Adam Viera

This study explored the perspectives of adults in substance use recovery about obtaining and strategically building recovery capital on social media. In this qualitative interview study, we used a combined inductive and deductive content analysis approach to derive themes informed by the Recovery Capital Model. Participants (N = 49) in virtual interviews were recruited via substance use treatment centers in the northeast and southeast US. Most identified as female (59.2%) and White (57.1%), with an average age of 39.09 years (SD = 10.06). Most (77.6%) reported receiving treatment for alcohol use, and almost half had received treatment for cannabis (49.0%). We used semi-structured interviews focused on the perspectives of adults in recovery about their motivations and the positive and negative impacts of their social media use. Participants' descriptions of recovery capital built on social media were organized in four thematic categories based on the type of capital: Human Recovery Capital (e.g., Online information/content), Physical Recovery Capital (e.g., Instrumental support), Social Recovery Capital (e.g., Emotional support), and Cultural/Community Recovery Capital (e.g., Online peer recovery communities). We also coded instances of Negative Recovery Capital (e.g., Negative/deceptive content) across domains and characterized a variety of Strategies to Gain Recovery Capital (e.g., Disclosing their recovery journey at specific times online). Social media can provide access to recovery capital, especially human and social capital, with little effort expenditure, and online contexts may allow more strategic disclosure of concealable stigmatized identities, such as being in recovery. However, adults must also navigate online content and connections perceived as harmful to their recovery journey.

Background: The use of tracking technology in substance use research can uncover the role of contextual factors, such as social networks and environmental cues, in triggering cravings and precipitating return to use. Few studies have explored the opinions of individuals in substance use treatment related to tracking technology. Methods: We conducted 30 semi-structured interviews with individuals in substance use treatment facilities in Connecticut and Georgia. Interviews were not limited to individuals with any specific substance use disorder. Interviewers described a hypothetical study involving ecological momentary assessment and global positioning system tracking to examine place-based predictors of substance use. Participants were invited to share reactions to this description. We used thematic analysis to identify themes in participant perceptions of this hypothetical research study. Results: Most participants shared positive opinions about study participation and expressed little to no concern about the tracking components. Participant concerns focused on the security of their information and the potential burden of responding to study questions. Participants largely understood the importance of study participation for promoting greater understanding of substance use and identified potential therapeutic effects of study participation on their own recovery. Conclusions: Individuals in substance use treatment expressed little concern with research studies or interventions incorporating mobile-tracking elements. Future studies should explore the responsible use of tracking elements in recovery support interventions.

Background: We investigated the interaction between arrests for technical violations vs. receiving new charges with receiving community-based methadone treatment on time-to reincarceration (TTR) in a cohort of men with opioid use disorder (OUD) released from custody from two Connecticut jails from 2014 to 2018. Methods: Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated for time to reincarceration for technical violations/infractions, misdemeanors only, felonies only, and both misdemeanors and felonies after adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, and receiving methadone treatment during incarceration or in the community following release. Moderation analyses tested the hypotheses that the benefits of receiving methadone in jail or the community on TTR were significantly different for people with only technical violations and infractions compared to misdemeanor and felony charges. Results: In the sample of 788 men who were reincarcerated, 29.4% received technical violations with no new charges (n = 232) with the remainder of the sample receiving new charges consisting of 26.9% new misdemeanor charges, 6.5% felony charges, and 37.2% both felony and misdemeanor charges. Compared to men who received new misdemeanor charges, TTR was significantly shorter among those who received technical violations and infractions with no new charges amounting to a 50% increase in TTR (334.5 days, SD = 321.3 vs. 228.1 days, SD = 308.0, p < 0.001; aHR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.3, 1.8, p < 0.001). TTR of men who resumed methadone and were charged with a new crime was 50% longer than those who resumed methadone and received technical violations/infractions with no new charges. (230.2 days, SD = 340.2 vs. 402.3 days, SD = 231.3; aHR = 1.5, 95%CI = 1.0, 2.2, p = 0.038). Conclusions: Reducing technical violations may enhance the benefits of providing community-based methadone following release from incarceration on extending the time between incarcerations during the vulnerable time post-incarceration and reduce the burden on correctional systems.

Substance use disorders (SUD) are widely prevalent throughout the United States, with 20.4 million Americans meeting the criteria for a past-year SUD in 2019. Of these, only 10% accessed some form ...

The HIV epidemic disproportionately impacts men who have sex with men (MSM), particularly those who use stimulants. We explored barriers and facilitators to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake among this population. From June 2018 through February 2019, we conducted semi-structured interviews in Providence, Rhode Island, and New Haven, Connecticut, with 21 MSM who reported recent (past six months) stimulant use. We identified individual, interpersonal, and structural barriers to PrEP, including: (1) high awareness but mixed knowledge of PrEP, resulting in concerns about side effects and drug interactions; (2) interest that was partly determined by substance use and perceived HIV risk; (3) fragmented and constrained social networks not conducive to disseminating PrEP information; and (4) PrEP access, such as insurance coverage and cost. Our findings suggest potential approaches to increase PrEP uptake in this group, including promotion through mainstream and social media, clarifying misinformation, and facilitating increased access through structural interventions.

Stimulant use is increasing in the United States (U.S.), especially among men who have sex with men (MSM). Objectives: We sought to ascertain barriers and facilitators to substance use treatment ut...

Background: In this opioid overdose epidemic, women are an overlooked group seeing increasing rates of overdose death. Implementation challenges have prevented evidence-based interventions from effectively reaching women who misuse opioids, with gaps in access to effective treatment and services. Family planning clinics could serve as important points of contact for referral to needed treatments and services. The study explores how family planning staff knowledge and attitudes related to opioid misuse serve as potential barriers and challenges in making referrals for evidence-based services and treatments. Methods: In 2018, we conducted a national online survey of family planning staff, assessing knowledge and attitudes of treatments and services for opioid misuse. Results: A total of 691 family planning staff completed the survey. Most respondents agreed that opioid misuse was a major problem in their community (86.0%) and identified challenges in responding to it, including a lack of treatment access (70.3%), the absence of in-house behavioral health staff (67.2%), and unfamiliarity with local treatment providers (54.1%). Respondents reported low levels of acceptability for syringe services programs (46.0%), medications such as methadone and buprenorphine (55.4%), and naloxone to reverse opioid overdose (60.1%). Controlling for other factors, race/ethnicity, urbanicity, workplace role, and substance use training were associated with differences in acceptability. Conclusions: Family planning settings could play a critical role in connecting women who misuse opioids to treatment and services. Strategies are needed to increase the acceptability of evidence-based interventions and the feasibility of having family planning staff play a linkage role.