Bao Zhang

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common medical disorder that begins during pregnancy. The present work aimed to investigate the relationship of maternal or foetal circulatory zinc levels with GDM. Related studies were retrieved against the PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Scopus databases till July 2020. The overall effects were expressed as standard mean difference (SMD). Furthermore, the random effects model was used to assess the summarised risk ratios (SRRs) to determine the relationship between zinc and the risk of GDM. A total of 15 articles involving were retrieved for meta‐analysis; in the meantime, 4955 subjects including 1549 GDM cases were enrolled for quantitative analysis. Compared with normal control, GDM cases had decreased circulating zinc level on the whole, but the difference was not statistically significant (SMD = −0.40, 95%CI: −0.80 to −0.00, P = 0.05). Interestingly, upon subgroup analysis stratified by serum zinc content but not plasma zinc concentration, there was significant difference in zinc content between GDM cases and normal controls (SMD = −0.56; 95%CI: −1.07 to −0.04, P = 0.03). Meanwhile, subgroup analysis also revealed similar tendency among the Asians and during the 2nd trimester, but not among the Caucasians or during the 1st or 3rd trimester. Data extracted from four studies that compared pregnant women with GDM in the high level of zinc and GDM in the low level of zinc yielded an SRR of 0.929 (95%CI: 0.905–0.954). According to existing evidence, the serum zinc content decreases among GDM cases compared with subjects with no abnormality in glucose tolerance, in particular among the Asians and during the second trimester. Nonetheless, more well designed prospective study should be carried out for understanding the dynamic relationship of zinc level with the incidence of GDM.

Introduction: Endovascular therapy is the standard of care for severe acute ischemic stroke caused by large‐vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation, but there is a debate on the optimal anesthetic approach during this therapy. Meta‐analyses of observational studies suggest that general anesthesia increases disability and death compared with conscious sedation However, their results are conflicting. This meta‐analysis study was performed to assess the relationship between the effects of general anesthesia compared to conscious sedation during endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke.Methods: Through a systematic literature search up to August 2020, 18 studies included 4,802 subjects at baseline with endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke and reported a total of 1,711 subjects using general anesthesia and 1,961 subjects using conscious sedation were found. They recorded relationships between the effects of general anesthesia compared to conscious sedation during endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Odds ratio (OR) or Mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated between the effect of general anesthesia compared to conscious sedation during endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke using the dichotomous or contentious methods with a random or fixed‐effect model.Results: No significant difference were found between general anesthesia and conscious sedation during the endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke in functional independence at 90 days (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.44–1.40, p = 40); successful recanalization at 24 hr (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.62–2.41, p = 55); mortality at 90 days (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.83–2.24, p = .22); interventional complication (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.76–2.02, p = .40); symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.41–0.99, p = .05); aspiration pneumonia (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.58–1.58, p = .87); and National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score after 24 hr (MD, 0.38; 95% CI, −1.15–1.91, p = .62); with relative relationship favoring general anesthesia only in decreasing the symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.Conclusions: General anesthesia has no independent relationship compared to conscious sedation during the endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with a relative relationship favoring general anesthesia only in decreasing the symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.This relationship encouraged us to recommend either anesthetic strategy during the endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with no possible fear of higher complication.

Background and Purpose Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) represents the frequently occurring medical disorder beginning in the process of pregnancy. No consensus has been reached about the relationship of circulating copper content with the risk of GDM. Therefore, the present work carried out a meta-analysis for summarizing epidemiological research regarding the copper level with the GDM risk. Furthermore, studies using categories of copper concentration as exposure were combined by dose-response meta-analysis. Methods Related studies were retrieved against the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from inception till August 2020. The overall effects were expressed as standard mean difference (SMD). A dose-response meta-analysis was conducted to assess whether the higher copper concentration was associated with higher risks of GDM. Stata 16.0 and Review Manager 5.3 were utilized for data analysis. Results A total of fourteen articles involving were retrieved for meta-analysis; in the meantime, 2670 pregnant subjects including 910 GDM cases were enrolled for quantitative analysis. Based on the integrated findings, GDM cases showed increased circulating copper contents relative to those in normal pregnant subjects (SMD = 0.65, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.11; P = 0.005). There was no obvious evidence of publication bias among the studies enrolled. Subgroup analysis showed that such trend was consistent in the third trimester (SMD = 1.21, 95% CI 0.35 to 2.08; P = 0.006) but not second trimester. Meanwhile, circulating copper concentration was significantly higher in women with GDM than those without GDM within the Asian population but not within the Caucasian population (Asia: SMD = 0.73; 95% CI 0.12 to 1.34, P = 0.02; Europe: SMD = 0.49; 95% CI: − 0.23 to 1.20, P = 0.18). Further, serum copper analysis together with subgroup analysis was conducted, and the same result was obtained. For dose-response analysis, the linear associations between circulating copper and risks of GDM were revealed, that higher circulating copper concentration during pregnancy is closely associated with GDM. Conclusion According to existing evidence, the serum copper concentration increased among GDM cases compared with subjects with normality in glucose tolerance pregnant subject, in particular among the Asians and during the third trimester. The finding from dose-response analysis suggested that increased copper level is associated with an increased risk of GDM. Nonetheless, more specially designed prospective articles should be carried out for understanding the dynamic relationship of copper concentration with the GDM risk. Graphical abstract