Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Lanlan Cai has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Hong Chen

    State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Fujian Key Laboratory of Marine Carbon Sequestration, College of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China

    1 shared publication
  • Jingjing Niu

    State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Fujian Key Laboratory of Marine Carbon Sequestration, College of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China

    1 shared publication
  • Long Wang

    State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Fujian Key Laboratory of Marine Carbon Sequestration, College of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China

    1 shared publication
  • Maoqiu He

    Fisheries College, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan 316022, China

    1 shared publication
  • Rui Zhang

    Archaeal Biology Center, Synthetic Biology Research Center, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Marine Microbiome Engineering, Key Laboratory of Marine Microbiome Engineering of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Institute for Advanced Study, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Grinding Beads Influence Microbial DNA Extraction from Organic-Rich Sub-Seafloor Sediment

    by Jingjing Niu, Hong Chen, Lanlan Cai, Maoqiu He, Rui Zhang, Long Wang

    Sub-seafloor sediment is the largest microbial habitat on Earth. The study of microbes in sub-seafloor sediment is largely limited by the technical challenge of acquiring ambient microbial DNA because of sediment heterogeneity. Changes in the extraction method, even just by one step, can affect the extraction yields for complicated sediment samples. In this work, sub-seafloor sediment samples from the Baltic Sea with high organic carbon content were used to evaluate the influence of different grinding beads on DNA extraction. We found that the grinding beads can affect the DNA extraction from the organic-matter- and biosiliceous-clay-rich samples. A mixture of 0.5-mm and 0.1-mm grinding beads exhibited higher DNA yields and recovered more unique taxa than other bead combinations, such as Stenotrophomonas from Gammaproteobacteria and Leptotrichia from Fusobacteria; therefore, these beads are more suitable than the others for DNA extraction from the samples used in this study. This advantage might be magnified in samples with high biomass. On the contrary, the use of only small beads might lead to underestimation for certain Gram-positive strains. Overall, the discovery of abundant widespread deep biosphere clades in our samples indicated that our optimized DNA extraction method successfully recovered the in situ microbial community.