Lauriane Onfroy
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Lauriane Onfroy has a total of 23 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Céline Galés
INSERM, UMR 1297, Institut des Maladies Métaboliques et Cardiovasculaires (I2MC), Université de Toulouse, France
3 shared publications - Jean-Michel Senard
INSERM, UMR 1297, Institut des Maladies Métaboliques et Cardiovasculaires, Université de Toulouse
2 shared publications Ségolène Galandrin
Institut des Maladies Métaboliques et Cardiovasculaires, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, U1048, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
2 shared publicationsAude Saulière
The Institut des Maladies Métaboliques et Cardiovasculaires, INSERM, U1048, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, 31432 Toulouse, France
1 shared publication- Audrey Ferrand
I2MC, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
1 shared publication Céline M'KAdmi
From the Institut des Biomolécules Max Mousseron, UMR 5247 CNRS-Université Montpellier-ENSCM, Faculté de Pharmacie, 15 Avenue Charles Flahault, BP 14491, 34093 Montpellier Cedex 05
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Colon Fibroblasts and Inflammation: Sparring Partners in Colorectal Cancer Initiation?
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related death. Significant improvements in CRC treatment have been made for the last 20 years, on one hand thanks to a better detection, allowing surgical resection of the incriminated area, and on the other hand, thanks to a better knowledge of CRC’s development allowing the improvement of drug strategies. Despite this crucial progress, CRC remains a public health issue. The current model for CRC initiation and progression is based on accumulation of sequential known genetic mutations in the colon epithelial cells’ genome leading to a loss of control over proliferation and survival. However, increasing evidence reveals that CRC initiation is more complex. Indeed, chronic inflammatory contexts, such as inflammatory bowel diseases, have been shown to increase the risk for CRC development in mice and humans. In this manuscript, we review whether colon fibroblasts can go from the main regulators of the ISC homeostasis, regulating not only the renewal process but also the epithelial cells’ differentiation occurring along the colon crypt, to the main player in the initiation of the colorectal cancer process due to chronic inflammation.
Open AccessColon Fibroblasts and Inflammation: Sparring Partners in Colorectal Cancer Initiation?
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related death. Significant improvements in CRC treatment have been made for the last 20 years, on one hand thanks to a better detection, allowing surgical resection of the incriminated area, and on the other hand, thanks to a better knowledge of CRC’s development allowing the improvement of drug strategies. Despite this crucial progress, CRC remains a public health issue. The current model for CRC initiation and progression is based on accumulation of sequential known genetic mutations in the colon epithelial cells’ genome leading to a loss of control over proliferation and survival. However, increasing evidence reveals that CRC initiation is more complex. Indeed, chronic inflammatory contexts, such as inflammatory bowel diseases, have been shown to increase the risk for CRC development in mice and humans. In this manuscript, we review whether colon fibroblasts can go from the main regulators of the ISC homeostasis, regulating not only the renewal process but also the epithelial cells’ differentiation occurring along the colon crypt, to the main player in the initiation of the colorectal cancer process due to chronic inflammation.
- Open Access
- 11 August 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in Scientific Reports
- Vol. 7 (1) , 1-14
G protein stoichiometry dictates biased agonism through distinct receptor-G protein partitioning
Biased agonism at G protein coupled receptors emerges as an opportunity for development of drugs with enhanced benefit/risk balance making biased ligand identification a priority. However, ligand biased signature, classically inferred from ligand activity across multiple pathways, displays high variability in recombinant systems. Functional assays usually necessity receptor/effector overexpression that should be controlled among assays to allow comparison but this calibration currently fails. Herein, we demonstrate that Gα expression level dictates the biased profiling of agonists and, to a lesser extent of β-blockers, in a Gα isoform- and receptor-specific way, depending on specific G protein activity in different membrane territories. These results have major therapeutic implications since they suggest that the ligand bias phenotype is not necessarily maintained in pathological cell background characterized by fluctuations in G protein expression. Thus, we recommend implementation of G protein stoichiometry as a new parameter in biased ligand screening programs.
- 11 August 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in Scientific Reports
- Vol. 7 (1) , 1-14
Open AccessG protein stoichiometry dictates biased agonism through distinct receptor-G protein partitioning
Biased agonism at G protein coupled receptors emerges as an opportunity for development of drugs with enhanced benefit/risk balance making biased ligand identification a priority. However, ligand biased signature, classically inferred from ligand activity across multiple pathways, displays high variability in recombinant systems. Functional assays usually necessity receptor/effector overexpression that should be controlled among assays to allow comparison but this calibration currently fails. Herein, we demonstrate that Gα expression level dictates the biased profiling of agonists and, to a lesser extent of β-blockers, in a Gα isoform- and receptor-specific way, depending on specific G protein activity in different membrane territories. These results have major therapeutic implications since they suggest that the ligand bias phenotype is not necessarily maintained in pathological cell background characterized by fluctuations in G protein expression. Thus, we recommend implementation of G protein stoichiometry as a new parameter in biased ligand screening programs.
- 1 August 2016
- Published by Elsevier in The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology
- Vol. 77, 251-263
Delineating biased ligand efficacy at 7TM receptors from an experimental perspective
- 1 August 2016
- Published by Elsevier in The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology
- Vol. 77, 251-263
Delineating biased ligand efficacy at 7TM receptors from an experimental perspective
- Open Access
- 1 November 2015
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Vol. 290 (45) , 27021-27039
Agonism, Antagonism, and Inverse Agonism Bias at the Ghrelin Receptor Signaling
- 1 November 2015
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Vol. 290 (45) , 27021-27039
Open AccessAgonism, Antagonism, and Inverse Agonism Bias at the Ghrelin Receptor Signaling