Janani Rangaswami
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Janani Rangaswami has a total of 91 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Peter Andrew McCullough
McCullough Foundation, Dallas, USA
5 shared publications - Kevin Bryan Lo
Department of Medicine, Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
4 shared publications Peter A. McCullough
Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA; Baylor Jack and Jane Hamilton Heart and Vascular Hospital, Dallas, Texas, USA
4 shared publications- Jerald Pelayo
Department of Medicine, Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
3 shared publications Sandeep Soman
Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA
3 shared publications- Chiadi E. Ndumele
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 28 July 2026
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 154 (4) , 409-412
Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome: A User’s Guide to the Guidelines
- 28 July 2026
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 154 (4) , 409-412
Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome: A User’s Guide to the Guidelines
- Open Access
- 1 August 2024
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Kidney360
- Vol. 5 (8) , 1069-1071
Torsemide Is a More Appropriate Oral Loop Diuretic for Patients with Heart Failure: CON
An abstract is unavailable. This article is available as a PDF only.
- 1 August 2024
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Kidney360
- Vol. 5 (8) , 1069-1071
Open AccessTorsemide Is a More Appropriate Oral Loop Diuretic for Patients with Heart Failure: CON
An abstract is unavailable. This article is available as a PDF only.
- Top Cited Papers
- 6 February 2024
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 149 (6) , 430-449
Development and Validation of the American Heart Association’s PREVENT Equations
BACKGROUND: Multivariable equations are recommended by primary prevention guidelines to assess absolute risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, current equations have several limitations. Therefore, we developed and validated the American Heart Association Predicting Risk of CVD EVENTs (PREVENT) equations among US adults 30 to 79 years of age without known CVD. METHODS: The derivation sample included individual-level participant data from 25 data sets (N=3 281 919) between 1992 and 2017. The primary outcome was CVD (atherosclerotic CVD and heart failure). Predictors included traditional risk factors (smoking status, systolic blood pressure, cholesterol, antihypertensive or statin use, and diabetes) and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Models were sex-specific, race-free, developed on the age scale, and adjusted for competing risk of non-CVD death. Analyses were conducted in each data set and meta-analyzed. Discrimination was assessed using the Harrell C-statistic. Calibration was calculated as the slope of the observed versus predicted risk by decile. Additional equations to predict each CVD subtype (atherosclerotic CVD and heart failure) and include optional predictors (urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio and hemoglobin A1c), and social deprivation index were also developed. External validation was performed in 3 330 085 participants from 21 additional data sets. RESULTS: Among 6 612 004 adults included, mean±SD age was 53±12 years, and 56% were women. Over a mean±SD follow-up of 4.8±3.1 years, there were 211 515 incident total CVD events. The median C-statistics in external validation for CVD were 0.794 (interquartile interval, 0.763–0.809) in female and 0.757 (0.727–0.778) in male participants. The calibration slopes were 1.03 (interquartile interval, 0.81–1.16) and 0.94 (0.81–1.13) among female and male participants, respectively. Similar estimates for discrimination and calibration were observed for atherosclerotic CVD– and heart failure–specific models. The improvement in discrimination was small but statistically significant when urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, hemoglobin A1c, and social deprivation index were added together to the base model to total CVD (ΔC-statistic [interquartile interval] 0.004 [0.004–0.005] and 0.005 [0.004–0.007] among female and male participants, respectively). Calibration improved significantly when the urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio was added to the base model among those with marked albuminuria (>300 mg/g; 1.05 [0.84–1.20] versus 1.39 [1.14–1.65]; P =0.01). CONCLUSIONS: PREVENT equations accurately and precisely predicted risk for incident CVD and CVD subtypes in a large, diverse, and contemporary sample of US adults by using routinely available clinical variables.
- 6 February 2024
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 149 (6) , 430-449
Top Cited PapersDevelopment and Validation of the American Heart Association’s PREVENT Equations
BACKGROUND: Multivariable equations are recommended by primary prevention guidelines to assess absolute risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, current equations have several limitations. Therefore, we developed and validated the American Heart Association Predicting Risk of CVD EVENTs (PREVENT) equations among US adults 30 to 79 years of age without known CVD. METHODS: The derivation sample included individual-level participant data from 25 data sets (N=3 281 919) between 1992 and 2017. The primary outcome was CVD (atherosclerotic CVD and heart failure). Predictors included traditional risk factors (smoking status, systolic blood pressure, cholesterol, antihypertensive or statin use, and diabetes) and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Models were sex-specific, race-free, developed on the age scale, and adjusted for competing risk of non-CVD death. Analyses were conducted in each data set and meta-analyzed. Discrimination was assessed using the Harrell C-statistic. Calibration was calculated as the slope of the observed versus predicted risk by decile. Additional equations to predict each CVD subtype (atherosclerotic CVD and heart failure) and include optional predictors (urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio and hemoglobin A1c), and social deprivation index were also developed. External validation was performed in 3 330 085 participants from 21 additional data sets. RESULTS: Among 6 612 004 adults included, mean±SD age was 53±12 years, and 56% were women. Over a mean±SD follow-up of 4.8±3.1 years, there were 211 515 incident total CVD events. The median C-statistics in external validation for CVD were 0.794 (interquartile interval, 0.763–0.809) in female and 0.757 (0.727–0.778) in male participants. The calibration slopes were 1.03 (interquartile interval, 0.81–1.16) and 0.94 (0.81–1.13) among female and male participants, respectively. Similar estimates for discrimination and calibration were observed for atherosclerotic CVD– and heart failure–specific models. The improvement in discrimination was small but statistically significant when urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, hemoglobin A1c, and social deprivation index were added together to the base model to total CVD (ΔC-statistic [interquartile interval] 0.004 [0.004–0.005] and 0.005 [0.004–0.007] among female and male participants, respectively). Calibration improved significantly when the urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio was added to the base model among those with marked albuminuria (>300 mg/g; 1.05 [0.84–1.20] versus 1.39 [1.14–1.65]; P =0.01). CONCLUSIONS: PREVENT equations accurately and precisely predicted risk for incident CVD and CVD subtypes in a large, diverse, and contemporary sample of US adults by using routinely available clinical variables.
- Open Access
- 11 August 2022
- Published by Elsevier in IJC Heart & Vasculature
- Vol. 42, 101094
Invasive hemodynamic parameters in patients with hepatorenal syndrome
- 11 August 2022
- Published by Elsevier in IJC Heart & Vasculature
- Vol. 42, 101094
Open AccessInvasive hemodynamic parameters in patients with hepatorenal syndrome
- Open Access
- 30 June 2021
- Published by IMR Press in Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
- Vol. 22 (2) , 257-258
Closing gaps in the care of patients with heart-kidney disease: the time is now
- 30 June 2021
- Published by IMR Press in Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
- Vol. 22 (2) , 257-258
Open AccessClosing gaps in the care of patients with heart-kidney disease: the time is now
- 1 June 2021
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of the Medical Sciences
- Vol. 361 (6) , 725-730
Association of Pre-Admission Statin Use With Reduced In-Hospital Mortality in COVID-19
- 1 June 2021
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of the Medical Sciences
- Vol. 361 (6) , 725-730
Association of Pre-Admission Statin Use With Reduced In-Hospital Mortality in COVID-19
- 1 November 2020
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
- Vol. 13 (11) , e007264
Cardio-Renal-Metabolic Care Models
- 1 November 2020
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
- Vol. 13 (11) , e007264
Cardio-Renal-Metabolic Care Models
- 1 November 2020
- Published by American Physiological Society in American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology
- Vol. 319 (5) , F780-F781
SGLT2 inhibitors: diabetic kidney disease and beyond
- 1 November 2020
- Published by American Physiological Society in American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology
- Vol. 319 (5) , F780-F781
SGLT2 inhibitors: diabetic kidney disease and beyond
- Open Access
- 3 July 2020
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Medical Virology
- Vol. 93 (1) , 416-423
Characteristics and clinical outcomes of COVID‐19 patients in an underserved‐inner city population: A single tertiary center cohort
There is limited information describing the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients infected with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) especially those in underserved urban area with minority population in the United States. This is a retrospective single‐center study for patients who were admitted with COVID‐19 infection. Data collection was from 1 March through 24 April 2020. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and treatment data were presented using descriptive statistics and frequencies. The χ2 test and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine association of risk factors and clinical outcomes. A total of 242 inpatients were included with a mean age of 66 ± 14.75 (±standard deviation). A total of 50% were female and 70% were African American. Comorbidities included hypertension (74%), diabetes mellitus (49%), and 19% had either COPD or asthma. Older age was associated with higher risk of inpatient death odds ratio (OR): 1.056 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.023‐1.090; P = .001). Inpatient mortality occurred in 70% who needed mechanical ventilation (OR: 29.51; 95% CI: 13.28‐65.60; P < .0001), 58% who required continuous renal replacement therapy/hemodialysis (CRRT/HD) (OR: 6.63; 95% CI: 2.74‐16.05; P < .0001), and 69% who needed vasopressors (OR: 30.64; 95% CI: 13.56‐69.20; P < .0001). Amongst biomarkers of disease severity, only baseline CRP levels (145 ± 116 mg/L) were associated with mortality OR: 1.008 (95% CI: 1.003‐1.012; P = .002). Majority of hospitalized patients had hypertension and diabetes. Older age was an independent risk factor for inpatient mortality. Requirement of mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use, and CRRT/HD was associated significantly with inpatient mortality. Higher baseline CRP was significantly associated with inpatient death.
- 3 July 2020
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Medical Virology
- Vol. 93 (1) , 416-423
Open AccessCharacteristics and clinical outcomes of COVID‐19 patients in an underserved‐inner city population: A single tertiary center cohort
There is limited information describing the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients infected with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) especially those in underserved urban area with minority population in the United States. This is a retrospective single‐center study for patients who were admitted with COVID‐19 infection. Data collection was from 1 March through 24 April 2020. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and treatment data were presented using descriptive statistics and frequencies. The χ2 test and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine association of risk factors and clinical outcomes. A total of 242 inpatients were included with a mean age of 66 ± 14.75 (±standard deviation). A total of 50% were female and 70% were African American. Comorbidities included hypertension (74%), diabetes mellitus (49%), and 19% had either COPD or asthma. Older age was associated with higher risk of inpatient death odds ratio (OR): 1.056 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.023‐1.090; P = .001). Inpatient mortality occurred in 70% who needed mechanical ventilation (OR: 29.51; 95% CI: 13.28‐65.60; P < .0001), 58% who required continuous renal replacement therapy/hemodialysis (CRRT/HD) (OR: 6.63; 95% CI: 2.74‐16.05; P < .0001), and 69% who needed vasopressors (OR: 30.64; 95% CI: 13.56‐69.20; P < .0001). Amongst biomarkers of disease severity, only baseline CRP levels (145 ± 116 mg/L) were associated with mortality OR: 1.008 (95% CI: 1.003‐1.012; P = .002). Majority of hospitalized patients had hypertension and diabetes. Older age was an independent risk factor for inpatient mortality. Requirement of mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use, and CRRT/HD was associated significantly with inpatient mortality. Higher baseline CRP was significantly associated with inpatient death.