Johannes Kahl
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Johannes Kahl has a total of 12 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Cristina Quintas-Soriano
Social-Ecological Research Laboratory, Biology and Geology Department, Andalusian Center for Global Change - Hermelindo Castro (ENGLOBA), University of Almeria, La Cañada de San Urbano, Almería, Spain
1 shared publication - Jana Hajslova
Department of Food Analysis and Nutrition, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague (UCT Prague), Prague 8, Czech Republic
1 shared publication - Maria Olga Kokornaczyk
Society for Cancer Research, 4144 Arlesheim, Switzerland
1 shared publication - Marija Bodroža-Solarov
Institute of Food Technology, University of Novi Sad, Bul. cara Lazara 1, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
1 shared publication - Mario Torralba
Environmental Geography Group, IVM Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
1 shared publication - María García-Martín
Land Change Science Research Unit, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 8 December 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in Landscape Ecology
- Vol. 36 (8) , 2259-2275
Linking food systems and landscape sustainability in the Mediterranean region
Context: Global dynamics affect the sustainability of agricultural landscapes, but these cross-scale connections are understudied. Therefore, we combine food systems and landscape ecology, focusing on food products that provide a linkage between global consumers and landscapes of production (e.g., Douro Valley wine) which we call landscape products. Objective: The aim of this study is to characterise Mediterranean landscape products based on experts’ perceptions by analysing their qualities, farming practices, and value chains, and to identify their ecological, cultural, and socio-economic outcomes in the landscapes of production. Methods: Experts with specific knowledge on a landscape product were surveyed by email and their answers analysed using descriptive and ordination statistics. Fifty-four landscape products were characterised. Results: Based on the experts’ perceptions, landscape products are high quality products, mainly using traditional knowledge and low intensity farming. They support biocultural diversity in the landscapes of production, but their positive socio-economic outcomes remain limited, with problems of inequity and lack of empowerment among producers and a tendency towards intensification or abandonment of the farming practices. We distinguished three types of products based on their localness and how their qualities were shared with consumers. Local products performed better in the ecological and cultural outcomes and products under certification in the economic. Labelling mechanisms and better organisation of producers could enhance these products and their positive outcomes. Conclusions: Combining landscape ecology and food systems research allowed us better understand the outcomes of landscape products in the landscapes of production and suggest pathways for fostering landscape sustainability.
- 8 December 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in Landscape Ecology
- Vol. 36 (8) , 2259-2275
Open AccessLinking food systems and landscape sustainability in the Mediterranean region
Context: Global dynamics affect the sustainability of agricultural landscapes, but these cross-scale connections are understudied. Therefore, we combine food systems and landscape ecology, focusing on food products that provide a linkage between global consumers and landscapes of production (e.g., Douro Valley wine) which we call landscape products. Objective: The aim of this study is to characterise Mediterranean landscape products based on experts’ perceptions by analysing their qualities, farming practices, and value chains, and to identify their ecological, cultural, and socio-economic outcomes in the landscapes of production. Methods: Experts with specific knowledge on a landscape product were surveyed by email and their answers analysed using descriptive and ordination statistics. Fifty-four landscape products were characterised. Results: Based on the experts’ perceptions, landscape products are high quality products, mainly using traditional knowledge and low intensity farming. They support biocultural diversity in the landscapes of production, but their positive socio-economic outcomes remain limited, with problems of inequity and lack of empowerment among producers and a tendency towards intensification or abandonment of the farming practices. We distinguished three types of products based on their localness and how their qualities were shared with consumers. Local products performed better in the ecological and cultural outcomes and products under certification in the economic. Labelling mechanisms and better organisation of producers could enhance these products and their positive outcomes. Conclusions: Combining landscape ecology and food systems research allowed us better understand the outcomes of landscape products in the landscapes of production and suggest pathways for fostering landscape sustainability.
- 13 February 2014
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
- Vol. 94 (13) , 2595-2599
Status quo and future research challenges on organic food quality determination with focus on laboratory methods
Organic food quality determination needs multi‐dimensional evaluation tools. The main focus is on the authentication as an analytical verification of the certification process. New fingerprinting approaches such as ultra‐performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, direct analysis in real time–high‐resolution mass spectrometry as well as crystallization with and without the presence of additives seem to be promising methods in terms of time of analysis and detecting organic system‐related parameters. For further methodological development, a system approach is recommended, which also takes into account food structure aspects. Furthermore, the authentication of processed organic samples needs more consciousness, hence most of organic food is complex and processed. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry
- 13 February 2014
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
- Vol. 94 (13) , 2595-2599
Status quo and future research challenges on organic food quality determination with focus on laboratory methods
Organic food quality determination needs multi‐dimensional evaluation tools. The main focus is on the authentication as an analytical verification of the certification process. New fingerprinting approaches such as ultra‐performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, direct analysis in real time–high‐resolution mass spectrometry as well as crystallization with and without the presence of additives seem to be promising methods in terms of time of analysis and detecting organic system‐related parameters. For further methodological development, a system approach is recommended, which also takes into account food structure aspects. Furthermore, the authentication of processed organic samples needs more consciousness, hence most of organic food is complex and processed. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry