Hongyuan Lin

Background: Optimal management of involved common carotid artery (CCA) with false-lumen thrombus remains unclear in aortic dissection patients. We aim to investigate outcomes and compare different surgical strategies. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study and the institutional database of acute type A aortic dissection was reviewed. The patients with CCA involvement and extended false-lumen thrombus were enrolled and grouped according to the management of CCA: extra-thoracic carotid artery replacement (CAR) and reconstruction in situ (RIS). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the effect of management on neurological outcomes. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis and log-rank test was used to compare the difference on survival rate. Results: From March 2011 to December 2019, 68 patients were enrolled (24 in the CAR group and 44 in the RIS group). The overall operative mortality was 7.4% (5 patients) and 21 patients had the incidence of postoperative neurological deficit was (30.9%). The rates of main postoperative complications were similar between the two groups. Twenty-five (56.8%) patients in the RIS group had residual false-lumen thrombus at discharge. In multivariate analysis, CAR was the only independent protective factor of postoperative neurological deficit [odds ratio (OR) =0.03, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.0–0.61, P=0.02] and age was the only risk factor (OR =1.34, 95% CI: 1.11–1.62, P=0.002). The median follow-up time was 40 (interquartile range, 24–69) months and some of the patients received imaging follow-up. The overall survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 95.8%, and 95.8% in the CAR group and 84.1%, and 76.4% in the RIS group, with no significant difference (P=0.22). No cerebrovascular accident and reintervention occurred and 20 (90.9%) patients with residual false-lumen thrombus had reabsorption of thrombus during the follow-up period. Conclusions: CAR was a thorough technique and could protect patients from postoperative neurological deficit than RIS. Patients in either group could have a satisfying long-term prognosis after surviving from perioperative period. Most patients had reabsorption of residual false-lumen thrombus after anticoagulant therapy.

Objective: To develop and validate a nomogram model to predict postoperative 30-day mortality in acute type A aortic dissection patients receiving total aortic arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk technique. Method: Clinical data on 1,156 consecutive acute type A aortic dissection patients who got total aortic arch replacement using the frozen elephant trunk technique was collected from January 2010 to December 2020. These patients were divided into training and testing cohorts at random with a ratio of 7:3. To predict postoperative 30-day mortality, a nomogram was established in the training set using the logistic regression model. The novel nomogram was then validated in the testing set. The nomogram's calibration and discrimination were evaluated. In addition, we created four machine learning prediction models in the training set. In terms of calibration and discrimination, the nomogram was compared to these machine learning models in testing set. Results: Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter Conclusion: The novel nomogram is a simple and effective tool to predict 30-day mortality rate for acute type A aortic dissection patients undergoing total aortic arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk technique.

Background: The optimal arterial cannulation site for acute aortic dissection repair is unclear, especially for complex arch surgery. Axillary artery cannulation is widely accepted but adding femoral artery cannulation to it was considered to potentially improve perfusion and early outcomes. To clarify this point, a comparison of perioperative outcomes for these two different cannulation strategies was conducted regarding the pathological features of dissection.Methods: From January 2010 to December 2019, 927 consecutive patients underwent a total arch replacement combined with frozen elephant trunk for acute type A aortic dissection. The data, including detailed pathological features, were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Propensity score matching and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used for adjusting confounders that are potentially related to the outcome.Results: A total of 523 patients (56.3%) accepted a dual arterial cannulation (DAC group), and 406 patients (43.7%) received a single axillary artery cannulation (SAC group). In total, 388 pairs of patients were well-matched. Whether before or after adjusting the preoperative characteristics by matching, there were no significant differences in operative mortality (6.7 vs. 5.4%, P = 0.420 before matching; 5.4 vs. 5.4%, P = 1 after matching), stroke (6.7 vs. 5.4%, P = 0.420 before matching; 6.4 vs. 5.2%, P = 0.435 after matching), spinal cord injury (5 vs. 5.7%, P = 0.640 before matching; 5.4 vs. 5.7%, P = 1. After matching), and acute renal failure requiring dialysis (13.8 vs. 9.6%, P =0.050 before matching; 12.6 vs. 9.5%, P = 0.174) between the two groups. Dual arterial cannulation was not an independent protective factor of operative mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55–1.86), stroke (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.65–2.11), spinal cord injury (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.65–2.11), and acute renal failure requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.78–1.97) after adjusting for confounding factors by multivariable logistic regression analysis. In the subgroup analysis, no advantage of dual arterial cannulation was found for a particular population.Conclusions: Single axillary artery cannulation was competent in the complex arch repair for acute aortic dissection, presenting with a satisfactory result as dual arterial cannulation. Adding femoral artery cannulation was necessary when a sufficient flow volume could not be achieved by axillary artery cannulation or when a lower limb malperfusion existed.