Fernanda Goyo Tamanaka
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Fernanda Goyo Tamanaka has a total of 11 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Carlos Eduardo Thomaz
Centro Universitario FEI, Department of Electrical Engineering, Image Processing Laboratory, São Bernardo do Campo, SP, Brazil
3 shared publications - Lucas Pereira Carlini
Department of Electrical Engineering, University College FEI, Av. Humberto de Alencar Castelo Branco, 3972-B, São Bernardo do Campo, São Paulo, Brazil
2 shared publications - Marina Carvalho de Moraes Barros
Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
2 shared publications - Rita de Cássia Xavier Balda
Department of Paediatrics, Federal University of Sao Paulo, R. Botucatu, 740, Sao Paulo, 04024-002, Sao Paulo, Brazil
2 shared publications - Ruth Guinsburg
Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
2 shared publications - Tatiany Marcondes Heiderich
Centro Universitario FEI, Department of Electrical Engineering, Image Processing Laboratory, São Bernardo do Campo, SP, Brazil
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 10 March 2026
- Published by Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul in Revista de Informática Teórica e Aplicada
- Vol. 33 (2) , 123-128
Classifying Synthetic Facial Images:
Through artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, synthetic content is generated, which is an increasingly critical issue for digital security. This paper aims to classify real and synthetic facial images using a state-of-the-art AI model to analyze, both quantitatively and qualitatively, its performance and the most discriminating features across the various data transformations used for this purpose in current literature. In this scenario, the study utilized three public benchmark datasets: two for generating fake images (Stable Diffusion and StyleGAN2) and one for real images (FFHQ), employing the Xception architecture with the Grad-CAM++ viewer. Overall, the results indicate that the central region of the image is the most discriminative one, whereas random cropping produced the worst performance. Future work aims to explore other explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods, as well as other training and validation protocols, such as cross-testing between synthetic databases.
- 10 March 2026
- Published by Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul in Revista de Informática Teórica e Aplicada
- Vol. 33 (2) , 123-128
Open AccessClassifying Synthetic Facial Images:
Through artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, synthetic content is generated, which is an increasingly critical issue for digital security. This paper aims to classify real and synthetic facial images using a state-of-the-art AI model to analyze, both quantitatively and qualitatively, its performance and the most discriminating features across the various data transformations used for this purpose in current literature. In this scenario, the study utilized three public benchmark datasets: two for generating fake images (Stable Diffusion and StyleGAN2) and one for real images (FFHQ), employing the Xception architecture with the Grad-CAM++ viewer. Overall, the results indicate that the central region of the image is the most discriminative one, whereas random cropping produced the worst performance. Future work aims to explore other explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods, as well as other training and validation protocols, such as cross-testing between synthetic databases.
- 7 March 2022
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging & Visualization
- Vol. 11 (3) , 331-340
Neonatal pain assessment: A Kendall analysis between clinical and visually perceived facial features
Newborns feel pain and the more premature they are, the more immature are their pain attenuation system. Facial expression recognition provides a non-invasive method that has been widely used in clinical practice to assess pain in newborns. In this context, this work has performed a qualitative and quantitative assessment between the ranking importance of neonatal facial features proposed by 13 clinical scales commonly cited in the literature and the visual perception of 143 health and non-health professionals on those same features. The degree of similarity between these two ranking approaches was evaluated by Kendall’s correlation. To the clinical scales, the most relevant facial features are the eyes, regions in-between eyebrows and forehead. However, according to the visual perception of the participants when assessing pain on face images, regardless of clinical expertise, the most relevant facial feature is the nose. These qualitative results are statistically supported by the Kendall analyses carried out. Specifically, our results highlight that the neonatal facial features ranked as the most important ones by the clinical scales cannot be considered correlated with the visual perception of the participants, either experts or non-experts. Moreover, all groups of participants have presented high correlated rankings between each other.
- 7 March 2022
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging & Visualization
- Vol. 11 (3) , 331-340
Neonatal pain assessment: A Kendall analysis between clinical and visually perceived facial features
Newborns feel pain and the more premature they are, the more immature are their pain attenuation system. Facial expression recognition provides a non-invasive method that has been widely used in clinical practice to assess pain in newborns. In this context, this work has performed a qualitative and quantitative assessment between the ranking importance of neonatal facial features proposed by 13 clinical scales commonly cited in the literature and the visual perception of 143 health and non-health professionals on those same features. The degree of similarity between these two ranking approaches was evaluated by Kendall’s correlation. To the clinical scales, the most relevant facial features are the eyes, regions in-between eyebrows and forehead. However, according to the visual perception of the participants when assessing pain on face images, regardless of clinical expertise, the most relevant facial feature is the nose. These qualitative results are statistically supported by the Kendall analyses carried out. Specifically, our results highlight that the neonatal facial features ranked as the most important ones by the clinical scales cannot be considered correlated with the visual perception of the participants, either experts or non-experts. Moreover, all groups of participants have presented high correlated rankings between each other.
- 23 February 2021
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 62-76
Neonatal Pain Scales and Human Visual Perception: An Exploratory Analysis Based on Facial Expression Recognition and Eye-Tracking
- 23 February 2021
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 62-76
Neonatal Pain Scales and Human Visual Perception: An Exploratory Analysis Based on Facial Expression Recognition and Eye-Tracking
- Open Access
- 1 January 2019
- Published by Brazilian Journal of Development in Brazilian Journal of Development
- Vol. 5 (11) , 26337-26345
Constructo do processo de aprendizagem dos alunos do curso de administração
Constructo do processo de aprendizagem dos alunos do curso de administração / Construct of the learning process of business students
- 1 January 2019
- Published by Brazilian Journal of Development in Brazilian Journal of Development
- Vol. 5 (11) , 26337-26345
Open AccessConstructo do processo de aprendizagem dos alunos do curso de administração
Constructo do processo de aprendizagem dos alunos do curso de administração / Construct of the learning process of business students