E. M. Stewart
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
E. M. Stewart has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Christopher Matthew Julian1 shared publication
Jay J. Ague
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Yale University, 210 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA
1 shared publication- Jay. J. Ague
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Yale University; Yale Peabody Museum, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
1 shared publication - Ji-Lei Li
Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources Institute of Geology and Geophysics Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China
1 shared publication Jun Gao
1 shared publication- Timm John
Institute of Geological Sciences Freie Universität Berlin Berlin Germany
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 22 September 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Earth and Planetary Science Advances
- Vol. 1 (4)
Petrological modeling of sulfur cycling at active coronae on Venus
- 22 September 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Earth and Planetary Science Advances
- Vol. 1 (4)
Open AccessPetrological modeling of sulfur cycling at active coronae on Venus
- 13 September 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Earth and Planetary Science Letters
- Vol. 646
Metasedimentary “carbon filter” and its implication for subduction zone carbon recycling
- 13 September 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Earth and Planetary Science Letters
- Vol. 646
Metasedimentary “carbon filter” and its implication for subduction zone carbon recycling
- Open Access
- 4 December 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 11 (1) , 1-8
Pervasive subduction zone devolatilization recycles CO2 into the forearc
The fate of subducted CO2remains the subject of widespread disagreement, with different models predicting either wholesale (up to 99%) decarbonation of the subducting slab or extremely limited carbon loss and, consequently, massive deep subduction of CO2. The fluid history of subducted rocks lies at the heart of this debate: rocks that experience significant infiltration by a water-bearing fluid may release orders of magnitude more CO2than rocks that are metamorphosed in a closed chemical system. Numerical models make a wide range of predictions regarding water mobility, and further progress has been limited by a lack of direct observations. Here we present a comprehensive field-based study of decarbonation efficiency in a subducting slab (Cyclades, Greece), and show that ~40% to ~65% of the CO2in subducting crust is released via metamorphic decarbonation reactions at forearc depths. This result precludes extensive deep subduction of most CO2and suggests that the mantle has become more depleted in carbon over geologic time.
- 4 December 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 11 (1) , 1-8
Open AccessPervasive subduction zone devolatilization recycles CO2 into the forearc
The fate of subducted CO2remains the subject of widespread disagreement, with different models predicting either wholesale (up to 99%) decarbonation of the subducting slab or extremely limited carbon loss and, consequently, massive deep subduction of CO2. The fluid history of subducted rocks lies at the heart of this debate: rocks that experience significant infiltration by a water-bearing fluid may release orders of magnitude more CO2than rocks that are metamorphosed in a closed chemical system. Numerical models make a wide range of predictions regarding water mobility, and further progress has been limited by a lack of direct observations. Here we present a comprehensive field-based study of decarbonation efficiency in a subducting slab (Cyclades, Greece), and show that ~40% to ~65% of the CO2in subducting crust is released via metamorphic decarbonation reactions at forearc depths. This result precludes extensive deep subduction of most CO2and suggests that the mantle has become more depleted in carbon over geologic time.