David Foster Gaieski

Introduction: Scurvy, the disease state caused by ascorbic acid deficiency, was once an extremely common disease but is now thought to be a rare disease in postmodern societies. Physicians are not trained to consider scurvy as a possible diagnosis in patients at risk; rather, it is considered a rare diagnosis to add to a differential for completeness’s sake. Methods: We sought to describe the scorbutic patients seen by one physician during a busy academic emergency medicine career. Case series of patients seen by one physician between 1993 and 2023 at five academic teaching hospitals with Emergency Departments (EDs) in the mid-Eastern United States. Presenting signs and symptoms, known scurvy risk factors, Vitamin C levels, clinical course, and outcome for each patient are described. Results: There were 14 presentations by 12 patients diagnosed with scurvy who were initially evaluated in the ED between 1993 and 2023. Each patient had a known risk factor for inadequate Vitamin C intake. All had clinical findings suggestive of scurvy and all but one had a subnormal serum Vitamin C level detected on serum samples sent from the ED. Conclusion: The detection of 12 cases of scurvy by one physician over a three-decade period highlights the importance of screening for scurvy in at-risk populations and generates the hypothesis that scurvy is not a rare disease but rather a rare diagnosis. This research hypothesis should be investigated in further studies.

Background: International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiovascular care science and treatment recommendations (CoSTR) have reported updates on CPR maneuvers every 5 years since 2000. However, few national population‐based studies have investigated the comprehensive effectiveness of those updates for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest due to shockable rhythms. The primary objective of the present study was to determine whether CPR based on CoSTR 2005 or 2010 was associated with improved outcomes in Japan, as compared with CPR based on Guidelines 2000. Methods and Results: From the All‐Japan Utstein Registry between 2005 and 2015, we included 73 578 adults who had shockable out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest witnessed by bystanders or emergency medical service responders. The study outcomes over an 11‐year period were compared between 2005 of the Guidelines 2000 era, from 2006 to 2010 of the CoSTR 2005 era, and from 2011 to 2015 of the CoSTR 2010 era. In the bystander‐witnessed group, the adjusted odds ratios for favorable neurological outcomes at 30 days after out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest by enrollment year increased year by year (1.19 in 2006, and 3.01 in 2015). Similar results were seen in the emergency medical service responder‐witnessed group and several subgroups. Conclusions: Compared with CPR maneuvers for shockable out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest recommended in the Guidelines 2000, CPR maneuver updates in CoSTR 2005 and 2010 were associated with improved neurologically intact survival year by year in Japan. Increased public awareness and greater dissemination of basic life support may be responsible for the observed improvement in outcomes. Registration: URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ ; Unique identifier: 000009918.

Introduction: Early detection and optimal resuscitation of critically ill sepsis patients may improve sepsis care delivery. The objective was to assess the feasibility of developing and implementing an end-to-end sepsis solution including early detection, monitoring, and teleconsultation. Methods: Prospective implementation of an end-to-end sepsis solution for potential sepsis patients presenting to a community hospital emergency department (ED) between 11 AM and 5 PM, Monday to Friday, during a 40-day period in 2019. Qualifying patients were compared with patients presenting at other times during the pilot screening period and to historic controls. Results: During the initial period, 203 patients met the screening criteria for potential sepsis; 77 patients (37.9%) had a primary diagnosis of sepsis, present on admission. Mean age was 60 ± 20 years; 50.7% were female; and 24 patients (11.8%) were primary sepsis, SEP-1 bundle eligible. Eighty of 203 (39.4%) had an initial lactate performed, mean, 2.7 ± 1.7 mmol/L. For the 24 primary sepsis, SEP-1 bundle eligible patients, 100% received antibiotics and intravenous fluid. Thirteen consults were performed on 12 patients; mean time from consult decision to beam in to the telemedicine robot was 7.3 ± 5.5 min; mean time from beam in to robot connection with the expert was 23.6 ± 13.2 s; mean consultation call time was 6.3 ± 4.3 min. Conclusions: In a convenience sample of patients with potential sepsis presenting to a community hospital ED, an end-to-end sepsis solution using early detection, tracking, and consultation was feasible and has the potential to improve sepsis detection and treatment.

OBJECTIVES: We analyzed whether patients with the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition (ICD-10) discharge diagnosis code for sepsis are different in regard to demographics and outcome variables when comparing those with sepsis only to those also diagnosed with COVID-19 or those with a COVID-19 diagnosis alone. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Nine hospitals in an academic health system. PATIENTS: Patients with a final ICD-10 discharge diagnostic code for sepsis only, a diagnosis of COVID-19-only, or a final sepsis ICD-10 discharge code + a diagnosis of COVID-19 admitted to the hospital were analyzed for demographic and outcome differences between the cohorts. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 11,395 patients met inclusion criteria: 6,945 patients (60.9%) were ICD-10 sepsis code only, 3,294 patients (28.9%) were COVID-19 diagnosis-only, and 1,153 patients (10.1%) were sepsis ICD-10 code + COVID-19 diagnosis. Comparing sepsis ICD-10 code + COVID-19 diagnosis patients to sepsis ICD-10 code only and COVID-19 diagnosis-only patients, the sepsis ICD-10 code + COVID-19 diagnosis patients were: older (69 [58–78] vs 67 [56–77] vs 64 [51–76] yr), less likely to be female (40.3% vs 46.7% vs 49.5%), more frequently admitted to the ICU (59.3% [684/1,153] vs 54.9% [1,810/3,297] vs 15% [1,042/6,945]), more frequently required ventilatory support (39.3% [453/1,153] vs 31.8% [1,049/3,297] vs 6.0% [417/6,945]), had longer median hospital length of stay (9 [5,16] vs 5 [3,8] vs 7. [4,13] d), and were more likely to die in the hospital (39.2% [452/1,153] vs 22.3% [735/3,297] vs 6.4% [444/6,945]). CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic the sickest cohort of patients was those receiving an explicit ICD-10 code of sepsis + a COVID-19 diagnosis. A significant percentage of COVID-19 diagnosis-only patients appear to have been under-coded as they received a level of critical care (ICU admission; intubation) suggestive of the presence of acute organ dysfunction during their admission.

Aim: We sought to collect granular data on temperature burden to further explore existing conflicting information on the relationship between temperature alterations and outcomes in patients with sepsis requiring hospital admission.Methods: This was a prospective cohort study that enrolled a convenience sample of patients with sepsis or septic shock admitted to the hospital from the emergency department (ED). A “unit of temperature burden (UTB)” was defined as >1°C (1.8°F) above or below 37°C (98.6°F) for 1 min. Fever burden was defined as the number of UTBs >38°C (100.4°F). The primary objective was to calculate the fever burden in patients with sepsis during their ED stay. This was analyzed for patients who present to triage febrile or hypothermic and also for those who developed temperature abnormalities during their ED stay. The secondary objectives were correlating fever and hypothermia burden with in‐hospital mortality, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria, and the quick Sequential (Sepsis‐Associated) Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score and identification of patients who may benefit from early implementation of targeted temperature management.Results: A total of 256 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of patients was 60.1 ± 18.4 years; 46% were female and 29.6% were black. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) fever burden for the fever in triage cohort (n = 99) was 364.6 (174.3‐716.8) UTB and for the no fever in triage cohort (n = 157) was 179.3 (80.9‐374.0) UTB (p = 0.005). The two groups had similar in‐hospital mortality (6.1 vs 8.3%; p = 0.5). The median fever burden for the fever anytime cohort was 303.8 (IQR 138.8‐607.9) UTB and they had lower mortality than the no fever anytime cohort (4.7% vs 11.2%; p = 0.052). Patients with fever at triage had higher mean SIRS criteria than those without (2.8 vs 2.0; p < 0.001) while qSOFA points were similar (p = 0.199). A total of 27 patients had hypothermia during their ED stay and these patients were older with higher mean SIRS criteria.Conclusions: Patients with sepsis and septic shock have a significant temperature burden in the ED. When comparing patients who had fever at any time during their ED stay with those who never had a fever, a trend toward an inverse relationship between fever burden and mortality was found.

Aim: In Japan, no training course is dedicated to postcardiac arrest care (PCAC), including venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA‐ECMO); thus, faculty members of the Japanese Circulation Society developed an original, comprehensive PCAC training course. This report reviews the development, implementation, and refinement of this PCAC training course.Methods: We examined the preserved data from the Japanese Circulation Society PCAC training courses between 2014 and 2020. Data related to the learning content and number of the attendees and instructors were collected and summarized.Results: Sixteen courses were held between August 2014 and February 2020, before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. A total of 677 health care providers participated: 351 doctors, 225 nurses, 62 perfusionists, five emergency medical professionals, and two pharmacists. Thirty‐two attendees’ data were missing. The core learning contents of all the courses included a standardized postcardiac arrest algorithm, targeted temperature management, VA‐ECMO cannulation skills, and postcannulation management. Concerning curriculum evolution, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation simulation, postarrest neurological examination and monitoring, and ultrasound‐guided Seldinger technique training were added in the 4th, 5th, and 13th courses, respectively.Conclusion: The Japanese Circulation Society PCAC training course has been developed and refined to provide an organized, comprehensive opportunity for health care providers to acquire specific knowledge and skills in PCAC and VA‐ECMO.

OBJECTIVES: We undertook a process improvement initiative to expedite rapid identification of potential sepsis patients based on triage chief complaint, vital signs, and initial lactate level. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Seven hundred-bed tertiary care hospital with ≅65,000 patient visits/yr. PATIENTS: Patients presenting to emergency department (ED) triage who met the following criteria: greater than or equal to two of the three systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria assessable in triage, a chief complaint suggestive of infection, emergency severity index 2 or 3, and ambulatory to ED. INTERVENTIONS: A computer-generated lactate order was created, staff education and resources increased, and point-of-care lactate testing was introduced. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary endpoints include the following: percent of patients having a lactate level drawn, percent of lactate samples resulting before room placement, and time intervals from triage to lactate blood draw and to lactate result. Secondary endpoints were percentage of patients admitted to the hospital, percentage admitted to the ICU, and in-hospital mortality. Six thousand nine hundred six patients were included: 226 historic controls (HCs) and 6,680 intervention group patients. The mean serum lactate level was 1.77 ± 1.18 mmol/L. The percentage of patients having a lactate resulted increased from 27.4% in the HC period to 79.6%. The percentage of these lactate results available while the patient was still in the waiting room increased from 0.4% during the HC period to 33.7% during Phase 5 (p < 0.0001). In the intervention period, time from triage to lactate result decreased (78.1–63.4 min; p < 0.0001) and time to treatment room decreased (59.3–39.6 min; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a computerized lactate order using readily available data obtained during ED triage, combined with point-of-care lactate testing, improves time to lactate blood draw and lactate result in patients at risk for severe sepsis. Initial lactate levels correlated with admission to the hospital, admission to the ICU, and in-hospital mortality.

Preliminary data have produced conflicting results regarding whether initial vitamin C levels in patients with severe sepsis correlate with mortality outcomes. We hypothesized that low plasma ascorbic acid or thiamine levels in severe sepsis patients admitted from the Emergency Department (ED) to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) would be associated with increased mortality and an increased incidence of shock. Retrospective analysis of a prospective database of severe sepsis patients admitted to the ICU at an urban, academic medical center. Ascorbic acid and thiamine levels were analyzed in relation to survivors vs. non-survivors and shock vs. non-shock patients. 235 patients were included; mean age, 59.4 years ± 16.8 years; male, 128 (54.5%); in-hospital mortality, 16.6% (39/235); mean APACHE3 score, 61.8 ± 22.8; mean ascorbic acid level (reference range 0.40–2.10 mg/dL), 0.23 mg/dL (95% CI 0.07–4.02); and the mean thiamine level (reference range 14.6–29.5 nmol/L), 6.0 nmol/L (95% CI 4.0–9.5). When survivors were compared to non-survivors, survivors were more likely to be male (57.7% [113/196] vs. 38.5% [15/39]) and have lower APACHE3 scores (58.2 ± 22.6 vs. 79.9 ± 16.0). For the total cohort of 235 patients, there was no statistically significant relationship between a patient’s initial ascorbic acid or thiamine level and either survival or development of shock. In this analysis of early plasma samples from patients with severe sepsis admitted from the ED to the ICU, we found that mean ascorbic acid and thiamine levels were lower than normal range but that there was no relationship between these levels and outcomes, including 28 day mortality and development of shock.