Ignacio García-Bolao

Aims: Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation by pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) are increasingly performed as standalone procedures. Given that PVI and LAAC share the same access route, a combined approach of pulsed field ablation (PFA)-based PVI and LAAC might be beneficial. The COCONUT study focused on safety, efficacy, and outcomes combining PVI by PFA with LAAC in one procedure. Methods: This is a retrospective, multinational registry study. The primary endpoints were the following: (1) primary safety endpoint: serious adverse events; and (2) primary efficacy endpoint: success of PVI and LAA closure defined as the ability to isolate all pulmonary veins and the successful closure of the LAA. For secondary endpoints, peri-procedural data and follow-up data were collected. Results: A total of 155 patients from 22 centres of nine European countries were treated by concomitant pentaspline catheter PFA-based PVI and LAAC. The mean CHA2DS2-VA score was 3.1 ± 1.4. The primary efficacy endpoint was achieved at 97.4% with successful PVI at 100% and successful LAAC in 151/155 patients (97.4%). The primary safety endpoint was observed in 3/155 patients (1.9%). Transoesophageal echocardiography and/or CCTA 67 ± 26 days after the procedure showed no device embolization and no device-related thrombus, 24/151 (15.9%) patients showed peri-device gaps of 5 mm have been observed in 3/151 (2.0%). Among 137/155 patients with available arrhythmia, a follow-up >6 months at 78.1% showed sinus rhythm. Conclusion: In this large multicentre study, concomitant PFA-based AF ablation and LAA closure proved to be feasible, effective, and safe and overall procedure duration was short.

Aims: A dual-energy ablation system was developed to optimize targeted energy delivery via a flexible-tip, contact-force sensing catheter with electroanatomic mapping integration. This is the first report of long-term safety and effectiveness results of this system for ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Methods and results: The FOCALFLEX study is a prospective, multicentre study. Patients with PAF were enrolled between August 2024 and January 2025, with 144 patients (62.0 ± 10.0 years, 62.6% male) undergoing ablation with the TactiFlex PFA System at 21 sites worldwide. Primary safety and effectiveness endpoints were the rate of pre-defined serious adverse events within 7 days and the 6-month freedom from documented AF/AFL/AT episodes >30 s after a 90-day blanking period. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed in each case with pulsed field required for posterior left atrium (LA) ablation and radiofrequency (RF) for cavotricuspid isthmus or near coronary arteries. Non-PV targets and modality were at physician’s discretion. Acute effectiveness was confirmed via entrance block and post-ablation LA voltage map after a 20-min waiting period and was achieved in 99.6% (566/568) of treated PVs with 95.5 ± 37.1 pulsed field ablation (PFA) applications/patients. Procedure, fluoroscopy, LA dwell, and PV ablation times were 112.2 ± 29.5, 7.6 ± 5.7, 81.1 ± 19.7, and 47.4 ± 16.4 min, respectively. There were two (1.4%) primary safety events. At 6 months, 81.0% of subjects were free from documented arrhythmia recurrence and the protocol-defined primary effectiveness rate was 79.6%. There was one repeat ablation (0.7%) after the blanking period through 6 months. Conclusion: The FOCALFLEX study results demonstrate safety and effectiveness of a novel dual-mode RF/PFA system through 6 months of follow-up to treat symptomatic, recurrent PAF. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06271967

Aims: Clinical studies with protocol-mandated workflow and monitoring have analysed performance of pulsed field ablation (PFA) for treating atrial fibrillation (AF). The FARADISE registry captures global use of the pentaspline PFA catheter in real-world clinical practice with a follow-up of 3 years. Methods and results: FARADISE is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-national registry (NCT05501873) that enrolled subjects clinically indicated for ablation using the pentaspline PFA catheter per medical judgement and hospital standard-of-care. Procedural characteristics, safety, and clinical effectiveness up to 12-months were collected. In total, 1158 AF patients received PFA across 48 centres in 21 countries (64 ± 11 years, 33% female, 90% de novo, 65% paroxysmal AF). Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)-only procedures were performed in 80.8% of paroxysmal vs. 57.5% for non-paroxysmal patients (P < 0.01). Median procedure, left atrial dwell, and fluoroscopy times were 51[40–70], 31[24–41], and 12[8–17] min, respectively. The rate of early onset serious adverse events was 1.5% and did not differ by ablation strategy or AF indication. At 1-year, clinical effectiveness was 80.8% for paroxysmal AF and 67.7% for non-paroxysmal AF, with no difference within indication by lesion set (paroxysmal: 81.2% PVI-only vs. 79.0% PVI+, P = 0.65; non-paroxysmal: 67.5% PVI-only vs. 67.7% PVI+, P = 0.79). Acute results reinforce a short procedural learning curve with no difference in 1-year effectiveness by operator experience. Conclusion: The FARADISE registry provides a snapshot of real-world clinical use of the pentaspline PFA catheter. Acute results demonstrate favourable procedural and safety outcomes regardless of AF indication. One-year outcomes are encouraging, with no differences seen within indication based on ablation strategy.

The 4S-AF scheme [Stroke risk, Symptom severity, Severity of atrial fibrillation (AF) burden, Substrate severity] has recently been described as a novel approach to in-depth characterization of AF. We aim to determine if the 4S-AF scheme would be useful for AF characterization and provides prognostic information in real-world AF patients. The Spanish and French cohorts of the EORP-AF Long-Term General Registry were included. The baseline 4S-AF scheme was calculated and related to the primary management strategy (rhythm or rate control). Follow-up was performed at 1-year with all-cause mortality and the composite of ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack/systemic embolism, major bleeding, and all-cause death, as primary endpoints. A total of 1479 patients [36.9% females, median age 72 interquartile range (IQR 64–80) years] were included. The median 4S-AF scheme score was 5 (IQR 4–7). The 4S-AF scheme, as continuous and as categorical, was associated with the management strategy decided for the patient (both P < 0.001). The predictive performances of the 4S-AF scheme for the actual management strategy were appropriate in its continuous [c-index 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75–0.80] and categorical (c-index 0.75, 95% CI 0.72–0.78) forms. Cox regression analyses showed that ‘red category’ classified patients in the 4S-AF scheme had a higher risk of all-cause death (aHR 1.75, 95% CI 1.02–2.99) and composite outcomes (aHR 1.60, 95% CI 1.05–2.44). Characterization of AF by using the 4S-AF scheme may aid in identifying AF patients that would be managed by rhythm or rate control and could also help in identifying high-risk AF patients for worse clinical outcomes in a ‘real-world’ setting.

Introduction: Current guidelines recommend adequate anticoagulation for at least 3 weeks pre‐ and 4 weeks post‐direct current cardioversion (DCCV) to reduce thrombo‐embolic risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) lasting greater than 48 h. No specific recommendations exist for DCCV in patients that have undergone left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO), many of whom are ineligible for anticoagulation. This study aims to observe the efficacy and safety of DCCV post‐LAAO in everyday clinical practice.Methods: This prospective multicenter registry included DCCVs in patients post‐LAAO. Imaging strategy or anticoagulation treatment around DCCV were analyzed. Complications during 30‐day follow‐up were registered. DCCVs performed in accordance with current guidelines for the general AF population were compared to DCCVs performed deviating from these guidelines.Results: In 93 patients (age 65 ± 17 years, CHA₂DS₂‐VASC 3.0 ± 1.3) 284 DCCVs were performed between 2010 and 2018, in 271 sinus rhythm was restored. A wide variety of imaging or anticoagulation strategies around DCCV was observed; in 128 episodes strategies deviated from current guidelines. No thrombo‐embolic events were observed after any DCCV during 30‐day follow‐up. In 34 DCCVs trans‐esophageal echocardiography (TOE) was performed before DCCV to exclude cardiac thrombi and/or (re‐)verify adequate device positioning. In two patients without post‐LAAO imaging before DCCV, a device rotation or embolization was observed during scheduled TOE after LAAO.Conclusion: DCCV in AF patients after LAAO is highly effective. No thrombo‐embolic events were observed in any patient in this observational cohort, regardless of the periprocedural anticoagulation or imaging strategy. Confirmation of adequate device positioning at least once before DCCV seems recommendable.

Background: The Prevention With Mediterranean Diet (PREDIMED) trial supported the effectiveness of a nutritional intervention conducted by a dietitian to prevent cardiovascular disease. However, the effect of a remote intervention to follow the Mediterranean diet has been less explored. Objective: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a remotely provided Mediterranean diet–based nutritional intervention in obtaining favorable dietary changes in the context of a secondary prevention trial of atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: The PREvention of recurrent arrhythmias with Mediterranean diet (PREDIMAR) study is a 2-year multicenter, randomized, controlled, single-blinded trial to assess the effect of the Mediterranean diet enriched with extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) on the prevention of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation. Participants in sinus rhythm after ablation were randomly assigned to an intervention group (Mediterranean diet enriched with EVOO) or a control group (usual clinical care). The remote nutritional intervention included phone contacts (1 per 3 months) and web-based interventions with provision of dietary recommendations, and participants had access to a web page, a mobile app, and printed resources. The information is divided into 6 areas: Recommended foods, Menus, News and Online resources, Practical tips, Mediterranean diet classroom, and Your personal experience. At baseline and at 1-year and 2-year follow-up, the 14-item Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS) questionnaire and a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire were collected by a dietitian by phone. Results: A total of 720 subjects were randomized (365 to the intervention group, 355 to the control group). Up to September 2020, 560 subjects completed the first year (560/574, retention rate 95.6%) and 304 completed the second year (304/322, retention rate 94.4%) of the intervention. After 24 months of follow-up, increased adherence to the Mediterranean diet was observed in both groups, but the improvement was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (net between-group difference: 1.8 points in the MEDAS questionnaire (95% CI 1.4-2.2; P<.001). Compared with the control group, the Mediterranean diet intervention group showed a significant increase in the consumption of fruits (P<.001), olive oil (P<.001), whole grain cereals (P=.002), pulses (P<.001), nuts (P<.001), white fish (P<.001), fatty fish (P<.001), and white meat (P=.007), and a significant reduction in refined cereals (P<.001), red and processed meat (P<.001), and sweets (P<.001) at 2 years of intervention. In terms of nutrients, the intervention group significantly increased their intake of omega-3 (P<.001) and fiber (P<.001), and they decreased their intake of carbohydrates (P=.02) and saturated fatty acids (P<.001) compared with the control group. Conclusions: The remote nutritional intervention using a website and phone calls seems to be effective in increasing adherence to the Mediterranean diet pattern among AF patients treated with catheter ablation. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03053843; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03053843

BACKGROUND The Prevention With Mediterranean Diet (PREDIMED) trial supported the effectiveness of a nutritional intervention conducted by a dietitian to prevent cardiovascular disease. However, the effect of a remote intervention to follow the Mediterranean diet has been less explored. OBJECTIVE This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a remotely provided Mediterranean diet–based nutritional intervention in obtaining favorable dietary changes in the context of a secondary prevention trial of atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS The PREvention of recurrent arrhythmias with Mediterranean diet (PREDIMAR) study is a 2-year multicenter, randomized, controlled, single-blinded trial to assess the effect of the Mediterranean diet enriched with extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) on the prevention of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation. Participants in sinus rhythm after ablation were randomly assigned to an intervention group (Mediterranean diet enriched with EVOO) or a control group (usual clinical care). The remote nutritional intervention included phone contacts (1 per 3 months) and web-based interventions with provision of dietary recommendations, and participants had access to a web page, a mobile app, and printed resources. The information is divided into 6 areas: Recommended foods, Menus, News and Online resources, Practical tips, Mediterranean diet classroom, and Your personal experience. At baseline and at 1-year and 2-year follow-up, the 14-item Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS) questionnaire and a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire were collected by a dietitian by phone. RESULTS A total of 720 subjects were randomized (365 to the intervention group, 355 to the control group). Up to September 2020, 560 subjects completed the first year (560/574, retention rate 95.6%) and 304 completed the second year (304/322, retention rate 94.4%) of the intervention. After 24 months of follow-up, increased adherence to the Mediterranean diet was observed in both groups, but the improvement was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (net between-group difference: 1.8 points in the MEDAS questionnaire (95% CI 1.4-2.2; P<.001). Compared with the control group, the Mediterranean diet intervention group showed a significant increase in the consumption of fruits (P<.001), olive oil (P<.001), whole grain cereals (P=.002), pulses (P<.001), nuts (P<.001), white fish (P<.001), fatty fish (P<.001), and white meat (P=.007), and a significant reduction in refined cereals (P<.001), red and processed meat (P<.001), and sweets (P<.001) at 2 years of intervention. In terms of nutrients, the intervention group significantly increased their intake of omega-3 (P<.001) and fiber (P<.001), and they decreased their intake of carbohydrates (P=.02) and saturated fatty acids (P<.001) compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS The remote nutritional intervention using a website and phone calls seems to be effective in increasing adherence to the Mediterranean diet pattern among AF patients treated with catheter ablation. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03053843; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03053843