Kayla R. Getz
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Kayla R. Getz has a total of 25 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Adetunji T. Toriola
Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
20 shared publications - Babatunde Adedokun
Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
19 shared publications - Shuai Xu
Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA
19 shared publications - Alison M. Mondul
University of Michigan 28 Ann Arbor, MI
2 shared publications Emily Bellile
Department of Biostatistics University of Michigan School of Public Health Ann Arbor Michigan USA
2 shared publicationsGregory T. Wolf
Department of Otolaryngology University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 24 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplemental Figure 1 from Breastfeeding and Mammographic Breast Density: A Cross-sectional Study
Supplemental Figure 1: Flowchart displaying how we arrived at the final analytic sample. Among the women recruited to the study, 127 were missing breastfeeding duration and 32 were missing values for all of the MBD measures. An additional 18 participants were missing values for one of the confounding variables; 11 women were missing age at menarche, 1 woman was missing BMI and 6 women were missing information about family history of breast cancer.
- 24 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplemental Figure 1 from Breastfeeding and Mammographic Breast Density: A Cross-sectional Study
Supplemental Figure 1: Flowchart displaying how we arrived at the final analytic sample. Among the women recruited to the study, 127 were missing breastfeeding duration and 32 were missing values for all of the MBD measures. An additional 18 participants were missing values for one of the confounding variables; 11 women were missing age at menarche, 1 woman was missing BMI and 6 women were missing information about family history of breast cancer.
- Open Access
- 24 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplemental Table 1 from Breastfeeding and Mammographic Breast Density: A Cross-sectional Study
Supplemental Table 1 shows results from IPW analysis.
- 24 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplemental Table 1 from Breastfeeding and Mammographic Breast Density: A Cross-sectional Study
Supplemental Table 1 shows results from IPW analysis.
- Open Access
- 16 September 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplemental Figure 1 from Breastfeeding and Mammographic Breast Density: A Cross-sectional Study
Supplemental Figure 1: Flowchart displaying how we arrived at the final analytic sample. Among the women recruited to the study, 127 were missing breastfeeding duration and 32 were missing values for all of the MBD measures. An additional 18 participants were missing values for one of the confounding variables; 11 women were missing age at menarche, 1 woman was missing BMI and 6 women were missing information about family history of breast cancer.
- 16 September 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplemental Figure 1 from Breastfeeding and Mammographic Breast Density: A Cross-sectional Study
Supplemental Figure 1: Flowchart displaying how we arrived at the final analytic sample. Among the women recruited to the study, 127 were missing breastfeeding duration and 32 were missing values for all of the MBD measures. An additional 18 participants were missing values for one of the confounding variables; 11 women were missing age at menarche, 1 woman was missing BMI and 6 women were missing information about family history of breast cancer.
- Open Access
- 16 September 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Data from Breastfeeding and Mammographic Breast Density: A Cross-sectional Study
Breastfeeding is inversely associated with breast cancer risk but the associations of breastfeeding with mammographic breast density (MBD) are not clear. We investigated the association between breastfeeding and volumetric measures of MBD (volumetric percent density (VPD), dense volume (DV) and non-dense volume (NDV)) and evaluated whether it differs by race, menopausal status, and body mass index (BMI). The study population was comprised of 964 women (67% non-Hispanic white, 29% non-Hispanic black) who had screening mammography at Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. VPD, DV and NDV were log10 transformed. We performed multivariable linear regression models adjusted for age, BMI, family history of breast cancer, race, and age at menarche among all participants and exclusively in parous women. Mean age was 50.7 years. VPD was 12% lower among women who breastfed 0-6 months, (10^β=0.88, 95%CI (0.79,0.98)) compared to nulliparous women. Breastfeeding was inversely associated with DV (parous never breastfed: 10^β=0.93, 95%CI (0.83,1.04), breastfed 0-6 months: 10^β=0.91, 95%CI (0.79,1.05), breastfed 7-12 months: 10^β=0.94, 95%CI (0.81,1.10), breastfed >12 months: 10^β=0.87, 95%CI (0.78,0.98), p-trend=0.03). BMI modified the association between breastfeeding and VPD. Women who breastfed for 0-6 months and had a BMI < 25kg/m2 had lower VPD compared to nulliparous women, but among women with a BMI ≥ 25kg/m2 there was no association (p-interaction=0.04). In this diverse study population, the association of breastfeeding with VPD appears to be modified by BMI, but not by race or menopausal status. Future research exploring the associations of breastfeeding with other mammographic features are needed.
- 16 September 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessData from Breastfeeding and Mammographic Breast Density: A Cross-sectional Study
Breastfeeding is inversely associated with breast cancer risk but the associations of breastfeeding with mammographic breast density (MBD) are not clear. We investigated the association between breastfeeding and volumetric measures of MBD (volumetric percent density (VPD), dense volume (DV) and non-dense volume (NDV)) and evaluated whether it differs by race, menopausal status, and body mass index (BMI). The study population was comprised of 964 women (67% non-Hispanic white, 29% non-Hispanic black) who had screening mammography at Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. VPD, DV and NDV were log10 transformed. We performed multivariable linear regression models adjusted for age, BMI, family history of breast cancer, race, and age at menarche among all participants and exclusively in parous women. Mean age was 50.7 years. VPD was 12% lower among women who breastfed 0-6 months, (10^β=0.88, 95%CI (0.79,0.98)) compared to nulliparous women. Breastfeeding was inversely associated with DV (parous never breastfed: 10^β=0.93, 95%CI (0.83,1.04), breastfed 0-6 months: 10^β=0.91, 95%CI (0.79,1.05), breastfed 7-12 months: 10^β=0.94, 95%CI (0.81,1.10), breastfed >12 months: 10^β=0.87, 95%CI (0.78,0.98), p-trend=0.03). BMI modified the association between breastfeeding and VPD. Women who breastfed for 0-6 months and had a BMI < 25kg/m2 had lower VPD compared to nulliparous women, but among women with a BMI ≥ 25kg/m2 there was no association (p-interaction=0.04). In this diverse study population, the association of breastfeeding with VPD appears to be modified by BMI, but not by race or menopausal status. Future research exploring the associations of breastfeeding with other mammographic features are needed.
- Open Access
- 16 September 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplemental Figure 1 from Breastfeeding and Mammographic Breast Density: A Cross-sectional Study
Supplemental Figure 1: Flowchart displaying how we arrived at the final analytic sample. Among the women recruited to the study, 127 were missing breastfeeding duration and 32 were missing values for all of the MBD measures. An additional 18 participants were missing values for one of the confounding variables; 11 women were missing age at menarche, 1 woman was missing BMI and 6 women were missing information about family history of breast cancer.
- 16 September 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplemental Figure 1 from Breastfeeding and Mammographic Breast Density: A Cross-sectional Study
Supplemental Figure 1: Flowchart displaying how we arrived at the final analytic sample. Among the women recruited to the study, 127 were missing breastfeeding duration and 32 were missing values for all of the MBD measures. An additional 18 participants were missing values for one of the confounding variables; 11 women were missing age at menarche, 1 woman was missing BMI and 6 women were missing information about family history of breast cancer.
- Open Access
- 16 September 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplemental Table 1 from Breastfeeding and Mammographic Breast Density: A Cross-sectional Study
Supplemental Table 1 shows results from IPW analysis.
- 16 September 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplemental Table 1 from Breastfeeding and Mammographic Breast Density: A Cross-sectional Study
Supplemental Table 1 shows results from IPW analysis.
- Open Access
- 16 September 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplemental Table 1 from Breastfeeding and Mammographic Breast Density: A Cross-sectional Study
Supplemental Table 1 shows results from IPW analysis.
- 16 September 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplemental Table 1 from Breastfeeding and Mammographic Breast Density: A Cross-sectional Study
Supplemental Table 1 shows results from IPW analysis.
- 3 May 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Vol. 33 (8) , 1126-1128
Aspirin Metabolites and Mammographic Breast Density in Premenopausal Women
Background: Studies investigating the associations of self-reported aspirin use and mammographic breast density (MBD) have reported conflicting results. Therefore, we investigated the associations of aspirin metabolites with MBD in premenopausal women. Methods: We performed this study on 705 premenopausal women who had a fasting blood draw for metabolomic profiling. We performed covariate-adjusted linear regression models to calculate the least square means of volumetric measures of MBD [volumetric percent density (VPD), dense volume (DV), and nondense volume (NDV)] by quartiles of aspirin metabolites [salicyluric glucuronide, 2-hydroxyhippurate (salicylurate), salicylate, and 2,6-dihydroxybenzoic acid]. Results: Approximately 13% of participants reported taking aspirin in the past 12 months. Aspirin users had higher levels of 2-hydroxyhippurate (salicylurate), salicylate, and salicyluric glucuronide (peak area) than nonusers, but only the mean peak area of salicyluric glucuronide was increased by both dose (1–2 tablets per day = 1,140,663.7 and ≥3 tablets per day = 1,380,476.0) and frequency (days per week: 1 day = 888,129.3, 2–3 days = 1,199,897.9, and ≥4 days = 1,654,637.0). Aspirin metabolites were not monotonically associated with VPD, DV, or NDV. Conclusions: Given the null results, additional research investigating the associations of aspirin metabolites in breast tissue and MBD is necessary. Impact: Elucidating the determinants of MBD, a strong risk factor for breast cancer, can play an important role in breast cancer prevention. Future studies should determine the associations of nonaspirin NSAID metabolites with MBD.
- 3 May 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Vol. 33 (8) , 1126-1128
Aspirin Metabolites and Mammographic Breast Density in Premenopausal Women
Background: Studies investigating the associations of self-reported aspirin use and mammographic breast density (MBD) have reported conflicting results. Therefore, we investigated the associations of aspirin metabolites with MBD in premenopausal women. Methods: We performed this study on 705 premenopausal women who had a fasting blood draw for metabolomic profiling. We performed covariate-adjusted linear regression models to calculate the least square means of volumetric measures of MBD [volumetric percent density (VPD), dense volume (DV), and nondense volume (NDV)] by quartiles of aspirin metabolites [salicyluric glucuronide, 2-hydroxyhippurate (salicylurate), salicylate, and 2,6-dihydroxybenzoic acid]. Results: Approximately 13% of participants reported taking aspirin in the past 12 months. Aspirin users had higher levels of 2-hydroxyhippurate (salicylurate), salicylate, and salicyluric glucuronide (peak area) than nonusers, but only the mean peak area of salicyluric glucuronide was increased by both dose (1–2 tablets per day = 1,140,663.7 and ≥3 tablets per day = 1,380,476.0) and frequency (days per week: 1 day = 888,129.3, 2–3 days = 1,199,897.9, and ≥4 days = 1,654,637.0). Aspirin metabolites were not monotonically associated with VPD, DV, or NDV. Conclusions: Given the null results, additional research investigating the associations of aspirin metabolites in breast tissue and MBD is necessary. Impact: Elucidating the determinants of MBD, a strong risk factor for breast cancer, can play an important role in breast cancer prevention. Future studies should determine the associations of nonaspirin NSAID metabolites with MBD.
- Open Access
- 1 June 2023
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Data from Breastfeeding and Mammographic Breast Density: A Cross-sectional Study
Breastfeeding is inversely associated with breast cancer risk but the associations of breastfeeding with mammographic breast density (MBD) are not clear. We investigated the association between breastfeeding and volumetric measures of MBD [volumetric percent density (VPD), dense volume (DV), and non-dense volume (NDV)] and evaluated whether it differs by race, menopausal status, and body mass index (BMI). The study population was comprised of 964 women (67% non-Hispanic White, 29% non-Hispanic Black) who had screening mammography at Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. VPD, DV and NDV were log10 transformed. We performed multivariable linear regression models adjusted for age, BMI, family history of breast cancer, race, and age at menarche among all participants and exclusively in parous women. Mean age was 50.7 years. VPD was 12% lower among women who breastfed 0–6 months, [10β = 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI; 0.79–0.98)] compared with nulliparous women. Breastfeeding was not associated with VPD among women who breastfed >7 months. Breastfeeding was inversely associated with DV [parous never breastfed: 10β = 0.93; 95% CI (0.83–1.04), breastfed 0–6 months: 10β = 0.91, 95% CI (0.79–1.05), breastfed 7–12 months: 10β = 0.94; 95% CI (0.81–1.10), breastfed >12 months: 10β = 0.87, 95% CI (0.78–0.98), Ptrend = 0.03]. BMI modified the association between breastfeeding and VPD. Women who breastfed for 0–6 months and had a BMI < 25 kg/m2 had lower VPD compared with nulliparous women, but among women with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 there was no association (Pinteraction = 0.04). In this diverse study population, the association of breastfeeding with VPD appears to be modified by BMI, but not by race or menopausal status. Future research exploring the associations of breastfeeding with other mammographic features are needed.Prevention Relevance:Breastfeeding for up to 6 months may be associated with lower VPD among women with a BMI < 25 kg/m2. The potential role of MBD in mediating the associations of breastfeeding with breast cancer risk in a select group of women deserves further evaluation.See related Spotlight, p. 309
- 1 June 2023
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessData from Breastfeeding and Mammographic Breast Density: A Cross-sectional Study
Breastfeeding is inversely associated with breast cancer risk but the associations of breastfeeding with mammographic breast density (MBD) are not clear. We investigated the association between breastfeeding and volumetric measures of MBD [volumetric percent density (VPD), dense volume (DV), and non-dense volume (NDV)] and evaluated whether it differs by race, menopausal status, and body mass index (BMI). The study population was comprised of 964 women (67% non-Hispanic White, 29% non-Hispanic Black) who had screening mammography at Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. VPD, DV and NDV were log10 transformed. We performed multivariable linear regression models adjusted for age, BMI, family history of breast cancer, race, and age at menarche among all participants and exclusively in parous women. Mean age was 50.7 years. VPD was 12% lower among women who breastfed 0–6 months, [10β = 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI; 0.79–0.98)] compared with nulliparous women. Breastfeeding was not associated with VPD among women who breastfed >7 months. Breastfeeding was inversely associated with DV [parous never breastfed: 10β = 0.93; 95% CI (0.83–1.04), breastfed 0–6 months: 10β = 0.91, 95% CI (0.79–1.05), breastfed 7–12 months: 10β = 0.94; 95% CI (0.81–1.10), breastfed >12 months: 10β = 0.87, 95% CI (0.78–0.98), Ptrend = 0.03]. BMI modified the association between breastfeeding and VPD. Women who breastfed for 0–6 months and had a BMI < 25 kg/m2 had lower VPD compared with nulliparous women, but among women with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 there was no association (Pinteraction = 0.04). In this diverse study population, the association of breastfeeding with VPD appears to be modified by BMI, but not by race or menopausal status. Future research exploring the associations of breastfeeding with other mammographic features are needed.Prevention Relevance:Breastfeeding for up to 6 months may be associated with lower VPD among women with a BMI < 25 kg/m2. The potential role of MBD in mediating the associations of breastfeeding with breast cancer risk in a select group of women deserves further evaluation.See related Spotlight, p. 309
- Open Access
- 1 June 2023
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplemental Table 1 from Breastfeeding and Mammographic Breast Density: A Cross-sectional Study
Supplemental Table 1 shows results from IPW analysis.
- 1 June 2023
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplemental Table 1 from Breastfeeding and Mammographic Breast Density: A Cross-sectional Study
Supplemental Table 1 shows results from IPW analysis.