Mirjana Bonković

Mirjana Bonković

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Mirjana Bonković has a total of 16 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Cost-Aware Active Learning Framework for Efficient Small-Object Detection in Agricultural Images

    by Mirjana Bonković, Ozana Uvodić, Josip Musić, Vladan Papić

    Although active learning can reduce the effort required to annotate object detection data, many current methods rely on a single selection criterion or combine criteria without accounting for annotation costs or their interactions. This paper presents a multi-criterion, cost-aware active learning framework for detecting small objects in agricultural images. The framework jointly considers prediction uncertainty, object size, scene density, and annotation cost. We evaluate both scalarized and Pareto-based selection strategies across five cost models and conduct an ablation study to examine the role and interactions of each criterion. Experimental results demonstrate that explicit annotation cost modeling improves active learning efficiency by reducing the amount of annotation required to achieve a given level of detection performance. Across multiple cost formulations and selection strategies, cost-aware acquisition reaches comparable accuracy and reduces the estimated annotation effort required to reach comparable detection performance by up to 50% compared to random sampling, where annotation effort is approximated using prediction-derived cost proxies.


  • Open Access

    Comparison and Evaluation of Machine Learning-Based Classification of Hand Gestures Captured by Inertial Sensors

    by Ivo Stančić, Josip Musić, Tamara Grujić, Mirela Kundid Vasić, Mirjana Bonković

    Gesture recognition is a topic in computer science and language technology that aims to interpret human gestures with computer programs and many different algorithms. It can be seen as the way computers can understand human body language. Today, the main interaction tools between computers and humans are still the keyboard and mouse. Gesture recognition can be used as a tool for communication with the machine and interaction without any mechanical device such as a keyboard or mouse. In this paper, we present the results of a comparison of eight different machine learning (ML) classifiers in the task of human hand gesture recognition and classification to explore how to efficiently implement one or more tested ML algorithms on an 8-bit AVR microcontroller for on-line human gesture recognition with the intention to gesturally control the mobile robot. The 8-bit AVR microcontrollers are still widely used in the industry, but due to their lack of computational power and limited memory, it is a challenging task to efficiently implement ML algorithms on them for on-line classification. Gestures were recorded by using inertial sensors, gyroscopes, and accelerometers placed at the wrist and index finger. One thousand and eight hundred (1800) hand gestures were recorded and labelled. Six important features were defined for the identification of nine different hand gestures using eight different machine learning classifiers: Decision Tree (DT), Random Forests (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Support Vector Machine (SVM) with linear kernel, Naïve Bayes classifier (NB), K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN), and Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD). All tested algorithms were ranged according to Precision, Recall, and F1-score (abb.: P-R-F1). The best algorithms were SVM (P-R-F1: 0.9865, 0.9861, and 0.0863), and RF (P-R-F1: 0.9863, 0.9861, and 0.0862), but their main disadvantage is their unusability for on-line implementations in 8-bit AVR microcontrollers, as proven in the paper. The next best algorithms have had only slightly poorer performance than SVM and RF: KNN (P-R-F1: 0.9835, 0.9833, and 0.9834) and LR (P-R-F1: 0.9810, 0.9810, and 0.9810). Regarding the implementation on 8-bit microcontrollers, KNN has proven to be inadequate, like SVM and RF. However, the analysis for LR has proved that this classifier could be efficiently implemented on targeted microcontrollers. Having in mind its high F1-score (comparable to SVM, RF, and KNN), this leads to the conclusion that the LR is the most suitable classifier among tested for on-line applications in resource-constrained environments, such as embedded devices based on 8-bit AVR microcontrollers, due to its lower computational complexity in comparison with other tested algorithms.


  • Robotics and information technologies in education: four countries from Alpe-Adria-Danube Region survey

    by Josip Musić, Mirjana Bonković, Stanko Kružić, Tea Marasović, Vladan Papić, Snezhana Kostova, Maya Dimitrova, Svetoslava Saeva, Milen Zamfirov, Vassilis Kaburlasos, et al.