysis, the diagnosis of high-grade spindle-cell sarcoma was established. Complete surgical resection with microsurgical reconstruction using a fibular osteomusculocutaneous free flap was performed. RIHNS could appear after a period of almost 20 years after RT. Surgical resection with reconstructive surgery was a reliable and feasible therapeutic option that showed favorable clinical results after an appropriate follow-up.

Congenital epulis (CE) is a rare condition in newborns, whose histogenesis remains unclear. It mostly presents as a circumscribed mass in the maxilla alveolar ridge of female neonates and can interfere with their normal breathing and breastfeeding. This benign oral lesion usually appears as a pedunculated nodule covered with normal mucosa that extends from the anterior vestibular alveolar ridge up to the posterior region. There are some pathological conditions that show clinical and histopathological features similar to those of CE, such as granular cell tumor, gingival cyst of the newborn, vascular malformations and others. This case report aimed to describe the clinical and pathological features of a newborn patient with a clinical and histopathological diagnosis of CE on the right side of the maxillary alveolar ridge, treated with excision by laser surgery, with a follow-up of 5 months without any sign of recurrence.

Migratory stomatitis (MS) is an uncommon inflammatory condition with unclarified etiology, which despite its benign nature, may raise concerns for patients and diagnostic difficulties for professionals. This case report aims to describe the clinical features of a patient who presented with MS in conjunction with benign migratory glossitis (BMG), and its diagnostic process and management. The patient, a 25-year-old man, sought diagnosis of an oral condition, with cyclic behavior, which had been causing him great discomfort for a year. The patient presented erythematous patches on his lower lips and right side of the buccal mucosa, surrounded by a slightly elevated halo with a concomitant classical picture of BMG. After analysis of his entire symptomatology, the diagnosis of MS associated with BMG was concluded. The patient received clear explanations and symptomatic treatment. The diagnosis of MS may be challenging, even to oral medicine practitioners, especially if it occurs alone. MS with concurrent manifestation of BMG may make the conditions easier to diagnose, but it does not exclude the need to apply a complete process of differential diagnosis to rule out other similar possibilities.

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), a malignant tumor derived from the neoplastic proliferation of striated skeletal muscle cells, is the most common pediatric soft tissue sarcoma. Its treatment is mainly based on neoadjuvant chemotherapy (QT+), surgical resection, and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT+). RT+ has shown satisfactory results for locoregional control of the disease, in spite of promoting local side effects. The present case report was aimed at describing the clinical and therapeutic characteristics and the management of complications resulting from multimodal therapy in a patient with an atypical presentation of RMS in the sinonasal tract. A 20-year-old Afro-descendant man complained of an expansive tumor lesion, with left eye proptosis that reduced visual acuity and caused severe regional pain. Imaging analysis showed an extensive and infiltrative lesion in the periorbital region, sinonasal tract, left maxilla, and orbital roof. According to the histopathological analysis, the diagnosis was established corresponding to parameningeal alveolar RMS that was unresectable. Treatment was initiated with three cycles of QT+ which showed partial response and later RT+. After completing half of the RT+ sessions, the patient showed a complete response with reduction in tumor volume and improvement in pain and local conditions. Side effects such as alopecia and dermatological changes induced by radiation were observed. Moreover, painful erythematous areas were observed in the region of the hard and soft palate, uvula, and oropharynx, compatible with Grade 2 mucositis lesions. After the cytological swab test, some of them were diagnosed as herpes simplex lesions; thickening and decrease in salivary flow were also found. A local drug therapy approach was instituted, and photobiomodulation was performed to manage oral complications. RT+ was shown to be effective in locoregional control of the disease; however, the early management of its undesirable effects on the surrounding tissues was required.

Fibrous Dysplasia (FD) is a benign fibro-osseous lesion, characterized by replacement with fibrous connective tissue instead of normal bone. The best treatment option for the condition has not yet been established, although several therapeutic approaches have been reported. The present case report describes the clinical, imaging and therapeutic aspects of an atypical bilateral presentation of FD in the mandible. A 26-year-old afro-descendent woman, who had previously undergone surgery to remove FD in the right hemimandible, complained of asymptomatic swelling in the left hemimandible. Imaging analysis showed an ipsilateral extensive multilocular mandibular lesion, with thinning of the cortical bone. After diagnosis of FD, complete surgical removal was performed, associated with immediate local reconstruction with xenograft and covering membrane, with primary wound closure. Bilateral presentation of FD is uncommon, and its diagnosis by means of clinical data, imaging and histopathological analysis, is relevant in order to establish the correct therapy. Complete surgical removal associated with immediate local bone reconstruction, has shown satisfactory clinical results, when adequate follow-up is performed.

Study Design: Ameloblastoma is a benign odontogenic tumor of epithelial origin, with locally aggressive behavior; and due to its invasiveness has increased recurrence rates. It is more frequent in the mandible than the maxilla. Surgical treatment is performed with approaches ranging from conservative to radical surgery, either followed by microvascular reconstruction, or not. Adjuvant treatment has shown better local control in refractory cases. Multiple relapses are associated with BRAF gene mutation at codon 600. Objective: This case series aimed to describe the clinical, imaging, histopathological, therapeutic and mutational characterization of 3 patients with refractory ameloblastoma in the maxilla. Methods: Data of 3 patients were collected, and descriptions were provided of procedures such as clinical, imaging, surgical technique, histopathological subtype and molecular analysis for detection of BRAFV600E mutation. Results It was obtained a locoregional control after RT of two cases described. After BRAF mutation molecular analysis, no patient presented it. Conclusion: Surgery remains the gold standard for the treatment of ameloblastomas, even in refractory cases; however, an expanded approach to obtain free surgical margins, and reconstruction of the maxilla itself may be challenging. Adjuvant radiotherapy is still a controversial topic, but could favor reduction of the local recurrence rate in cases where the surgical margins are compromised after surgical resection. Further studies will be necessaries for analysis of the BRAFV600E mutation, for therapeutic purposes.