Jay Magaziner

➢ Fragility fracture care remains suboptimal worldwide despite strong evidence supporting timely surgery, orthogeriatric care, early mobilization, unrestricted weight-bearing, and secondary fracture prevention. ➢ International quality standards and registry-based audits have translated this evidence into measurable indicators that improve care in many high-income health-care systems. ➢ Implementation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is limited primarily by health-system constraints, including workforce shortages, delayed presentation, limited infrastructure, and fragmented care pathways, rather than by lack of evidence. ➢ Emerging initiatives demonstrate that evidence-based quality standards can be successfully adapted to local contexts while preserving their core clinical principles. ➢ Orthopaedic surgeons have a central role in leading multidisciplinary care, promoting secondary fracture prevention, and driving quality improvement across the entire fragility fracture pathway. ➢ Future progress depends on strengthening health systems, embedding auditing and certification programs, and implementing context-sensitive quality standards that bridge the gap between evidence and routine.

Pragmatic trials have gained popularity in recent years because of their applicability to practical clinical situations. In contrast to traditional explanatory trials, which are tightly controlled and designed to define the effects of treatments under ideal circumstances, pragmatic trials are intended to reveal differences between established treatments in real-world situations. Although the intention-to-treat principle remains the cornerstone of explanatory trials, it may not reliably identify the treatment effect of greatest relevance in pragmatic trials. The estimand approach to trial design and analysis provides for specification and handling of various important intercurrent events that characterize pragmatic trials and arguably allows clearer definition of the treatment effects of interest for assorted real-world populations. Since pragmatic trials have considerable relevance to orthopaedics, we share the rationale for design and upcoming analysis of the Pulmonary Embolism Prevention after Hip and Knee Replacement Trial using an estimand framework.

Purpose This study evaluates sex differences and predictors of anti-osteoporosis medication (AOM) use following a hip fracture, with a focus on older men who exhibit higher mortality rates post-fracture compared to women over the age of 65. Methods Participants included 151 men and 161 women aged 65 and older with hip fractures. The outcome, AOM use, was assessed at baseline (≤ 22 days of hospitalization) and at 2, 6, and 12 months post-hip fracture. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) modeled sex differences and predictors of AOM use during the year post-fracture in 255 participants with complete baseline data and ≥ 1 follow-up observation. Results Of the 312 participants, only 53 used AOM at baseline, and 35 initiated use during follow-up. In the unadjusted GEE model, AOM use was significantly less likely in men (OR = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22–0.78) compared to women. For both men and women, baseline use of AOM was a significant predictor (OR = 28.3; 95% CI, 5.4–148.0 vs. 41.6; 95% CI, 14.0–123.0). The other significant predictors by sex were osteoporosis diagnosis (OR = 3.19; 95% CI, 1.16–8.77) and minimal alcohol use (OR = 3.26; 95% CI, 1.34–7.94) for women versus age (OR = 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01–1.18) for men. Conclusion In older adults with hip fractures, AOM use is low over the year post-fracture and men are less likely to report AOM use compared to women which has implications for important sex differences in predictors of use. Further research is needed to address overall disparities and sex differences in AOM use.

Falls are the most common cause of injury to older patients, resulting in >3 million emergency room visits per year and 290,000 hip fractures annually in the United States. Orthopaedic surgeons care for the majority of these patients; however, they are rarely involved in the assessment of fall risk and providing prevention strategies. Falls also occur perioperatively (e.g., in patients with arthritis and those undergoing arthroplasty). Preoperatively, up to 40% of patients awaiting joint arthroplasty sustain a fall, and 20% to 40% have a fall postoperatively. Risk factors for falls include intrinsic factors such as age and comorbidities that are not modifiable as well as extrinsic factors, including medication reconciliation, improvement in the environment, and the management of modifiable comorbidities that can be optimized. Simple in-office fall assessment tools are available that can be adapted for the orthopaedic practice and be used to identify patients who would benefit from rehabilitation. Orthopaedic surgeons should incorporate these strategies to improve care and to reduce fall risk and associated adverse events.

Objective: to explore physiotherapists’ perceptions of mechanisms to explain observed variation in early postoperative practice after hip fracture surgery demonstrated in a national audit. Methods: a qualitative semi-structured interview study of 21 physiotherapists working on orthopaedic wards at seven hospitals with different durations of physiotherapy during a recent audit. Thematic analysis of interviews drawing on Normalisation Process Theory to aid interpretation of findings. Results: four themes were identified: achieving protocolised and personalised care; patient and carer engagement; multidisciplinary team engagement across the care continuum and strategies for service improvement. Most expressed variation from protocol was legitimate when driven by what is deemed clinically appropriate for a given patient. This tailored approach was deemed essential to optimise patient and carer engagement. Participants reported inconsistent degrees of engagement from the multidisciplinary team attributing this to competing workload priorities, interpreting ‘postoperative physiotherapy’ as a single professional activity rather than a care delivery approach, plus lack of integration between hospital and community care. All participants recognised changes needed at both structural and process levels to improve their services. Conclusion: physiotherapists highlighted an inherent conflict between their intention to deliver protocolised care and allowing for an individual patient-tailored approach. This conflict has implications for how audit results should be interpreted, how future clinical guidelines are written and how physiotherapists are trained. Physiotherapists also described additional factors explaining variation in practice, which may be addressed through increased engagement of the multidisciplinary team and resources for additional staffing and advanced clinical roles.

Summary This study examines changes in bone density and strength in the spine over the year after hip fracture to see if there are differences in the changes between men and women. Results show losses in the spine that may increase the risk of subsequent vertebral fractures, particularly for women. Purpose Compare changes over the first year post-hip fracture in vertebral bone mineral density (BMD) and compressive strength, measured from quantitative computed tomography (QCT) scans of the spine (T12-L1), between women and men. Methods QCT scans were performed on 37 participants (21 men and 16 women) at 2 and 12 months post-hip fracture as part of an ancillary observational study of hip fracture recovery in older community-dwelling men and women. Vertebral BMD and compressive strength were calculated using VirtuOst® (O.N. Diagnostics, Berkeley, CA). Unpaired t-tests were used to compare men and women with respect to baseline demographics, measurements of BMD and bone strength for the whole vertebra and the cortical and trabecular compartments, and any changes in these parameters between months 2 and 12. Results At 2 months post-fracture, there were no significant sex differences in any measurements of vertebral strength or BMD. Between months 2 and 12, vertebral strength decreased significantly in women (− 3.8%, p < 0.05) but not in men (− 2.3%, p < 0.20), vertebral trabecular BMD decreased similarly in both sexes (− 5.7% women; − 6.0% men), but cortical BMD did not change for either sex. Conclusion Despite the small sample size, these findings suggest that appreciable loss of vertebral trabecular bone can occur for both sexes in the year following hip fracture, which may increase the risk of subsequent vertebral fracture, particularly for women.