Qiuhong Zhao

Background: Multiple Myeloma (MM) remains the most common indication for Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT). ASCT use is disproportionately lower in older adults, Black patients with MM, as well as those living in rural areas and of low socioeconomic status (SES). Low utilization of ASCT is linked to poor outcomes. There are numerous barriers to ASCT access and limited interventions to address disparate outcomes in patients with MM. Methods: This is an ambispective study conducted at a single institution to identify and mitigate barriers to ASCT utilization. In aim one, we retrospectively evaluated ASCT utilization and overall survival (OS) for MM patients accounting for clinical, geographic (Rural Urban Commuting Area—RUCA), and socioeconomic factors (Yost). In aim two, based on the observations of the retrospective study, we conducted a prospective feasibility study to improve access for vulnerable patients with MM (older adults, Black patients, rural and/or Appalachian residence) using a virtual ASCT consultative model with patient navigation, coordinated with local oncology centers. Poisson regression estimated the relative risk of receiving ASCT. OS was calculated from MM diagnosis to the date of death censoring survivors at last contact and analyzed using Kaplan-Meir. Cox proportional hazard models estimated the hazard ratio for risk of death. The multivariable model was built including significant risk factors from the univariable models to estimate the independent effect of each risk factor. Results: Among 1799 patients, median age of diagnosis was 61 (range 17–87), race was self-identified as White (85.6%), Black (13.1%), or other (1.3%) and it was primarily metropolitan (n = 1205, 71.2%) and 1169 (65%) received a transplant. The hazard of death was lower for those who received a transplant (vs. no transplant, HR = 0.63, 95%CI 0.53–0.74, p < 0.001), patients identified as Black (vs. White, HR = 0.66, 95%CI 0.51–0.85, p = 0.001) and higher SES areas (quartile 2–4 vs. quartile 1, HR = 0.69, 95%CI 0.58–0.83, p < 0.001). Prospectively with patient navigation and virtual consultation (n = 35), half of the patients sought virtual consultation, 68% of patients were eligible for transplant, 43% went on to receive ASCT, of which 42% of patients were non-metropolitan and 15% of patients were from an Appalachian county. Using this strategy, no difference was observed in ASCT utilization by age (31% in age > 70 vs. 45% in age 65–70 vs. 78% in age < 65, p = 0.10), geographical area (47% in metro vs. 50% in non-metro, p = 0.99), or race (46% in White vs. 60% in Black, p = 0.66). Conclusions: Implementing patient navigation and virtual transplant consultation can effectively enhance access to ASCT among underserved MM populations while reducing the influence of racial and geographic differences.

Background: Decitabine efficacy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) may be enhanced by the pharmacologic upregulation of microRNA miR-29b, a regulator of DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) expression. Bortezomib and sorafenib have been shown preclinically to increase miR-29b levels, providing a biologically informed strategy to sensitize leukemic blasts to DNMT inhibition. Objectives: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, biological activity, and preliminary efficacy of combining bortezomib and sorafenib followed by decitabine in patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory AML. Methods: This phase I, dose-escalation study enrolled 15 patients (11 untreated, 4 relapsed/refractory) who received fixed-dose bortezomib and sorafenib across three dose levels prior to decitabine. Dose escalation was guided by dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and an increase in miR-29b expression. Results: The regimen was generally well tolerated with the most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events of hypertension and febrile neutropenia. At the highest dose level, a ≥2-fold increase in miR-29b expression was observed in two of the six evaluable patients. The overall response rate was 33.3%, with clinical responses observed in both newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory patients. However, changes in miR-29b expression did not consistently correlate with clinical response. Conclusions: Sequential treatment with bortezomib and sorafenib followed by decitabine is feasible and demonstrates acceptable safety in AML. Although the biologic modulation of miR-29b was variable, this trial provides a proof of concept for pharmacodynamic-guided dose finding in epigenetic therapy combinations.

Background—Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is integral to the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), although its absolute necessity in first remission has been recently questioned. We report real-world factors that influence clinical decision-making and outcomes from ASCT in 733 patients with MM. Results—Similar to recent prospective data, we found a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit with early versus deferred ASCT (median PFS of 5.1 years versus 2.6 years, p < 0.001); however, there was no significant difference in overall survival (median OS of 8.3 years and 8.6 years, p = 0.21). Patient preference, age, marital status, body mass index, and comorbidities influence ASCT timing. Conclusion—These findings highlight the emerging role of an individualized, shared decision-making model regarding the timing of ASCT between patients and physicians with the myriad of treatment options available in the contemporary era.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is a potentially curative treatment for many hematological disorders, but is often complicated by relapse of the underlying disease, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and infectious complications. We conducted a retrospective analysis on patients undergoing allo-SCT from 1984 to 2018 to better understand how survival has changed longitudinally with therapeutic advancements made to mitigate these complications. Method: We analyzed data from 1943 consecutive patients who received allo-SCT. Patients were divided into groups (gps) based on the year (yr) of transplant. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS). Secondary endpoints were the cumulative incidences of grade II–IV and grade III–IV acute GVHD (aGVHD), chronic GVHD (cGVHD), and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Results: Our study found statistically significant improvements in OS, PFS, and GRFS. Five-year PFS among the groups increased from 24% to 48% over the years. Five-year OS increased from 25% to 53%. Five-year GRFS significantly increased from 6% to 14%, but remained relatively unchanged from 2004 to 2018. Cumulative incidences of grade II–IV aGVHD increased since 2009 (p < 0.001). However, cumulative incidence of NRM decreased since 2004 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our data show improved OS, PFS, and GRFS post allo-SCT over decades. This may be attributed to advances in supportive care and treatments focused on mitigation of GVHD and relapse.

Maintenance therapy after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) is the standard treatment and recommended to be continued until disease progression. However, in the real world, patients discontinue treatment due to various reasons. We sought to determine the effect of early versus late discontinuation on survival outcomes in MM patients who underwent ASCT at The Ohio State University. We retrospectively reviewed 340 patients who underwent ASCT from 2005 to 2016 and received maintenance therapy for at least six months without progression. We compared the outcomes of patients who received maintenance for three years or less (early group) to the patients who continued maintenance beyond three years (late group). Lenalidomide (89%) and bortezomib (10%) were the most common agents used for maintenance chemotherapy. In Kaplan–Meier analysis, patients in the late group had prolonged progression-free (PFS) (p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001). The 5-year estimated OS in late group was 96% vs. 79% in the early group and 5-year PFS was 80% in late group vs. 50% in the early group. The most common reasons for discontinuation of maintenance in early group were adverse events (55.9%) and patient preference (22.5%). For the late group, it was disease progression (23.9%) and adverse events (14.3%). Fifty-five percent of patients in the late group were still on maintenance treatment at the last follow-up. Continuation of maintenance therapy was thus associated with improved outcomes, while adverse events prevented most patients from continuing treatment.

Amyloidosis is a rare, systemic disease that can result in significant functional impairment. Specific guidelines for the rehabilitation assessment of amyloidosis patients have yet to be established. The purpose of this study was to identify functional deficits and assess differences based on disease type, organ involvement, age, and gender of patients with amyloidosis. Materials and Methods: The multidisciplinary Comprehensive Amyloidosis Clinic (CAC) at Ohio State University (OSU) has developed structured assessment guidelines for amyloidosis patients. A retrospective, single-institution review of patients assessed in CAC between December 2017 and April 2020 was performed. Outcome measure data from the Timed Up and Go (TUG), 30 s sit-to-stand, and physical function portion of the SF 36 were gathered by chart review. Comparisons were made between CAC patient scores and normative data. Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to compare scores across the disease types (light chain, transthyretin wild-type, and hereditary variant transthyretin) and the Mann–Whitney U test was used for pairwise comparisons within disease types and cardiac involvement. Linear regression models were used to assess associations between patient characteristics (including age, gender, disease type, and cardiac involvement) and performance scores. Results: Data from sixty-four patients was evaluated. On the 30-s sit-to-stand test, patients with light chain amyloidosis performed 3.32 fewer repetitions than patients with transthyretin wild-type, p = 0.03. Patients with cardiac involvement had 2.55 fewer repetitions than patients without cardiac involvement, p = 0.03. Older patients were found to have slower TUG performance, and a 10-year increase in age was associated with an 11% increase in TUG scores. Conclusions: Findings indicate patients with light chain amyloidosis and patients with cardiac involvement, when compared to other amyloidosis patients, present with more physical impairments.

Multiple myeloma (MM) represents 1.8% of all new cancer cases in the U.S. While not curable, advances in treatment, including autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and maintenance therapy, have dramatically improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We performed a retrospective survival analysis on newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients receiving ASCT from 1992–2016 at the Ohio State University. A total of 1001 consecutive NDMM patients were eligible. Patients were split into five groups based on historic changes in novel agents for the treatment of MM. Across the years (1992–2016), there was a statistically significant improvement in both PFS (p < 0.01) and OS (p < 0.01). Significant improvements in both PFS and OS were seen in patients ≤65 years (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002) and >65 years old (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001), respectively. Improved PFS and OS were seen in both standard-risk (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001) and high-risk patients (p < 0.001 and p = 0.019). The post-transplant response showed statistically significant improvement across the years (p < 0.01). Survival rates for NDMM patients have significantly improved primarily due to the inclusion of novel therapies and post-ASCT maintenance.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most clinically significant infection after allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and is associated with increased mortality. The risk for CMV reactivation increases with graft versus host disease (GVHD). GVHD contributes to significant morbidity and mortality and is treated with immunosuppressive therapies that can further increase CMV infection risk. Prophylaxis with letermovir, an oral antiviral approved to prevent CMV, has been shown to decrease the incidence of CMV infection post-allo-HCT in patients at high risk of CMV reactivation, but there is a lack of data confirming this benefit in patients with GVHD. In this single-center, retrospective study, we assessed the incidence of clinically significant CMV infection (CS-CMVi) in allo-HCT patients who received letermovir prophylaxis (n = 119) and who developed aGVHD compared to a control group (n = 143) who did not receive letermovir. Among aGVHD patients, letermovir prophylaxis decreased CS-CMVi in patients with aGVHD (HR 0.08 [95% CI 0.03–0.27], p < 0.001), reduced non-relapsed mortality (p = 0.04) and improved overall survival (p = 0.04). This data suggests that letermovir prophylaxis improves outcomes by preventing CS-CMVi in patients with aGVHD.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) from a haploidentical (haplo) donor has emerged as a suitable alternative in the absence of a matched donor. However, haplo-HCT patients have a higher risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Hence, bone marrow (BM) stem cell source and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) have been routinely used to help mitigate this. Due to ease of collection, peripheral blood (PB) stem cells are increasingly being considered for haplo-HCT. We retrospectively analyzed 74 patients (42 BM and 32 PB) who underwent haplo-HCT at Ohio State University from 2009 to 2018. Median age at transplant was 60 years (yrs) for BM and 54 yrs for PB, (p = 0.45). There was no difference in OS (p = 0.13) and NRM (p = 0.75) as well as PFS (p = 0.10) or GRFS (p = 0.90) between the groups. The BM cohort showed a 3-year OS rate of 63% (95% confidence interval (CI): 46–76), and 3-year PFS of 49% (95% CI: 33–63). For the PB group, 3-year OS and PFS were 78% (95% CI: 59–89) and 68% (95% CI: 49–82), respectively. There were no differences in the incidence of acute GVHD (grade II-IV) (p = 0.31) and chronic GVHD (p = 0.18). Patients receiving BM had a significantly higher risk for relapse with relapse rates by 2 years at 36% (95% CI: 22–50) vs. 16% (95% CI: 6–31) for PB (p = 0.03). The findings from this study suggest that PB is an excellent alternative to BM for haplo-HCT.