Jingjing Liu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Jingjing Liu has a total of 34 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Jean-François Hocquette
INRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, VetAgroSup
7 shared publications Isabelle Legrand
Institut de l'Elevage, 87060 Cedex 2 Limoges, France
4 shared publicationsMarie-Pierre Ellies-Oury
INRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, VetAgro Sup, UMR 1213, Recherches sur les Herbivores, Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France; Bordeaux Sciences Agro, F-33175 Gradignan, France
4 shared publicationsGrzegorz Pogorzelski
INRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, VetAgro Sup, UMR1213, Recherches sur les Herbivores, Clermont-Ferrand, France
3 shared publications- Marie-Pierre Ellies-Oury
Bordeaux Sciences Agro, 1 Cours du Général de Gaulle, 33175 Gradignan, France; Clermont Université, INRAE, VetAgroSup, UMR1213, 63122 Saint-Genès Champanelle, France
3 shared publications Sghaier Chriki
Isara, AgroSchool for Life, 23 rue Jean Baldassini, 69364 Lyon, France
3 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 7 April 2026
- Published by Agence Bibliographique de l'Enseignement Supérieur
What is the best future for beef? Better eating quality? Cultured “meat”?
Quelle est la voie d’avenir pour la viande bovine ? une qualité en bouche supérieure ? ou produire de la "viande" cultivée ?: Indisponible.
- 7 April 2026
- Published by Agence Bibliographique de l'Enseignement Supérieur
What is the best future for beef? Better eating quality? Cultured “meat”?
Quelle est la voie d’avenir pour la viande bovine ? une qualité en bouche supérieure ? ou produire de la "viande" cultivée ?: Indisponible.
- 16 May 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Food Chemistry
- Vol. 454, 139645
Discrimination of beef composition and sensory quality by using rapid Evaporative Ionisation Mass Spectrometry (REIMS)
- 16 May 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Food Chemistry
- Vol. 454, 139645
Discrimination of beef composition and sensory quality by using rapid Evaporative Ionisation Mass Spectrometry (REIMS)
- Open Access
Carcass Characteristics and Beef Quality of Young Grass-Fed Angus x Salers Bovines
To characterize carcass and meat attributes, such as beef eating quality in specific farming conditions, 31 young grass-fed crossbred Angus x Salers cattle in two farming systems (a mono-cattle system versus a mixed system with beef cattle and sheep) were used in this study. Three muscle cuts (striploin—m. longissimus dorsi et thoracis; bolar blade—m. triceps brachii caput longum; internal flank plate—m. obliquus internus abdominis) were used for consumer eating quality testing and striploin was used for panelist eating quality assessment, and objective measurements [Warner–Bratzler shear force (WBSF) and fatty acid (FA) and antioxidant contents]. Results indicated that the farming system had no impact on carcass characteristics or meat quality, but it tended to affect FA content, which is likely explained by between-system differences in animal maturity (assessed by ossification score). Animal gender had significant effects on three eating quality traits evaluated by untrained consumers, with higher flavor liking, overall liking, and overall meat eating quality (MQ4) scores in females than in males. Additionally, FA contents were correlated with sensory quality traits to varying extents: consumer-scored tenderness, flavor, and overall liking were mainly positively correlated with ω-3 and ω-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) contents, and panelist-evaluated tenderness and abnormal flavor were more positively correlated with total lipids, saturated fatty acid (SFA), and monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) contents. Overall, this study showed that specific grass-fed crossbred Angus x Salers cattle can produce lean meat rich in ω-3 PUFAs with a low ω-6/ω-3 ratio and with “better than average” beef eating quality.
Open AccessCarcass Characteristics and Beef Quality of Young Grass-Fed Angus x Salers Bovines
To characterize carcass and meat attributes, such as beef eating quality in specific farming conditions, 31 young grass-fed crossbred Angus x Salers cattle in two farming systems (a mono-cattle system versus a mixed system with beef cattle and sheep) were used in this study. Three muscle cuts (striploin—m. longissimus dorsi et thoracis; bolar blade—m. triceps brachii caput longum; internal flank plate—m. obliquus internus abdominis) were used for consumer eating quality testing and striploin was used for panelist eating quality assessment, and objective measurements [Warner–Bratzler shear force (WBSF) and fatty acid (FA) and antioxidant contents]. Results indicated that the farming system had no impact on carcass characteristics or meat quality, but it tended to affect FA content, which is likely explained by between-system differences in animal maturity (assessed by ossification score). Animal gender had significant effects on three eating quality traits evaluated by untrained consumers, with higher flavor liking, overall liking, and overall meat eating quality (MQ4) scores in females than in males. Additionally, FA contents were correlated with sensory quality traits to varying extents: consumer-scored tenderness, flavor, and overall liking were mainly positively correlated with ω-3 and ω-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) contents, and panelist-evaluated tenderness and abnormal flavor were more positively correlated with total lipids, saturated fatty acid (SFA), and monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) contents. Overall, this study showed that specific grass-fed crossbred Angus x Salers cattle can produce lean meat rich in ω-3 PUFAs with a low ω-6/ω-3 ratio and with “better than average” beef eating quality.
- 21 February 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Meat Science
- Vol. 188, 108776
Does the future of meat in France depend on cultured muscle cells? Answers from different consumer segments
- 21 February 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Meat Science
- Vol. 188, 108776
Does the future of meat in France depend on cultured muscle cells? Answers from different consumer segments
- Open Access
- 29 March 2021
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Veterinary Science
- Vol. 8
Are Marbling and the Prediction of Beef Eating Quality Affected by Different Grading Sites?
For the European abattoirs, the preferred carcass grading site is at the fifth rib, and cutting at the tenth rib as in Australia could lead to a lower economic value of the carcass. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the grading scores of marbling and the meat and fat color on Musculus longissimus thoracis et lumborum (LTL) at the fifth and the tenth thoracic vertebrae. The consequences on the prediction of beef eating quality using the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) grading scheme were also evaluated for cull cows, which produce the majority of beef consumed in France. Carcasses from 208 French cattle, mainly Limousine cows, were graded according to the Australian Beef Carcase Chiller Assessment System (ABCAS) used for the implementation of the MSA system. The results indicate that there was no significant difference in the marbling score, between the fifth and the tenth ribs and hence in the MSA index and in the Global Quality [meat quality (MQ4)] scores calculated from marbling values from either the fifth rib or the tenth rib. However, the meat color at the tenth rib was significantly darker than that at the fifth rib (p < 0.01), and the fat color at the tenth rib was significantly yellower than that at the fifth rib (p < 0.001). The results of this study suggest that the grading of marbling can be conducted on M. LTL at the fifth thoracic vertebrae for routine use of the MSA system in France and, more generally, in Europe. However, further investigation and adjustment would be needed for other critical MSA scores (such as rib fat thickness) while respecting the European carcass quartering practices.
- 29 March 2021
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Veterinary Science
- Vol. 8
Open AccessAre Marbling and the Prediction of Beef Eating Quality Affected by Different Grading Sites?
For the European abattoirs, the preferred carcass grading site is at the fifth rib, and cutting at the tenth rib as in Australia could lead to a lower economic value of the carcass. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the grading scores of marbling and the meat and fat color on Musculus longissimus thoracis et lumborum (LTL) at the fifth and the tenth thoracic vertebrae. The consequences on the prediction of beef eating quality using the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) grading scheme were also evaluated for cull cows, which produce the majority of beef consumed in France. Carcasses from 208 French cattle, mainly Limousine cows, were graded according to the Australian Beef Carcase Chiller Assessment System (ABCAS) used for the implementation of the MSA system. The results indicate that there was no significant difference in the marbling score, between the fifth and the tenth ribs and hence in the MSA index and in the Global Quality [meat quality (MQ4)] scores calculated from marbling values from either the fifth rib or the tenth rib. However, the meat color at the tenth rib was significantly darker than that at the fifth rib (p < 0.01), and the fat color at the tenth rib was significantly yellower than that at the fifth rib (p < 0.001). The results of this study suggest that the grading of marbling can be conducted on M. LTL at the fifth thoracic vertebrae for routine use of the MSA system in France and, more generally, in Europe. However, further investigation and adjustment would be needed for other critical MSA scores (such as rib fat thickness) while respecting the European carcass quartering practices.
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
Chinese Consumers’ Attitudes and Potential Acceptance toward Artificial Meat
The interest for artificial meat has recently expanded. However, from the literature, perception of artificial meat in China is not well known. A survey was thus carried out to investigate Chinese attitudes toward artificial meat. The answers of 4666 respondents concluded that 19.9% and 9.6% of them were definitely willing and unwilling to try artificial meat respectively, whereas 47.2% were not willing to eat it regularly, and 87.2% were willing to pay less for it compared to conventional meat. Finally, 52.9% of them will accept artificial meat as an alternative to conventional meat. Emotional resistance such as the perception of “absurdity or disgusting” would lead to no willingness to eat artificial meat regularly. The main concerns were related to safety and unnaturalness, but less to ethical and environmental issues as in Western countries. Nearly half of the respondents would like artificial meat to be safe, tasty, and nutritional. Whereas these expectations have low effects on willingness to try, they may induce consumers’ rejection to eat artificial meat regularly, underlying the weak relationship between wishes to try and to eat regularly. Thus, potential acceptance of artificial meat in China depends on Chinese catering culture, perception of food and traditional philosophy.
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessChinese Consumers’ Attitudes and Potential Acceptance toward Artificial Meat
The interest for artificial meat has recently expanded. However, from the literature, perception of artificial meat in China is not well known. A survey was thus carried out to investigate Chinese attitudes toward artificial meat. The answers of 4666 respondents concluded that 19.9% and 9.6% of them were definitely willing and unwilling to try artificial meat respectively, whereas 47.2% were not willing to eat it regularly, and 87.2% were willing to pay less for it compared to conventional meat. Finally, 52.9% of them will accept artificial meat as an alternative to conventional meat. Emotional resistance such as the perception of “absurdity or disgusting” would lead to no willingness to eat artificial meat regularly. The main concerns were related to safety and unnaturalness, but less to ethical and environmental issues as in Western countries. Nearly half of the respondents would like artificial meat to be safe, tasty, and nutritional. Whereas these expectations have low effects on willingness to try, they may induce consumers’ rejection to eat artificial meat regularly, underlying the weak relationship between wishes to try and to eat regularly. Thus, potential acceptance of artificial meat in China depends on Chinese catering culture, perception of food and traditional philosophy.
- 1 December 2020
- Published by Elsevier in Meat Science
- Vol. 170, 108233
European conformation and fat scores of bovine carcasses are not good indicators of marbling
- 1 December 2020
- Published by Elsevier in Meat Science
- Vol. 170, 108233
European conformation and fat scores of bovine carcasses are not good indicators of marbling
- 1 October 2020
- Published by Elsevier in Meat Science
- Vol. 168, 108190
Contributions of tenderness, juiciness and flavor liking to overall liking of beef in Europe
- 1 October 2020
- Published by Elsevier in Meat Science
- Vol. 168, 108190
Contributions of tenderness, juiciness and flavor liking to overall liking of beef in Europe