Robert Huber
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Robert Huber has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Adnan Kanbar
Molecular Cell Biology, Botanical Institute, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
1 shared publication - Christof Wöll
Institute of Functional Interfaces (IFG) Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) Eggenstein‐Leopoldshafen Germany
1 shared publication - Lars Heinke
Freie Universität Berlin
1 shared publication - Mohammed Sarheed
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Botanical Institute, Molecular Cell Biology, Fritz-Haber-Weg, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
1 shared publication - Peter Nick
Joseph Gottlieb Kölreuter Institute Für Plant Sciences, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
1 shared publication - Salih Okur
Institute of Functional Interfaces (IFG), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Hermann-Von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, 76344 Karlsruhe, Germany
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 4 February 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in Chemosensors
- Vol. 9 (2) , 31
Identification of Mint Scents Using a QCM Based E-Nose
Mints emit diverse scents that exert specific biological functions and are relevance for applications. The current work strives to develop electronic noses that can electronically discriminate the scents emitted by different species of Mint as alternative to conventional profiling by gas chromatography. Here, 12 different sensing materials including 4 different metal oxide nanoparticle dispersions (AZO, ZnO, SnO2, ITO), one Metal Organic Frame as Cu(BPDC), and 7 different polymer films, including PVA, PEDOT:PSS, PFO, SB, SW, SG, and PB were used for functionalizing of Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM) sensors. The purpose was to discriminate six economically relevant Mint species (Mentha x piperita, Mentha spicata, Mentha spicata ssp. crispa, Mentha longifolia, Agastache rugosa, and Nepeta cataria). The adsorption and desorption datasets obtained from each modified QCM sensor were processed by three different classification models, including Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), and k-Nearest Neighbor Analysis (k-NN). This allowed discriminating the different Mints with classification accuracies of 97.2% (PCA), 100% (LDA), and 99.9% (k-NN), respectively. Prediction accuracies with a repeating test measurement reached up to 90.6% for LDA, and 85.6% for k-NN. These data demonstrate that this electronic nose can discriminate different Mint scents in a reliable and efficient manner.
- 4 February 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in Chemosensors
- Vol. 9 (2) , 31
Open AccessIdentification of Mint Scents Using a QCM Based E-Nose
Mints emit diverse scents that exert specific biological functions and are relevance for applications. The current work strives to develop electronic noses that can electronically discriminate the scents emitted by different species of Mint as alternative to conventional profiling by gas chromatography. Here, 12 different sensing materials including 4 different metal oxide nanoparticle dispersions (AZO, ZnO, SnO2, ITO), one Metal Organic Frame as Cu(BPDC), and 7 different polymer films, including PVA, PEDOT:PSS, PFO, SB, SW, SG, and PB were used for functionalizing of Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM) sensors. The purpose was to discriminate six economically relevant Mint species (Mentha x piperita, Mentha spicata, Mentha spicata ssp. crispa, Mentha longifolia, Agastache rugosa, and Nepeta cataria). The adsorption and desorption datasets obtained from each modified QCM sensor were processed by three different classification models, including Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), and k-Nearest Neighbor Analysis (k-NN). This allowed discriminating the different Mints with classification accuracies of 97.2% (PCA), 100% (LDA), and 99.9% (k-NN), respectively. Prediction accuracies with a repeating test measurement reached up to 90.6% for LDA, and 85.6% for k-NN. These data demonstrate that this electronic nose can discriminate different Mint scents in a reliable and efficient manner.