Kathryn E. Frazier
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Kathryn E. Frazier has a total of 19 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Alix P. Barry
Worcester State University
1 shared publication- Chonika Coleman-King
College of Education, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
1 shared publication - Colleen C. Myles
Texas State University
1 shared publication - Helen K. Ho
Independent scholar
1 shared publication - Ivanna Richardson
University of Ottawa
1 shared publication - Jacquelyn N. Raftery-Helmer
Worcester State University
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 26 June 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Family Studies
- Vol. 32 (2) , 292-314
Reconciling intensive mothering: exploring how American mothers reframe, redefine or reject mothering ideals of their own childhood
- 26 June 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Family Studies
- Vol. 32 (2) , 292-314
Reconciling intensive mothering: exploring how American mothers reframe, redefine or reject mothering ideals of their own childhood
- 9 June 2023
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 277-300
Building a Virtual Village: Academic Mothers’* Online Social Networking During COVID-19
- 9 June 2023
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 277-300
Building a Virtual Village: Academic Mothers’* Online Social Networking During COVID-19
- 20 October 2020
- Published by SAGE Publications in Feminism & Psychology
- Vol. 31 (3) , 404-423
“Up for it” or “asking for it”? Violence against women in the age of postfeminism
Postfeminist young women are encouraged to “embrace” their sexuality by sexualizing their bodies as a means of empowerment. In stark contrast, dominant understandings of violence identify these same bodily displays as risk factors, condemning women who enact them as “asking for” victimization. While these competing demands on the female body have been widely documented in popular media, empirical work has not investigated if, and the extent to which, women reproduce these tension-filled constructions of the body in their own lives. Using in-depth interviews with 15 participants of varied race, class and gender identity in the US, this paper explores the ways in which these conflicting discursive constructions of the body are enacted by participants in their everyday lives. While participants took up varied sensibilities of the body and empowerment (including several that emphasized sexiness and sexuality), participants uniformly discussed perceptions of risk that inscribed the female body as vulnerable. This produced tensions in reasoning for some participants (but not all), in ways that were intersectionally inflected by race and gender presentation. More broadly, data suggests that postfeminist (and other) visions of the body that appear to otherwise produce lived experiences of empowerment are deemed invalid in contexts of risk.
- 20 October 2020
- Published by SAGE Publications in Feminism & Psychology
- Vol. 31 (3) , 404-423
“Up for it” or “asking for it”? Violence against women in the age of postfeminism
Postfeminist young women are encouraged to “embrace” their sexuality by sexualizing their bodies as a means of empowerment. In stark contrast, dominant understandings of violence identify these same bodily displays as risk factors, condemning women who enact them as “asking for” victimization. While these competing demands on the female body have been widely documented in popular media, empirical work has not investigated if, and the extent to which, women reproduce these tension-filled constructions of the body in their own lives. Using in-depth interviews with 15 participants of varied race, class and gender identity in the US, this paper explores the ways in which these conflicting discursive constructions of the body are enacted by participants in their everyday lives. While participants took up varied sensibilities of the body and empowerment (including several that emphasized sexiness and sexuality), participants uniformly discussed perceptions of risk that inscribed the female body as vulnerable. This produced tensions in reasoning for some participants (but not all), in ways that were intersectionally inflected by race and gender presentation. More broadly, data suggests that postfeminist (and other) visions of the body that appear to otherwise produce lived experiences of empowerment are deemed invalid in contexts of risk.