Viktoria Graskemper
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Viktoria Graskemper has a total of 3 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Jan-Henning Feil
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
2 shared publications Xiaohua Yu
1 shared publication- Xiaohua Yu
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development Georg‐August‐Universität Göttingen Göttingen Germany
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 21 February 2022
- Published by University Goettingen Repository
Entrepreneurship in Agriculture – Farmer Typology, Determinants and Values
- 21 February 2022
- Published by University Goettingen Repository
Open AccessEntrepreneurship in Agriculture – Farmer Typology, Determinants and Values
- 1 January 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Rural Studies
- Vol. 89, 13-24
Values of farmers – Evidence from Germany
- 1 January 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Rural Studies
- Vol. 89, 13-24
Values of farmers – Evidence from Germany
- Open Access
- 19 January 2021
- Published by Wiley in Agribusiness
- Vol. 37 (3) , 569-589
Analyzing strategic entrepreneurial choices in agriculture—Empirical evidence from Germany
Entrepreneurship in agriculture is a phenomenon that is growing in importance with the changing framework conditions for agricultural production and has led to heterogeneity in farm business development paths. To understand this phenomenon better, a classification scheme for strategic entrepreneurial choices in agriculture is developed for family farmers. The choices that are scrutinized are reduction, continuation, expansion, diversification, and the dual strategy of expansion and diversification. Each farmer is uniquely assigned to one of these choice classes according to their implemented entrepreneurial activities. Determinants influencing these choices are investigated with a multinomial logit model. The data are derived from a quantitative survey among German farmers (N = 745). Strong effects are observable within the area of personal factors; creativity and risk affinity benefit entrepreneurial strategies connected with diversification. Farmers with a third‐level education qualification are less likely to follow expansion strategies, and those with off‐farm employment and risk‐averse farmers mainly choose a reduction strategy. Family involvement, especially the farmer's spouse, proves to have stabilizing and even enhancing effects on certain strategies. Implications for policymakers and actors within the agricultural sector can thus be derived.
- 19 January 2021
- Published by Wiley in Agribusiness
- Vol. 37 (3) , 569-589
Open AccessAnalyzing strategic entrepreneurial choices in agriculture—Empirical evidence from Germany
Entrepreneurship in agriculture is a phenomenon that is growing in importance with the changing framework conditions for agricultural production and has led to heterogeneity in farm business development paths. To understand this phenomenon better, a classification scheme for strategic entrepreneurial choices in agriculture is developed for family farmers. The choices that are scrutinized are reduction, continuation, expansion, diversification, and the dual strategy of expansion and diversification. Each farmer is uniquely assigned to one of these choice classes according to their implemented entrepreneurial activities. Determinants influencing these choices are investigated with a multinomial logit model. The data are derived from a quantitative survey among German farmers (N = 745). Strong effects are observable within the area of personal factors; creativity and risk affinity benefit entrepreneurial strategies connected with diversification. Farmers with a third‐level education qualification are less likely to follow expansion strategies, and those with off‐farm employment and risk‐averse farmers mainly choose a reduction strategy. Family involvement, especially the farmer's spouse, proves to have stabilizing and even enhancing effects on certain strategies. Implications for policymakers and actors within the agricultural sector can thus be derived.