CSCristian Sabau
Cristian Sabau
*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Cristian Sabau has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Gabriel Sas
4 shared publicationsBjörn Täljsten
3 shared publicationsCosmin Popescu
3 shared publicationsThomas Blanksvärd
3 shared publications- Cosmin Popescu
Structural and Fire Engineering, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, 97187 Luleå, Sweden
1 shared publication - Jacob Wittrup Schmidt
University of Aalborg
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 May 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Engineering Structures
- Vol. 187, 57-72
Local and global behavior of walls with cut-out openings in multi-story reinforced concrete buildings
- 1 May 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Engineering Structures
- Vol. 187, 57-72
Local and global behavior of walls with cut-out openings in multi-story reinforced concrete buildings
- 1 February 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Engineering Structures
- Vol. 181, 670-698
Experimental study on shear deformation of reinforced concrete beams using digital image correlation
- 1 February 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Engineering Structures
- Vol. 181, 670-698
Experimental study on shear deformation of reinforced concrete beams using digital image correlation
- 1 December 2018
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in Journal of Composites for Construction
- Vol. 22 (6)
Axially Loaded RC Walls with Cutout Openings Strengthened with FRCM Composites
Upgrading existing buildings to new functional requirements may require new openings that can weaken the structure, prompting the need for strengthening. In such cases traditional strengthening solutions, such as creating a reinforced concrete (RC) or steel frame around the opening, imply long-term restrictions in the use of the structure compared to solutions that use externally bonded composites. Two fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) composites were used in this study to restore the capacity of panels with newly created door type openings to that of a solid panel. Five half-scale RC panels acting as two-way action compression members were tested to failure. Two full-field optical deformation measurement systems were used to monitor and analyze the global structural response of each tested panel (i.e., crack pattern, failure mechanism, and displacement/strain fields). The performance of existing design methods for RC panels has been assessed in comparison with the experimental results. The capacity of strengthened panels with small openings ( ) was entirely restored to that of the solid panel. However, for panels with large openings ( ), only 75% of the solid panel’s capacity was restored. The capacity of the strengthened panels was about 175 and 150% higher compared to that of reference panels with small and large openings, respectively.- 1 December 2018
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in Journal of Composites for Construction
- Vol. 22 (6)
Axially Loaded RC Walls with Cutout Openings Strengthened with FRCM Composites
Upgrading existing buildings to new functional requirements may require new openings that can weaken the structure, prompting the need for strengthening. In such cases traditional strengthening solutions, such as creating a reinforced concrete (RC) or steel frame around the opening, imply long-term restrictions in the use of the structure compared to solutions that use externally bonded composites. Two fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) composites were used in this study to restore the capacity of panels with newly created door type openings to that of a solid panel. Five half-scale RC panels acting as two-way action compression members were tested to failure. Two full-field optical deformation measurement systems were used to monitor and analyze the global structural response of each tested panel (i.e., crack pattern, failure mechanism, and displacement/strain fields). The performance of existing design methods for RC panels has been assessed in comparison with the experimental results. The capacity of strengthened panels with small openings ( ) was entirely restored to that of the solid panel. However, for panels with large openings ( ), only 75% of the solid panel’s capacity was restored. The capacity of the strengthened panels was about 175 and 150% higher compared to that of reference panels with small and large openings, respectively.- 1 September 2018
- Published by Elsevier in Composites Part B: Engineering
- Vol. 149, 82-91
Strengthening of RC beams using bottom and side NSM reinforcement
- 1 September 2018
- Published by Elsevier in Composites Part B: Engineering
- Vol. 149, 82-91
Strengthening of RC beams using bottom and side NSM reinforcement