Junior Vitorino Fandim
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Junior Vitorino Fandim has a total of 73 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Bruno Tirotti Saragiotto
Masters and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy; Universidade Cidade de São Paulo; Sao Paulo Brazil
7 shared publications Bruno Tirotti Saragiotto
3 shared publications- Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa
Masters and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
3 shared publications Bruno T. Saragiotto
Masters and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID), São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Discipline of Physiotherapy, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
2 shared publications- Felipe Jose Jandre Reis
Postgraduate Program in Science, Technology, and Innovation in Health, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Rio de Janeiro (IFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
2 shared publications - Iuri Fioratti
Masters and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 20 July 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
- Vol. 30 (5)
Exploring equity in telehealth interventions in physiotherapy: A meta-epidemiological study
- 20 July 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
- Vol. 30 (5)
Exploring equity in telehealth interventions in physiotherapy: A meta-epidemiological study
- Open Access
- 22 June 2026
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Pain
- Vol. 47, 106368
Terminology and core components of co-design intervention in chronic pain management: An international Delphi study
- 22 June 2026
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Pain
- Vol. 47, 106368
Open AccessTerminology and core components of co-design intervention in chronic pain management: An international Delphi study
- Open Access
- 30 April 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 196, 112309
Automated approaches to identifying clinical trials based on title and abstract in the field of physiotherapy: a comparative analysis
- 30 April 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 196, 112309
Open AccessAutomated approaches to identifying clinical trials based on title and abstract in the field of physiotherapy: a comparative analysis
- Open Access
- 18 March 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
- Vol. 24 (1)
Cost-effectiveness of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) versus direct amniocentesis for screening of fetal chromosomal aneuploidies in Brazilian private health system
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has emerged as a highly accurate screening modality for fetal aneuploidies. However, its cost-effectiveness in resourc
- 18 March 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
- Vol. 24 (1)
Open AccessCost-effectiveness of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) versus direct amniocentesis for screening of fetal chromosomal aneuploidies in Brazilian private health system
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has emerged as a highly accurate screening modality for fetal aneuploidies. However, its cost-effectiveness in resourc
- 20 August 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in European Journal of Physiotherapy
- Vol. 28 (4) , 1-15
Telehealth in physiotherapy is moving towards equitable authorship: a bibliometric study
- 20 August 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in European Journal of Physiotherapy
- Vol. 28 (4) , 1-15
Telehealth in physiotherapy is moving towards equitable authorship: a bibliometric study
- Open Access
- 9 December 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
- Vol. 75, 103244
Defining core competencies for telehealth in healthcare higher education: A Delphi study
- 9 December 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
- Vol. 75, 103244
Open AccessDefining core competencies for telehealth in healthcare higher education: A Delphi study
- Open Access
- 3 October 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
- Vol. 24 (1) , 1-15
One step at a time. Shaping consensus on research priorities and terminology in telehealth in musculoskeletal pain: an international modified e-Delphi study
Telehealth has emerged as an alternative model for treatment delivery and has become an important component of health service delivery. However, there is inconsistency in the use of terminologies and a lack of research priorities in telehealth in musculoskeletal pain. The purpose of this international, multidisciplinary expert panel assembled in a modified three-round e-Delphi survey is to achieve a consensus on research priorities and for the standard terminology for musculoskeletal pain telehealth practice. In this international modified e-Delphi survey, we invited an expert panel consisting of researchers, clinicians, consumer representatives, industry partners, healthcare managers, and policymakers to participate in a three-round e-Delphi. Expert panels were identified through the Expertscape website, PubMed database, social media, and a snowball approach. In Round 1, potential research priorities and terminologies were presented to panel members. Panel members rated the agreement of each research priority on a 5-point Likert scale and an 11-point numerical scale, and each terminology on a 5-point Likert scale for the "telehealth in musculoskeletal pain " field over rounds. At least 80% of the panel members were required to agree to be deemed a consensus. We analyzed the data descriptively and assessed the stability of the results using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. We performed an international e-Delphi survey from February to August 2022. Of 694 invited people, 160 panel members participated in the first round, 133 in the second round (83% retention), and 134 in the third round (84% retention). Most of the panel members were researchers 76 (47%), clinicians 57 (36%), and consumer representatives 9 (6%) of both genders especially from Brazil 31 (19%), India 22 (14%), and Australia 19 (12%) in the first round. The panel identified fourteen telehealth research priorities spanned topics including the development of strategies using information and communication technology, telehealth implementation services, the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telehealth interventions, equity of telehealth interventions, qualitative research and eHealth literacy in musculoskeletal pain conditions from an initial list of 20 research priorities. The consensus was reached for "digital health" and "telehealth" as standard terminologies from an initial list of 37 terminologies. An international, multidisciplinary expert consensus recommends that future research should consider the 14 research priorities for telehealth musculoskeletal pain reached. Additionally, the terms digital health and telehealth as the most appropriate terminologies to be used in musculoskeletal telehealth research. Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/tqmz2/).
- 3 October 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
- Vol. 24 (1) , 1-15
Open AccessOne step at a time. Shaping consensus on research priorities and terminology in telehealth in musculoskeletal pain: an international modified e-Delphi study
Telehealth has emerged as an alternative model for treatment delivery and has become an important component of health service delivery. However, there is inconsistency in the use of terminologies and a lack of research priorities in telehealth in musculoskeletal pain. The purpose of this international, multidisciplinary expert panel assembled in a modified three-round e-Delphi survey is to achieve a consensus on research priorities and for the standard terminology for musculoskeletal pain telehealth practice. In this international modified e-Delphi survey, we invited an expert panel consisting of researchers, clinicians, consumer representatives, industry partners, healthcare managers, and policymakers to participate in a three-round e-Delphi. Expert panels were identified through the Expertscape website, PubMed database, social media, and a snowball approach. In Round 1, potential research priorities and terminologies were presented to panel members. Panel members rated the agreement of each research priority on a 5-point Likert scale and an 11-point numerical scale, and each terminology on a 5-point Likert scale for the "telehealth in musculoskeletal pain " field over rounds. At least 80% of the panel members were required to agree to be deemed a consensus. We analyzed the data descriptively and assessed the stability of the results using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. We performed an international e-Delphi survey from February to August 2022. Of 694 invited people, 160 panel members participated in the first round, 133 in the second round (83% retention), and 134 in the third round (84% retention). Most of the panel members were researchers 76 (47%), clinicians 57 (36%), and consumer representatives 9 (6%) of both genders especially from Brazil 31 (19%), India 22 (14%), and Australia 19 (12%) in the first round. The panel identified fourteen telehealth research priorities spanned topics including the development of strategies using information and communication technology, telehealth implementation services, the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telehealth interventions, equity of telehealth interventions, qualitative research and eHealth literacy in musculoskeletal pain conditions from an initial list of 20 research priorities. The consensus was reached for "digital health" and "telehealth" as standard terminologies from an initial list of 37 terminologies. An international, multidisciplinary expert consensus recommends that future research should consider the 14 research priorities for telehealth musculoskeletal pain reached. Additionally, the terms digital health and telehealth as the most appropriate terminologies to be used in musculoskeletal telehealth research. Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/tqmz2/).
- 2 August 2023
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Disability and Rehabilitation
- Vol. 46 (14) , 2966-2978
Effectiveness of kinesio taping for chronic stroke patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis
Kinesio taping (KT) is an approach that has been used in the rehabilitation of patients with chronic stroke. The aim of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of KT alone or combined with other interventions for patients with chronic stroke. The search was performed on CENTRAL, EMBASE, PEDro, and five other databases and two trial registries up to July 2022. We included randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effectiveness of KT compared to control interventions. The primary outcomes were upper limb function and gait. We assessed the risk of bias in the included studies using the PEDro scale. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. We included 14 RCTs undertaken in six different countries. PEDro score ranged from 4 to 9 points. There is very-low certainty evidence that KT has no effect on gait, balance, and postural control. We found very-low certainty evidence of a slightly benefit when used in addition to other therapies for gait, balance and postural control, and pain intensity. Our study findings show KT does not have enough robust evidence for improving upper limb function, gait, balance and postural control, and pain intensity in chronic stroke patients.Implications for rehabilitationKinesio taping (KT) is a method that has gained popularity among some health professionals to treat patients poststroke.There is very-low certainty evidence that KT alone has no effect on gait, balance and postural control compared to no treatment.There is very-low certainty evidence that KT plus other therapies may be slightly beneficial for gait, balance and postural control, and pain intensity intervention.Only one study reported there were no adverse events such as skin reactions or local ulceration for patients poststroke.
- 2 August 2023
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Disability and Rehabilitation
- Vol. 46 (14) , 2966-2978
Effectiveness of kinesio taping for chronic stroke patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis
Kinesio taping (KT) is an approach that has been used in the rehabilitation of patients with chronic stroke. The aim of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of KT alone or combined with other interventions for patients with chronic stroke. The search was performed on CENTRAL, EMBASE, PEDro, and five other databases and two trial registries up to July 2022. We included randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effectiveness of KT compared to control interventions. The primary outcomes were upper limb function and gait. We assessed the risk of bias in the included studies using the PEDro scale. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. We included 14 RCTs undertaken in six different countries. PEDro score ranged from 4 to 9 points. There is very-low certainty evidence that KT has no effect on gait, balance, and postural control. We found very-low certainty evidence of a slightly benefit when used in addition to other therapies for gait, balance and postural control, and pain intensity. Our study findings show KT does not have enough robust evidence for improving upper limb function, gait, balance and postural control, and pain intensity in chronic stroke patients.Implications for rehabilitationKinesio taping (KT) is a method that has gained popularity among some health professionals to treat patients poststroke.There is very-low certainty evidence that KT alone has no effect on gait, balance and postural control compared to no treatment.There is very-low certainty evidence that KT plus other therapies may be slightly beneficial for gait, balance and postural control, and pain intensity intervention.Only one study reported there were no adverse events such as skin reactions or local ulceration for patients poststroke.
- 18 January 2023
- Published by Universidade Estadual De Goias in Movimenta (ISSN 1984-4298)
- Vol. 15 (3) , e20220045
ENSINO HÍBRIDO NA FISIOTERAPIA NO BRASIL: UMA REFLEXÃO A METODOLOGIA DE ENSINO
- 18 January 2023
- Published by Universidade Estadual De Goias in Movimenta (ISSN 1984-4298)
- Vol. 15 (3) , e20220045
ENSINO HÍBRIDO NA FISIOTERAPIA NO BRASIL: UMA REFLEXÃO A METODOLOGIA DE ENSINO