Cecilia Ferrari

Background: Surgical strategies for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) have progressively evolved toward parenchyma-sparing approaches, increasing the relevance of understanding the relationship between tumor biology and resection margin patterns. In parallel, KRAS and BRAF mutations have emerged as key determinants of tumor behavior in CRLM. The interaction between mutational status and surgical margin type, however, remains insufficiently characterized. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included patients undergoing curative-intent liver resection for CRLM between 2016 and 2021 across 17 international HPB centers. Clinicopathological variables were compared according to mutational status and margin type. Results: Among 1078 eligible patients, KRAS-mutated patients more frequently presented synchronous metastases, nodal involvement, and administration of perioperative chemotherapy compared with wild-type patients. Higher tumor burden was associated with both R1 parenchymal (R1P) and R1 vascular (R1V) resections. Within KRAS-mutated patients, synchronous disease and bilobar involvement were more frequently associated with R1P resections. Conclusions: KRAS/BRAF mutational status is associated with distinct clinicopathological patterns in patients undergoing liver resection for CRLM. Higher tumor burden and biologically aggressive disease features are more frequently associated with R1P and R1V resections, particularly among KRAS-mutated tumors.

Background and Objectives: Various publications have compared outcomes among open (OPDs), laparoscopic (LPDs), and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomies (RPDs); however, the number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remains limited. This study aims to conduct a systematic review and analyze the outcomes between these approaches from randomized controlled trials. Materials and Methods: We performed a systematic literature search across PubMed/MedLine, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar to identify relevant RCTs. The systematic review was conducted using the reporting items for systematic reviews and network meta-analyses guidelines (PRISMA-NMA) and registered in Prospero (CRD420251024475). For statistical analysis R software (version 4.3.2) was used. Results: Eight RCTs involving 1416 patients (706 OPDs, 600 LPDs, 110 RPDs) were included. LPD had a significantly longer operative time than OPD, while RPD showed no significant difference compared to OPD. Blood loss was reduced in both minimally invasive approaches. LPD showed a higher R0 resection rate and lower pancreatic fistula rate, whereas RPD had the lowest mortality. No significant differences were observed in major complications, reoperation, or readmission. LPD shortened hospital stay; RPD showed no difference. Conclusions: Although open pancreaticoduodenectomy remains a well-established standard, both laparoscopic and robotic approaches offer safe alternatives with distinct advantages. LPD is associated with shorter hospital stay and lower pancreatic fistula rates, whereas RPD demonstrates the lowest mortality. The lack of direct randomized comparisons between LPD and RPD highlights the need for further head-to-head trials.

Background Due to delayed diagnosis and a lower surgical indication rate, left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is often associated with a poor prognosis in comparison to pancreatic head tumors. Multi-visceral resections (MVR) associated with distal pancreatectomy could be proposed for patients presenting with locally infiltrating disease. Methods We retrospectively analyzed a multi-centric cohort of left-sided PDAC patients operated on from 2009 to 2020. Thirteen European high-volume HPB centers participated in this study. We analyzed patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy (DP) associated with MVR and compared them to standard DP patients. Results Among 258 patients treated curatively for PDAC of the body and tail, 28 patients successfully underwent MVR. A longer operative time was observed in the MVR group (295 min +/− 74 vs. 250 min +/− 96, p= 0.248). The post-operative complication rate was comparable between the two groups (46.4% in the MVR group vs. 62.2% in the control group, p= 0.108). The incidence of positive margin (R1) was similar between the two groups (28.6% vs. 26.6%; p=0.827). After a median follow-up of 25 (9–111) months, overall survival was comparable between the two groups (p= 0.519). Conclusions Multi-visceral resection in left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is safe and feasible and should be considered in selected cases as it seems to provide acceptable surgical and oncological outcomes.

Background/Aim: Rectal cancer (RC) represents 30% of colon cancers. Despite the progress achieved in integrated chemoradiotherapy and surgical multidisciplinary treatments, the rate of local recurrence (LR) is 3.7-13%. Multivisceral resections allow many patients with pelvic recurrence to be treated in a curative manner. The purpose of this work is to assess the impact of surgery for rectal cancer patients with pelvic recurrence. Patients and Methods: In a retrospective study from 2013 to 2018, data was collected from patients who had undergone rectal resection for adenocarcinoma. We compared perioperative data, postoperative outcomes, oncological results, and survival rates. Results: 106 rectal cancer patients (40-87 years old) requiring surgery were included. The local recurrence rate was 15% (15 patients). LR patients requiring intervention were nine (56%) who underwent sphincter sparing surgeries, and 6 (44%) who underwent surgeries with sphincter resection. There was no statistically significant difference (p=0.416) in the 5-year overall survival rate of patients without recurrence compared to those with pelvic recurrence. Conclusion: Curative surgery for local recurrence from rectal cancer is safe and feasible and should be considered in selected cases as it seems to provide acceptable surgical and oncological outcomes.

Background: Biliary tree cysts (BTCs) represent an either localized or multifocal abnormal dilatation of the biliary tree, which entails an increased risk of acute cholangitis and cholangiocarcinoma (2.5%–16%). Its incidence in Western countries is ∼1/100.000–1/150.000, being more frequent in Asia (1/1.000). These cysts are usually classified according to Todani classification, which is based on site and morphology of cysts. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective multicentric descriptive study of patients surgically treated for BTCs. From 2005 to 2018, 25 cases were collected between Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau (Barcelona, Spain) and Ospedale San Paolo (Savona, Italy). Clinical presentation was characterized by abdominal pain, jaundice, fever, and sometimes weight loss. Eight patients presented Todani type I, 1 patient Todani type II, 3 patients Todani III, 1 patient Todani type IV, and 12 patients Todani type V. Results: Among the 25 surgically treated patients, 12 patients underwent liver resection, 7 patients underwent resection of the extrahepatic biliary tree, 3 patients underwent BTC removal through a duodenotomy, 1 patient underwent resection of the extrahepatic biliary tree and liver resection, and 2 patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy. Overall 30-day morbidity rate was 20%, and 90-day mortality was 0%. Pathologic examination confirmed diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in 5 patients (20%). After a median follow-up of 59 months, 20 patients are alive and in good conditions, whereas 50% of patients with cholangiocarcinoma died for disease progression. Conclusions: Surgical treatment for BTCs is associated with acceptable postoperative outcomes, with moderate morbidity and null mortality rates. Moreover, the risk of developing cholangiocarcinoma is still high that prompts surgical treatment once diagnosis is made.