Sharon J. Phillips
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Sharon J. Phillips has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Ariana H Bennett
Department of Family and Social Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY and
1 shared publicationKathryn M. Curtis
Division of Reproductive Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
1 shared publicationKavita Nanda
FHI 360, Durham, NC, USA
1 shared publicationMarji Gold
Department of Family and Social Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY and
1 shared publicationMarleen Temmerman
Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
1 shared publicationMichele R Hacker
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 1 September 2016
- Published by Elsevier in Contraception
- Vol. 94 (3) , 226-252
Progestogen-only contraceptive use among breastfeeding women: a systematic review
- 1 September 2016
- Published by Elsevier in Contraception
- Vol. 94 (3) , 226-252
Open AccessProgestogen-only contraceptive use among breastfeeding women: a systematic review
- Open Access
- 1 April 2016
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Family Practice
- Vol. 33 (3) , 286-289
Reproductive coercion: an under-recognized challenge for primary care patients
Reproductive coercion impacts many women of reproductive age. We sought to explore how reproductive coercion, including pregnancy coercion and birth control sabotage, impacts women in a primary care population. We administered a survey to women accessing care at a family medicine clinic in the Bronx, NY. Reproductive coercion was defined as a positive response to at least one of five questions adapted from previous studies. We assessed the association of reproductive and demographic characteristics with a lifetime history of reproductive coercion. At least one form of reproductive coercion was reported by 24% of the 97 respondents. Current lack of personal safety and a history of transactional sex for money or a place to stay were significantly associated with having experienced reproductive coercion (all P ≤ 0.02). Reproductive coercion was common among women of reproductive age at this urban family medicine clinic in an underserved community, and was associated with other forms of control and violence. Clinicians are advised to discuss birth control sabotage and pregnancy coercion with their patients.
- 1 April 2016
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Family Practice
- Vol. 33 (3) , 286-289
Open AccessReproductive coercion: an under-recognized challenge for primary care patients
Reproductive coercion impacts many women of reproductive age. We sought to explore how reproductive coercion, including pregnancy coercion and birth control sabotage, impacts women in a primary care population. We administered a survey to women accessing care at a family medicine clinic in the Bronx, NY. Reproductive coercion was defined as a positive response to at least one of five questions adapted from previous studies. We assessed the association of reproductive and demographic characteristics with a lifetime history of reproductive coercion. At least one form of reproductive coercion was reported by 24% of the 97 respondents. Current lack of personal safety and a history of transactional sex for money or a place to stay were significantly associated with having experienced reproductive coercion (all P ≤ 0.02). Reproductive coercion was common among women of reproductive age at this urban family medicine clinic in an underserved community, and was associated with other forms of control and violence. Clinicians are advised to discuss birth control sabotage and pregnancy coercion with their patients.