Guojing Tian

Quantum state preparation is a critical task in quantum computing, particularly in fields such as quantum machine learning, Hamiltonian simulation, and quantum algorithm design. The depth of preparation circuit for the most general state has been optimized to approximately optimal, but the log-depth appears only when the number of ancillary qubits reaches exponential. Actually, few log-depth preparation algorithms assisted by polynomial ancillary qubits have been come up with even for a certain kind of non-uniform state. We focus on the Hamming-Weight-preserving states, defined as $|ψ_{\text{H}}\rangle = \sum_{\text{HW}(x)=k} α_x |x\rangle$, which have leveraged their strength in quantum machine learning. Especially when $k=2$, such Hamming-Weight-preserving states correspond to simple undirected graphs and will be called graph-structured states. Firstly, for the $n$-qubit general graph-structured states with $m$ edges, we propose an algorithm to build the preparation circuit of $O(\log n)$-depth with $O(m)$ ancillary qubits. Specifically for the $n$-qubit tree-structured and grid-structured states, the number of ancillary qubits in the corresponding preparation circuits can be optimized to zero. Next we move to the preparation for the HWP states with $k\geq 3$, and it can be solved in $O(\log{n \choose k})$-depth using $O\left({n \choose k}\right)$ ancillary qubits, while the size keeps $O\big( {n \choose k} \big)$. These depth and size complexities, for any $k \geq 2$, exactly coincide with the lower bounds of $Ω(\log{n \choose k})$-depth and $Ω({n \choose k})$-size that we prove lastly, which confirms the near-optimal efficiency of our algorithms.

In the field of quantum linear system algorithms, quantum computing has realized exponential computational advantages over classical computing. However, the focus has been on square coefficient matrices, with few quantum algorithms addressing non-square matrices. Towards this kind of problems defined by $ Ax = b $ where $ A $$ \in\mathbb{R}^{m \times n} $, we propose a quantum algorithm inspired by the classical multi-row iteration method and provide an explicit quantum circuit based on the quantum comparator and Quantum Random Access Memory (QRAM). The time complexity of our quantum multi-row iteration algorithm is $ O(K \log m) $, with $ K $ representing the number of iteration steps, which demonstrates an exponential speedup compared to the classical version. Based on the convergence of the classical multi-row iteration algorithm, we prove that our quantum algorithm converges faster than the quantum one-row iteration algorithm presented in [Phys. Rev. A, 101, 022322 (2020)]. Moreover, our algorithm places less demand on the coefficient matrix, making it suitable for solving inconsistent systems and quadratic optimization problems.

In the field of quantum linear system algorithms, quantum computing has realized exponential computational advantages over classical computing. However, the focus has been on square coefficient matrices, with few quantum algorithms addressing nonsquare matrices. Towards this kind of problems defined by $Ax=b$ where $A\in {\mathbb{R}}^{m\times n}$, we propose a quantum algorithm inspired by the classical multirow iteration method and provide an explicit quantum circuit based on the quantum comparator and quantum random access memory. The time complexity of our quantum multirow iteration algorithm is $O\left(K{log}_{2}m\right)$, with $K$ representing the number of iteration steps, which demonstrates an exponential speedup compared to the classical version.. Based on the convergence of the classical multirow iteration algorithm, we prove that our quantum algorithm converges faster than the quantum one-row iteration algorithm presented by Shao and Xiang [C. Shao and H. Xiang, Phys. Rev. A 101, 022322 (2020)]. Moreover, our algorithm places less demand on the coefficient matrix, making it suitable for solving inconsistent systems and quadratic optimization problems.

Compared to general quantum states, the sparse states arise more frequently in the field of quantum computation. In this work, we consider the preparation for $n$-qubit sparse quantum states with $s$ non-zero amplitudes and propose two algorithms. The first algorithm uses $O(ns/\log n + n)$ gates, improving upon previous methods by $O(\log n)$. We further establish a matching lower bound for any algorithm which is not amplitude-aware and employs at most $\operatorname{poly}(n)$ ancillary qubits. The second algorithm is tailored for binary strings that exhibit a short Hamiltonian path. An application is the preparation of $U(1)$-invariant state with $k$ down-spins in a chain of length $n$, including Bethe states, for which our algorithm constructs a circuit of size $O\left(\binom{n}{k}\log n\right)$. This surpasses previous results by $O(n/\log n)$ and is close to the lower bound $O\left(\binom{n}{k}\right)$. Both the two algorithms shrink the existing gap theoretically and provide increasing advantages numerically.

The Quantum State Preparation problem aims to prepare an $n$-qubit quantum state $|\psi_v\rangle =\sum_{k=0}^{2^n-1}v_k|k\rangle$ from the initial state $|0\rangle^{\otimes n}$, for a given unit vector $v=(v_0,v_1,v_2,\ldots,v_{2^n-1})^T\in \mathbb{C}^{2^n}$ with $\|v\|_2 = 1$. The problem is of fundamental importance in quantum algorithm design, Hamiltonian simulation and quantum machine learning, yet its circuit depth and size complexity remain open when ancillary qubits are available. In this paper, we study efficient constructions of quantum circuits with $m$ ancillary qubits that can prepare $|\psi_v\rangle$ in depth $\tilde O\left(\frac{2^n}{m+n}+n\right)$and size $O(2^n)$, achieving the optimal value for both measures simultaneously. These results also imply a depth complexity of $\Theta(4^n/(m+n))$ for quantum circuits implementing a general $n$-qubit unitary using $m = O(2^n/n)$ ancillary qubits. This resolves the depth complexity for circuits without ancillary qubits, and for circuits with exponentially many ancillary qubits, this gives a quadratic saving from $O(4^n)$ to $\tilde \Theta(2^n)$. Our circuits are deterministic, prepare the state and carry out the unitary precisely, utilize the ancillary qubits tightly and the depths are optimal in a wide range of parameter regime. The results can be viewed as (optimal) time-space tradeoff bounds, which is not only theoretically interesting, but also practically relevant in the current trend that the number of qubits starts to take off, by showing a way to use a large number of qubits to compensate the short qubit lifetime.

A controlled-not (cnot) circuit is the key gadget for entangling qubits in quantum computing systems. However, the qubit connectivity of noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices is constrained by their limited-connectivity architecture. To improve the performance of cnot circuits on NISQ devices, we investigate the optimization of the size/depth of cnot circuits under the limited-connectivity architecture. We present a method that can optimize the size of any $n$-qubit cnot circuit $O\left(\frac{n^2}{log\delta }\right)$ on any connected graph with minimum degree $\delta$, and prove this bound is optimal for the regular graph. For the near-term sparsely connected structure, we additionally present a method that can optimize the size of any $n$-qubit cnot circuit to below $2n^2$. The numerical experiment shows that our method performs better than state-of-the-art results. Specifically, we present an example to illustrate the applicability of our algorithm. For the grid structure, which is commonly used in current quantum devices, we demonstrate that the depth of any $n$-qubit cnot circuit can be optimized to be linear in $n$ with certain ancillary qubits (ancillas). Experimental results indicate that this method has significant improvements compared with all of the existing methods. We additionally test our algorithms on the five-qubit IBMQ devices, and the experiments show that the measurement results of the optimized circuit with our algorithm are more robust to noise compared with the IBM mapping method.