Lenin Espin
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Lenin Espin has a total of 9 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Brian Dixon
Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
1 shared publication Carlos Soto
Salmones Camanchaca Diego Portales 2000, 5503642, Puerto Montt, Chile
1 shared publication- Carolina Figueroa
Escuela de Tecnología Médica, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Avenida Universidad 330, Valparaíso 2360100, Chile
1 shared publication - Débora Torrealba
Laborarorio de Nanobiotecnología e Inmunología Marina, Instituto de Ciencias de la Ingeniería, Universidad de O’Higgins, Avenida Libertador Bernardo O’Higgins 611, Rancagua 2841959, Chile
1 shared publication Islam Said Elalfy
Instituto Universitario de Acuicultura Sostenible y Ecosistemas Marinos (IU-ECOAQUA), Grupo de Investigación en Acuicultura (GIA), Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Carretera de Taliarte, s/n, 35214, Telde, Spain
1 shared publication- José Andrés Gallardo
Laboratorio de Genética y Genómica Aplicada, Escuela de Ciencias del Mar, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Avenida Universidad 330, Valparaíso 2373223, Chile
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 26 October 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in Scientific Reports
- Vol. 10 (1) , 1-12
Host genetic variation explains reduced protection of commercial vaccines against Piscirickettsia salmonis in Atlantic salmon
Vaccination is a widely used control strategy to prevent Piscirickettsia salmonis causing disease in salmon farming. However, it is not known why all the currently available commercial vaccines generally fail to protect against this pathogenic bacteria. Here, we report, from two different populations, that between-family variation is a strong intrinsic factor that determines vaccine protection for this disease. While in some full-sib families, the protection added by vaccination increased the survival time in 13 days in comparison with their unvaccinated siblings; in other families, there was no added protection by vaccination or even it was slightly negative. Resistance to P. salmonis, measured as days to death, was higher in vaccinated than unvaccinated fish, but only a moderate positive genetic correlation was obtained between these traits. This disputes a previous hypothesis, that stated that both traits were fully controlled by the same genes, and challenges the use of unvaccinated fish as gold standard for evaluating and selecting fish resistant to P. salmonis, particularly if the offspring will be vaccinated. More studies are necessary to evaluate if variation in the host immune response to vaccination could explain the between-family differences in resistance observed in vaccinated fish.
- 26 October 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in Scientific Reports
- Vol. 10 (1) , 1-12
Open AccessHost genetic variation explains reduced protection of commercial vaccines against Piscirickettsia salmonis in Atlantic salmon
Vaccination is a widely used control strategy to prevent Piscirickettsia salmonis causing disease in salmon farming. However, it is not known why all the currently available commercial vaccines generally fail to protect against this pathogenic bacteria. Here, we report, from two different populations, that between-family variation is a strong intrinsic factor that determines vaccine protection for this disease. While in some full-sib families, the protection added by vaccination increased the survival time in 13 days in comparison with their unvaccinated siblings; in other families, there was no added protection by vaccination or even it was slightly negative. Resistance to P. salmonis, measured as days to death, was higher in vaccinated than unvaccinated fish, but only a moderate positive genetic correlation was obtained between these traits. This disputes a previous hypothesis, that stated that both traits were fully controlled by the same genes, and challenges the use of unvaccinated fish as gold standard for evaluating and selecting fish resistant to P. salmonis, particularly if the offspring will be vaccinated. More studies are necessary to evaluate if variation in the host immune response to vaccination could explain the between-family differences in resistance observed in vaccinated fish.