Nir Levi

Background/Objectives: Existing data regarding the kinetics of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) are limited. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the kinetics of highly sensitive (hs) cTnI following acute myocardial infarction (MI) in a large-scale, real-world cohort. Methods: A prospective observational cohort study included all consecutive patients admitted to the intensive cardiovascular care unit (ICCU) with ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between January 2020 and April 2024. Hs-cTnI concentrations were measured at the time of presentation and daily thereafter. Results: A total of 1174 STEMI patients [191 females (16.3%)] with a mean age of 63 years and 767 NSTEMI patients [137 females (17.9%)] with a mean age of 66.7 years were enrolled. The average hs-cTnI peak levels were 77,937.99 ng/L and 24,804.73 ng/L for STEMI and NSTEMI patients, respectively. A single peak of hs-cTnI was observed in 83% and 78% of STEMI and NSTEMI patients, respectively, while two peaks were observed in 11% and 19% and three or more peaks were observed in 6% and 3% of STEMI and NSTEMI patients, respectively. A higher number of peaks was associated with a lower ejection fraction and more in-hospital complications. Additionally, a higher number of peaks correlated with a higher in-hospital mortality rate among NSTEMI patients. Conclusions: Most STEMI and NSTEMI patients displayed a monophasic kinetic pattern of hs-cTnI peak levels. However, a greater number of hs-cTnI peaks was linked to a higher incidence of clinical complications, lower ejection fraction, and increased mortality.

Background: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) is useful for detecting acute myocardial infarction, but chronic hemodialysis patients often have elevated baseline levels that exceed the upper reference limit (URL). This study aimed to determine whether hs-cTnI levels in asymptomatic hemodialysis patients exceed the URL established for the general population, evaluate the impact of high-flux hemodialysis on hs-cTnI concentrations, and examine associations between hs-cTnI levels and subsequent hospitalization or mortality. Methods: A prospective, single-center cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care center from August 2023 to July 2024. Blood samples for hs-cTnI were collected from asymptomatic hemodialysis patients aged ≥ 40 years, measured before and after dialysis within one month. Patients were followed for up to 12 months. Results: Fifty-six patients were enrolled. The mean hs-cTnI levels were 28.4 ng/L pre-dialysis and 27.9 ng/L post-dialysis, with ranges of <6–223 ng/L and <6–187 ng/L, respectively. The mean hs-cTnI delta between pre- and post-dialysis was −0.5 ng/L, with 52% showing a negative delta, 30% no change, and 18% a positive delta. No association was found between baseline hs-cTnI levels and mortality or hospitalization during follow-up. Conclusions: Most asymptomatic hemodialysis patients had hs-cTnI levels in the “gray zone”, thus neither confirming nor excluding acute myocardial infarction. Dialysis did not significantly affect hs-cTnI levels, and elevated baseline hs-cTnI was not linked to increased mortality or hospitalization over 12 months.

Background: Takotsubo syndrome (TS) mimics acute coronary syndrome in 1% to 3% of patients presenting with chest pain, ECG changes and echocardiographic transient apical wall hypokinesia. Objectives: This study aimed to validate a previously developed scoring system on a larger cohort size. Methods: Patients admitted to an intensive cardiovascular care unit were divided into three groups: (a) patients diagnosed with TS, (b) females with anterior MI, and (c) other all-comer STEMIs. A 10-point scoring system was used: stressful events (three points), female gender (two points), no history of diabetes mellitus (two points), estimated left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40% on admission echocardiography (one point), positive troponin on admission (one point), and no smoking (one point). A t-test was applied to the three study groups, sensitivity and specificity testing was performed using the ROC curve method. Results: A total of 1150 patients were included in our study: 54 with TS, 97 females with anterior MI and 999 other all-comer STEMIs. Patients in the TS group were predominantly females with a higher rate of stressful events prior to admission, lower rates of diabetes mellitus and smoking, and lower LVEF% systolic function compared to the STEMI cohort. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, the average TS scoring system was significantly higher in the TS group compared with the anterior STEMI and all-comer STEMI groups (8.3 vs. 5.7 vs. 3.83, p < 0.001, respectively) with an AUC of 0.83 for TS score ≥ 8. Conclusions: The 10-point TS scoring system is an easy, reliable, and useful diagnostic tool that might help in distinguishing patients with TS and ACS.

Introduction: Cardiac troponin I is routinely measured in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. However, when a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) test is ordered without a clear clinical indication, unexpectedly elevated levels can lead to unnecessary diagnostic workups and inappropriate management. This study aimed to investigate physicians’ rationale for performing hs-cTnI tests in an emergency department (ED). Methods: In this prospective study, 1890 patients who underwent hs-cTnI measurement during their stay in an ED were included. Upon arrival, patients were classified into two groups based on their chief complaints: cardiac (36.6%) and non-cardiac (63.4%). Forty-seven ED physicians were asked to complete a questionnaire to assess their perspectives on the use of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) testing in the ED. Results: Out of the 47 ED physicians who responded to the questionnaire (94% response rate), 97.9% indicated that the purpose of hs-cTnI testing in the ED was to diagnose an acute cardiac event. However, 38.3% reported ordering hs-cTnI tests in non-cardiac patients due to medicolegal concerns. Additionally, 53% admitted to working under medicolegal pressure, and 50% believe they would have ordered fewer hs-cTnI tests if not for this medicolegal threat. Conclusions: defensive medicine is prevalent among ED physicians, and routine use of hs-cTnI testing as part of an evaluation can be explained in part by concern about liability and defensive medicine.

Background: Primary ventricular fibrillation (VF) and sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) are potentially lethal complications in patients suffering from acute myocardial infarction (MI). In contrast with the profound data regarding the incidence and prognostic value of ventricular arrhythmias in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, data regarding contemporary non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients with ventricular arrhythmias is scarce. The aim of the current study was to investigate the incidence of VF/VT complicating NSTEMI among patients admitted to an intensive coronary care unit (ICCU). Methods: Prospective, single-center study of patients diagnosed with NSTEMI admitted to ICCU between June 2019 and December 2022. Data including demographics, presenting symptoms, comorbid conditions, and physical examination, as well as laboratory and imaging data, were analyzed. Patients were continuously monitored for arrhythmias during their admission. The study endpoint was the development of VF/sustained VT during admission. Results: A total of 732 patients were admitted to ICCU with a diagnosis of NSTEMI. Of them, six (0.8%) patients developed VF/VT during their admission. Nevertheless, three were excluded after they were misdiagnosed with NSTEMI instead of posterior ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Hence, only three (0.4%) NSTEMI patients had VF/VT during admission. None of the patients died during 1-year follow-up. Conclusions: VF/VT in NSTEMI patients treated according to contemporary guidelines including early invasive strategy is rare, suggesting these patients may not need routine monitoring and ICCU setup.

(1) Background: The impact of armed conflicts on public health is undeniable, with psychological stress emerging as a significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Nevertheless, contemporary data regarding the influence of war on CVD, and especially on acute coronary syndrome (ACS), are scarce. Hence, the aim of the current study was to assess the repercussions of war on the admission and prognosis of patients admitted to a tertiary care center intensive cardiovascular care unit (ICCU). (2) Methods: All patients admitted to the ICCU during the first three months of the Israel–Hamas war (2023) were included and compared with all patients admitted during the same period in 2022. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. (3) Results: A total of 556 patients (184 females [33.1%]) with a median age of 70 (IQR 59–80) were included. Of them, 295 (53%) were admitted to the ICCU during the first three months of the war. Fewer Arab patients and more patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infraction (STEMI) were admitted during the war period (21.8% vs. 13.2%, p < 0.001, and 31.9% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.04, respectively), whereas non-STEMI (NSTEMI) patients were admitted more frequently in the pre-war year (19.3% vs. 25.7%, p = 0.09). In-hospital mortality was similar in both groups (4.4% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.71; HR 1.42; 95% CI 0.6–3.32, p = 0.4). (4) Conclusions: During the first three months of the war, fewer Arab patients and more STEMI patients were admitted to the ICCU. Nevertheless, in-hospital mortality was similar in both groups.

Conduction abnormalities post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are common. Post-TAVI PR prolongation was mainly studied as an adjunct to new-onset bundle branch block. The net effect of isolated PR prolongation (IPRP) without post-TAVI QRS changes is not well known. The aim of this study was to define the incidence and clinical significance of post-TAVI IPRP. A total of 1108 consecutive TAVI patients were reviewed. Patients with IPRP were compared with patients without post-TAVI electrocardiogram (ECG) changes. Clinical outcomes included permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) and overall mortality. A total of 146 patients with IPRP were compared with 290 patients without post-TAVI ECG changes. At 1 year follow-up, 4 (2.7%) and 7 (2.4%) patients underwent PPI (P = 0.838) and 10 (6.8%) and 25 (8.6%) died (P = 0.521), from the study and control groups, respectively. No patient with IPRP and narrow QRS underwent PPI during 1 year post-TAVI, and all death events were non-cardiac except one unknown cause. Permanent pacemaker implantation rates among patients with IPRP and wide QRS were higher (n = 4, 12.1%), compared with patients with wide QRS without post-TAVI ECG change (n = 3, 4%) however not reaching statistical significance (P = 0.126). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated that in patients with narrow QRS, neither PR prolongation nor baseline or maximal PR intervals was associated with the combined endpoint of PPI and mortality. However, in patients with wide QRS, baseline PR intervals and QRS width, but not PR prolongation were associated with the combined outcome. Post-TAVI IPRP in patients with narrow QRS is not associated with adverse outcome. This finding may translate clinically into a more permissive approach to these patients.

We sought to prospectively investigate the accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment using a hand-held ultrasound device (HUD) in COVID-19 patients and to examine whether reduced LVEF predicts the composite endpoint of in-hospital death, advanced ventilatory support, shock, myocardial injury, and acute decompensated heart failure. COVID-19 patients were evaluated with a real-time LVEF assessment using an HUD equipped with an AI-based tool vs. assessment by a blinded fellowship-trained echocardiographer. Among 42 patients, those with LVEF < 50% were older with more comorbidities and unfavorable exam characteristics. An excellent correlation was demonstrated between the AI and the echocardiographer LVEF assessment (0.774, p < 0.001). Substantial agreement was demonstrated between the two assessments (kappa = 0.797, p < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the HUD for this threshold were 72.7% 100%, 100%, and 91.2%, respectively. AI-based LVEF < 50% was associated with worse composite endpoints; unadjusted OR = 11.11 (95% CI 2.25–54.94), p = 0.003; adjusted OR = 6.40 (95% CI 1.07–38.09, p = 0.041). An AI-based algorithm incorporated into an HUD can be utilized reliably as a decision support tool for automatic real-time LVEF assessment among COVID-19 patients and may identify patients at risk for unfavorable outcomes. Future larger cohorts should verify the association with outcomes.