Ismael A. Vergara
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Ismael A. Vergara has a total of 492 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Richard Scolyer
Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
93 shared publications - Georgina V. Long
Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney
91 shared publications - James S. Wilmott
Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
89 shared publications - Serigne N. Lo
Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
80 shared publications - Jordan W. Conway
Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
59 shared publications - Nicholas K. Hayward
Cancer Research Program, QIMR Berghofer, Brisbane, Australia
54 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S1 from Clinical Features Associated with Outcomes and Biomarker Analysis of Dabrafenib plus Trametinib Treatment in Patients with BRAF-Mutant Melanoma Brain Metastases
Gene expression of major signalling pathways and multiplex immunohistochemical comparison of markers between timepoints and tumor sites. A) Gene expression of related oncogenic signalling pathways between treatment timepoints and site, B) Estimated mean difference of proteins and pathways between biopsy categories (95% confidence interval for the estimated mean difference is depicted as a segment), C) Multiplex immunohistochemical staining for key intracellular signalling proteins, D) Changes in immune intratumoral immune cell densities between treatment timepoints and site, E and F) Multiplex immunohistochemical staining depicted marked decrease in immune cell densities EDT in PT4 (steroid treated). PRE, collected prior to treatment; EDT, collected early during treatment (i.e., after 10-14 days of dabrafenib). MBM, melanoma brain metastasis; ECM, extracranial metastasis. PT, patient.
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S1 from Clinical Features Associated with Outcomes and Biomarker Analysis of Dabrafenib plus Trametinib Treatment in Patients with BRAF-Mutant Melanoma Brain Metastases
Gene expression of major signalling pathways and multiplex immunohistochemical comparison of markers between timepoints and tumor sites. A) Gene expression of related oncogenic signalling pathways between treatment timepoints and site, B) Estimated mean difference of proteins and pathways between biopsy categories (95% confidence interval for the estimated mean difference is depicted as a segment), C) Multiplex immunohistochemical staining for key intracellular signalling proteins, D) Changes in immune intratumoral immune cell densities between treatment timepoints and site, E and F) Multiplex immunohistochemical staining depicted marked decrease in immune cell densities EDT in PT4 (steroid treated). PRE, collected prior to treatment; EDT, collected early during treatment (i.e., after 10-14 days of dabrafenib). MBM, melanoma brain metastasis; ECM, extracranial metastasis. PT, patient.
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S2 from Intratumoral CD16+ Macrophages Are Associated with Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Metastatic Melanoma Treated with Combination Anti-PD-1 and Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy
C1Q and PD-1 expression on CD16+ macrophages in on treatment biopsies of melanoma patients treated with PD-1 or PD-1+CTLA-4 ICB. Dynamics between pretreatment and early-during treatment biopsies on (a) CD16+ macrophages as a proportion of all macrophages (b) CD16+ C1q+ macrophages as a proportion of all C1q+ macrophages (c) PD-1+ CD16+ macrophages as a proportion of PD-1+ macrophages (d) PD-1+ CD16+ C1q+ macrophages as a proportion of all macrophages (e) C1q+ CD16+ macrophages as a proportion of CD16+ macrophages (f) PD-1+ CD16+ macrophages as a proportion of CD16+ macrophages. (g) Log2 RNA expression of C1qa-c in pretreatment (PRE) and early during treatment (EDT) biopsies of responding and non-responding patients treated with PD-1 or PD-1+CTLA-4 ICB. (h) Flow cytometry analysis of ipilimumab (IgG1) and/or secondary anti-IgG1 binding to CD16+ and CD16- macrophages in a melanoma patient's tumor dissociate. FMO, a no-secondary control.
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S2 from Intratumoral CD16+ Macrophages Are Associated with Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Metastatic Melanoma Treated with Combination Anti-PD-1 and Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy
C1Q and PD-1 expression on CD16+ macrophages in on treatment biopsies of melanoma patients treated with PD-1 or PD-1+CTLA-4 ICB. Dynamics between pretreatment and early-during treatment biopsies on (a) CD16+ macrophages as a proportion of all macrophages (b) CD16+ C1q+ macrophages as a proportion of all C1q+ macrophages (c) PD-1+ CD16+ macrophages as a proportion of PD-1+ macrophages (d) PD-1+ CD16+ C1q+ macrophages as a proportion of all macrophages (e) C1q+ CD16+ macrophages as a proportion of CD16+ macrophages (f) PD-1+ CD16+ macrophages as a proportion of CD16+ macrophages. (g) Log2 RNA expression of C1qa-c in pretreatment (PRE) and early during treatment (EDT) biopsies of responding and non-responding patients treated with PD-1 or PD-1+CTLA-4 ICB. (h) Flow cytometry analysis of ipilimumab (IgG1) and/or secondary anti-IgG1 binding to CD16+ and CD16- macrophages in a melanoma patient's tumor dissociate. FMO, a no-secondary control.
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S1 from Intratumoral CD16+ Macrophages Are Associated with Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Metastatic Melanoma Treated with Combination Anti-PD-1 and Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy
Representativeness of study participants
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S1 from Intratumoral CD16+ Macrophages Are Associated with Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Metastatic Melanoma Treated with Combination Anti-PD-1 and Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy
Representativeness of study participants
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S2 from Intratumoral CD16+ Macrophages Are Associated with Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Metastatic Melanoma Treated with Combination Anti-PD-1 and Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy
Multiplex immunohistochemical staining protocols.
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S2 from Intratumoral CD16+ Macrophages Are Associated with Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Metastatic Melanoma Treated with Combination Anti-PD-1 and Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy
Multiplex immunohistochemical staining protocols.
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S4 from Intratumoral CD16+ Macrophages Are Associated with Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Metastatic Melanoma Treated with Combination Anti-PD-1 and Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy
Clinical and mIHC data generated within the study.
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S4 from Intratumoral CD16+ Macrophages Are Associated with Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Metastatic Melanoma Treated with Combination Anti-PD-1 and Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy
Clinical and mIHC data generated within the study.
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Tables S1-7 from Clinical Features Associated with Outcomes and Biomarker Analysis of Dabrafenib plus Trametinib Treatment in Patients with BRAF-Mutant Melanoma Brain Metastases
Supplementary Table S1. Representativeness of study participants Supplementary Table S2. Analysis of the intracranial response duration in the COMBI-MB trial. Supplementary Table S3. Analysis of overall survival in the COMBI-MB trial. Supplementary Table S4. Baseline clinical features of the COMBI-BRV trial. Supplementary Table S5. Gene expression score (SingScore) and multiplex immunohistochemical results. Supplementary Table S6. Summary statistics of the linear mixed models utilized to assess the association between protein/pathway expression/score and biopsy sites. Supplementary Table S7. Mutation annotated file of exome sequencing from melanoma biopsies.
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Tables S1-7 from Clinical Features Associated with Outcomes and Biomarker Analysis of Dabrafenib plus Trametinib Treatment in Patients with BRAF-Mutant Melanoma Brain Metastases
Supplementary Table S1. Representativeness of study participants Supplementary Table S2. Analysis of the intracranial response duration in the COMBI-MB trial. Supplementary Table S3. Analysis of overall survival in the COMBI-MB trial. Supplementary Table S4. Baseline clinical features of the COMBI-BRV trial. Supplementary Table S5. Gene expression score (SingScore) and multiplex immunohistochemical results. Supplementary Table S6. Summary statistics of the linear mixed models utilized to assess the association between protein/pathway expression/score and biopsy sites. Supplementary Table S7. Mutation annotated file of exome sequencing from melanoma biopsies.
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S3 from Intratumoral CD16+ Macrophages Are Associated with Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Metastatic Melanoma Treated with Combination Anti-PD-1 and Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy
Differential expression analysis gene list of FACS sorted CD16+ compared to CD16- macrophages from human melanoma dissociates.
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S3 from Intratumoral CD16+ Macrophages Are Associated with Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Metastatic Melanoma Treated with Combination Anti-PD-1 and Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy
Differential expression analysis gene list of FACS sorted CD16+ compared to CD16- macrophages from human melanoma dissociates.
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Data from Intratumoral CD16+ Macrophages Are Associated with Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Metastatic Melanoma Treated with Combination Anti-PD-1 and Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy
Purpose:This study characterizes intratumoral macrophage populations within baseline melanoma biopsies from patients with advanced melanoma who received either anti-PD-1 monotherapy or a combination with anti-CTLA-4. Particularly, FcγRIIIa (CD16)-expressing macrophage densities were investigated for associations with response and progression-free survival.Experimental Design:Patients with advanced melanoma who received either anti-PD-1 monotherapy or combination anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 were retrospectively identified. Macrophage populations were analyzed within baseline melanoma biopsies via multiplex IHC in relation to treatment outcomes.Results:Patients who responded to combination immune checkpoint inhibitor contained higher CD16+ macrophage densities than those who did not respond (196 vs. 7 cells/mm2; P = 0.0041). There was no diffidence in CD16+ macrophage densities in the PD-1 monotherapy-treated patients based on response (118 vs. 89 cells/mm2; P = 0.29). A significantly longer 3-year progression-free survival was observed in combination-treated patients with high intratumoral densities of CD16+ macrophages compared with those with low densities (87% vs. 42%, P = 0.0056, n = 40). No association was observed in anti-PD-1 monotherapy-treated patients (50% vs. 47%, P = 0.4636, n = 50). Melanoma biopsies with high densities of CD16+ macrophages contained upregulated gene expression of critical T-cell recruiting chemokines (CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11).Conclusions:Our data demonstrate that tumor microenvironments enriched with CD16+ macrophages are favorable for response to combination anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 therapy but not anti-PD-1 monotherapy. These data provides a potential biomarker of response for combination immunotherapies in patients with metastatic melanoma.See related commentary by Smithy and Luke, p. 2345
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessData from Intratumoral CD16+ Macrophages Are Associated with Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Metastatic Melanoma Treated with Combination Anti-PD-1 and Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy
Purpose:This study characterizes intratumoral macrophage populations within baseline melanoma biopsies from patients with advanced melanoma who received either anti-PD-1 monotherapy or a combination with anti-CTLA-4. Particularly, FcγRIIIa (CD16)-expressing macrophage densities were investigated for associations with response and progression-free survival.Experimental Design:Patients with advanced melanoma who received either anti-PD-1 monotherapy or combination anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 were retrospectively identified. Macrophage populations were analyzed within baseline melanoma biopsies via multiplex IHC in relation to treatment outcomes.Results:Patients who responded to combination immune checkpoint inhibitor contained higher CD16+ macrophage densities than those who did not respond (196 vs. 7 cells/mm2; P = 0.0041). There was no diffidence in CD16+ macrophage densities in the PD-1 monotherapy-treated patients based on response (118 vs. 89 cells/mm2; P = 0.29). A significantly longer 3-year progression-free survival was observed in combination-treated patients with high intratumoral densities of CD16+ macrophages compared with those with low densities (87% vs. 42%, P = 0.0056, n = 40). No association was observed in anti-PD-1 monotherapy-treated patients (50% vs. 47%, P = 0.4636, n = 50). Melanoma biopsies with high densities of CD16+ macrophages contained upregulated gene expression of critical T-cell recruiting chemokines (CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11).Conclusions:Our data demonstrate that tumor microenvironments enriched with CD16+ macrophages are favorable for response to combination anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 therapy but not anti-PD-1 monotherapy. These data provides a potential biomarker of response for combination immunotherapies in patients with metastatic melanoma.See related commentary by Smithy and Luke, p. 2345
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Data from Clinical Features Associated with Outcomes and Biomarker Analysis of Dabrafenib plus Trametinib Treatment in Patients with BRAF-Mutant Melanoma Brain Metastases
Purpose:This study aimed to identify baseline clinical features associated with the outcomes of patients enrolled in the COMBI-MB phase II study of dabrafenib and trametinib treatment in patients with V600 BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma with melanoma brain metastases (MBM). Exploratory biomarker analysis was also conducted as part of the synergistic COMBI-BRV trial (BRV116521), to identify molecular and immunologic changes associated with dabrafenib in MBMs and extracranial metastases (ECM).Patients and Methods:Post hoc analysis was performed for baseline features of patients (n = 125) enrolled in COMBI-MB. Analyses were performed to identify baseline clinical features associated with intracranial response rate (ICRR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).Exploratory biomarker analysis was performed on biospecimen collected in the COMBI-BRV trial in which patients with BRAF-mutant, resectable MBM were treated with dabrafenib for 10 to 14 days prior to craniotomy. Accessible ECM were resected or biopsied at the time of craniotomy. Biospecimens underwent molecular and immunologic profiling for comparative analyses.Results:In COMBI-MB baseline treatment with corticosteroids was independently associated with lower ICRR [39% vs. 63%; OR, 0.323; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.105–0.996; P = 0.049] and shorter PFS (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.06–3.51; P = 0.031). Additional significant associations identified in the multivariate analysis were improved PFS in patients with a BRAFV600E genotype (HR, 0.565; 95% CI, 0.321–0.996; P = 0.048) and improved OS in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0 (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.25–0.78; P = 0.005).Conclusions:Corticosteroid treatment was associated with reduced ICRR and PFS in COMBI-MB, similar to results with immunotherapy for MBMs. Baseline corticosteroid treatment is a key factor to consider in MBM patient management and clinical trial design/interpretation.
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessData from Clinical Features Associated with Outcomes and Biomarker Analysis of Dabrafenib plus Trametinib Treatment in Patients with BRAF-Mutant Melanoma Brain Metastases
Purpose:This study aimed to identify baseline clinical features associated with the outcomes of patients enrolled in the COMBI-MB phase II study of dabrafenib and trametinib treatment in patients with V600 BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma with melanoma brain metastases (MBM). Exploratory biomarker analysis was also conducted as part of the synergistic COMBI-BRV trial (BRV116521), to identify molecular and immunologic changes associated with dabrafenib in MBMs and extracranial metastases (ECM).Patients and Methods:Post hoc analysis was performed for baseline features of patients (n = 125) enrolled in COMBI-MB. Analyses were performed to identify baseline clinical features associated with intracranial response rate (ICRR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).Exploratory biomarker analysis was performed on biospecimen collected in the COMBI-BRV trial in which patients with BRAF-mutant, resectable MBM were treated with dabrafenib for 10 to 14 days prior to craniotomy. Accessible ECM were resected or biopsied at the time of craniotomy. Biospecimens underwent molecular and immunologic profiling for comparative analyses.Results:In COMBI-MB baseline treatment with corticosteroids was independently associated with lower ICRR [39% vs. 63%; OR, 0.323; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.105–0.996; P = 0.049] and shorter PFS (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.06–3.51; P = 0.031). Additional significant associations identified in the multivariate analysis were improved PFS in patients with a BRAFV600E genotype (HR, 0.565; 95% CI, 0.321–0.996; P = 0.048) and improved OS in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0 (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.25–0.78; P = 0.005).Conclusions:Corticosteroid treatment was associated with reduced ICRR and PFS in COMBI-MB, similar to results with immunotherapy for MBMs. Baseline corticosteroid treatment is a key factor to consider in MBM patient management and clinical trial design/interpretation.