Zhi Q. Yao

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) establishes distinct latency programs that drive B-cell transformation through coordinated viral and host gene regulation. However, the contribution of host long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) to EBV-mediated pathogenesis remains poorly understood. Here, we performed transcriptome-wide lncRNA profiling comparing Type I and Type III EBV latency and identified differentially expressed host lncRNAs, among which we characterized a previously unannotated natural antisense transcript (NAT) of IRF4, designated IRF4-AS1. IRF4-AS1 is markedly upregulated in Type III latency and positively correlates with IRF4 expression across EBV-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) established from diverse clinical backgrounds. Functional studies indicate a context-dependent positive regulatory relationship between IRF4-AS1 and IRF4. While overexpression of IRF4-AS1 increased IRF4 expression and IRF4 overexpression increased IRF4-AS1 levels, loss-of-function analyses suggest that this relationship is modulated by additional regulatory inputs in established transformed cells. In contrast to IRF4, IRF4-AS1 transcription is not regulated by the LMP1-NFκB signaling, indicating that the two transcripts are regulated through partially distinct mechanisms. In addition, we identified MIR3142HG as a highly induced latency-associated lncRNA and found that its embedded miRNAs, miR-146a and miR-3142, exhibited divergent expression patterns, suggesting differential post-transcriptional regulation. Together, these findings identify IRF4-AS1 as a NAT lncRNA for IRF4 and reveal extensive remodeling of host lncRNA networks during EBV latency, providing a foundation for future studies of lncRNA-mediated host-virus interactions in EBV pathogenesis.

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are membrane-bound particles secreted by most cell types that play a pivotal role in intercellular communication via transporting protein, nucleic acid, lipid, and metabolite cargos. Among EVs, exosomes are a well-characterized subtype, typically ranging from 10–150 nm in diameter and originating from the endosomal pathway via the formation of multivesicular bodies that fuse with the plasma membrane. EVs/exosomes can be isolated from various biological fluids and cultured cells, with production and yield influenced by the cell type and culture conditions. Isolation methods, including ultracentrifugation or density-based ultracentrifugation, tangential flow filtration, size-exclusion chromatography, immunoaffinity and membrane-affinity capture, and recently developed commercial equipment, offer distinct advantages and limitations in terms of purity, scalability, and exosome integrity. Characterization techniques, such as nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), Western blotting, flow cytometry, and dynamic light scattering (DLS), assess exosome size, morphology, and biomarker expression. Given their biocompatibility and inherent targeting capabilities across a diverse range of diseases, EVs/exosomes hold clinical promise as diagnostic biomarkers, cell-free therapeutics, drug delivery vehicles, immune modulators, and in regenerative medicine. However, these emerging fields in exosome medicine continue to face challenges in standardizing EV sourcing, production, purification, yield, bio-targeting, drug loading, and drug delivery. While EVs/exosomes represent a rapidly advancing frontier in biomedical science, robust protocols for standardization and scalable production will be essential for their successful translation into clinical applications. This article provides a comprehensive overview of EV/exosome origins, their biological functions, the approaches for their isolation and characterization, and their therapeutic potential.

The lymphocyte-specific transcription factor interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) is a key player in immune evasion in cancers, with the complex mechanism(s) being barely understood. In this study, we have focused on the role of IRF4 in regulating T cell functions through its transcriptional regulation of programmed death 1 (PD1) and its ligand PD1 ligand 1 (PD-L1), which were identified as IRF4 transcriptional targets in multi-omics analysis. We have shown that IRF4 transcriptionally regulates both PD1 and PD-L1, promoting immune suppression in the context of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection. Co-culturing EBV+ JiJoye lymphoma cells with CD4+ T cells or with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) downregulates CD4+ T cell functions, but the depletion of IRF4 in EBV+ JiJoye lymphoma cells reduces PD1 and PD-L1 expression, and partially restores CD4+ T cell functions. Moreover, CD4+ T cell depletion from PBMCs enhances EBV transformation, and EBV has a greater efficiency in transforming PBMCs from HIV patients with impaired CD4+ T cell functions. These findings support the role of IRF4 in immune evasion by upregulating PD1/PD-L1 during EBV transformation, and that functional CD4+ T cells are essential for limiting EBV transformation.

The interplay between long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) is crucial in the epigenetic regulation of mRNA and protein expression, impacting the development and progression of a plethora of human diseases, such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, inflammatory-associated diseases, and viral infection. Among the many lncRNAs, growth arrest-specific 5 (GAS5) has garnered substantial attention for its evident role in the regulation of significant biological processes such as proliferation, differentiation, senescence, and apoptosis. Through miRNA-mediated signaling pathways, GAS5 modulates disease progression in a cell-type-specific manner, typically by influencing proteins involved in inflammation and cell death. While GAS5 is recognized as a tumor suppressor in cancer, recent reports highlight its broader regulatory capacity in non-cancerous diseases. Its modulation of protein expression through the GAS5/miRNA network has been shown to both mitigate and exacerbate disease, depending on the specific context. Furthermore, the therapeutic potential of GAS5 manipulation, via knockdown or overexpression, offers promising avenues for targeted interventions across human diseases. This review explores the dualistic impacts of the GAS5/miRNA network in conditions such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, viral infections, and inflammatory disorders. Through the evaluation of current evidence, we aim to provide insight into GAS5’s biological functions and its implications for future research and therapeutic development.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a common cause of liver disease worldwide. The current antiviral treatment using nucleotide analogues (NAs) can only suppress de novo HBV replication but cannot eliminate chronic HBV infection due to the persistence of covalently closed circular (ccc) DNA that sustains viral replication. The CRISPR/Cas9 system is a novel genome-editing tool that enables precise gene disruption and inactivation. With high efficiency and simplicity, the CRISPR/Cas9 system has been utilized in multiple studies to disrupt the HBV genome specifically, eliciting varying anti-HBV effects both in vitro and in vivo. Additionally, multi-locus gene targeting has shown enhanced antiviral activity, paving the way for combination therapy to disrupt and inactivate HBV cccDNA as well as integrated HBV DNA. Despite its promising antiviral effects, this technology faces several challenges that need to be overcome before its clinical application, i.e., off-target effects and in vivo drug delivery. As such, there is a need for improvement in CRISPR/Cas9 efficiency, specificity, versatility, and delivery. Here, we critically review the recent literature describing the tools employed in designing guide RNAs (gRNAs) targeting HBV genomes, the vehicles used for expressing and delivering CRISPR/Cas9 components, the models used for evaluating CRISPR-mediated HBV gene disruption, the methods used for assessing antiviral and off-target effects induced by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated HBV gene disruption, and the prospects of future directions and challenges in leveraging this HBV gene-editing approach, to advance the HBV treatment toward a clinical cure.