MNMatthias Nobl

Matthias Nobl

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Matthias Nobl has a total of 25 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Long-term Outcomes of PreserFlo MicroShunt versus XEN45 Gel Stent in Open-Angle Glaucoma

    by Matthias Nobl, Sigrid Freissinger, Katrin Rudolph, Efstathios Vounotrypidis, Stefan Kassumeh, Siegfried Priglinger, Marc Julian Mackert

    Purpose To compare two glaucoma drainage devices with subconjunctival filtration (MicroShunt and XEN) for open-angle glaucoma (OAG), with respect to effectiveness and safety. Patients and Methods This is a single center, retrospective, interventional study. In total, 106 eyes of 95 patients with OAG underwent surgery. Of these patients, 51 eyes of 45 patients received a MicroShunt implantation and 55 eyes of 50 patients received an XEN implantation. Failure was defined as an intraocular pressure (IOP) lower than 5 or higher than 17 mmHg at the end of follow-up after 2 years, the need for surgical revision, secondary glaucoma surgery, or loss of light perception. Outcome was rated as complete success or qualified success, depending on whether it was achieved with or without anti-glaucomatous medications. Postoperative complications and interventions were also documented for both groups. Results In the MicroShunt group, mean IOP decreased from 20.6 ± 7.5 mmHg at baseline to 13.0 ± 3.9 mmHg (p < 0.0001) after 2 years. In the XEN group, mean IOP was lowered from 22.5 ± 7.9 mmHg to 13.5 ± 4.2 mmHg (p < 0.0001). In both groups, the mean number of medications was significantly reduced (MicroShunt 2.7 ± 1.2 to 0.9 ± 2.5; p < 0.0001 vs. XEN 3.2 ± 0.9 to 1.1 ± 1.5; p < 0.0001). In regard to success rates, 37% of MicroShunt patients achieved complete success and 57% qualified success at the end of follow-up. In the XEN group, rates were 25 and 45%, respectively. Patient demographics differed between the two groups with respect to age (MicroShunt 72.8 ± 8.7 vs. XEN 67.7 ± 9.0 years; p = 0.002). Postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups. Conclusion Both MicroShunt and XEN are effective in significantly reducing IOP and glaucoma medications in OAG, and with a good safety profile.


  • Das Glaukom: Wissenswertes für die Hausarztpraxis

    by Matthias Nobl, Siegfried Georg Priglinger


  • Measurement of Intraocular Pressure

    by Matthias Nobl, Kaweh Mansouri

  • Open Access

    One-Year Outcomes of PreserfloTM MicroShunt Implantation versus Trabeculectomy for Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma

    by Matthias Nobl, Clara Grün, Stefan Kassumeh, Siegfried Priglinger, Marc J. Mackert

    This retrospective, single-center study evaluates the safety and efficacy of PreserfloTM MicroShunt (MicroShunt) implantations compared to trabeculectomies (TETs) in patients diagnosed with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PEXG). A total of 31 eyes from 28 patients received a MicroShunt implantation, and 29 eyes from 26 patients received a TET. Surgical success was defined as an intraocular pressure (IOP) between 5 mmHg and 17 mmHg at the end of the follow-up period, no need for surgical revisions or secondary glaucoma surgery, and no loss of light perception. In the MicroShunt group, the mean IOP dropped from 20.8 ± 5.9 mmHg at baseline to 12.4 ± 2.8 mmHg (p < 0.0001) after one year. In the TET group, the mean IOP dropped from 22.3 ± 6.5 mmHg to 11.1 ± 3.7 mmHg (p < 0.0001) after 12 months. In both of the groups, the mean number of medications was reduced significantly (MicroShunt from 2.7 ± 1.2 to 0.2 ± 0.7; p < 0.0001 vs. TET from 2.9 ± 1.2 to 0.3 ± 0.9; p < 0.0001). Considering the success rates, 83.9% of the MicroShunt eyes achieved complete success, and 90.3% qualified for success at the end of the follow-up period. In the TET group, the rates were 82.8% and 93.1%, respectively. The postoperative complications were comparable between both groups. In conclusion, the MicroShunt implantation demonstrated non-inferiority regarding its efficacy and safety profile compared to TET in PEXG at a follow-up of one year.


  • Open Access

    One-year outcomes of microshunt implantation in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma

    by Matthias Nobl, Sigrid Freissinger, Stefan Kassumeh, Siegfried Priglinger, Marc J. Mackert

    Purpose: To compare the safety and efficacy of microshunt implantation augmented with Mitomycin C in patients with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PEXG) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods: In this retrospective, single centre, interventional study, 46 eyes of 41 patients with PEXG (20 eyes) and POAG (26 eyes) underwent microshunt implantation. Definition of failure was an intraocular pressure (IOP) lower than 5 or higher than 17mmHg on two consecutive visits, an IOP reduction lower than 20% on two consecutive visits, the need of surgical revisions or reoperations or loss of light perception. Outcome was rated as complete success if achieved without medication, otherwise as qualified success. Furthermore, postoperative complications and interventions were compared between the two groups. Results: Patient demographics were similar, except for older age in the PEXG group (70.9±8.6 versus 77.6±8; p = 0.02). Mean IOP dropped from 21.5±5.8mmHg (PEXG) and 18.2±4.5mmHg (POAG) at baseline to 12.8±3.0mmHg (ppppp = 0.04) and choroidal detachment (p = 0.03) in the PEXG group. Conclusion: Microshunt implantation demonstrated similar efficacy results in PEXG and POAG eyes at a follow-up of 12 months. Higher rates of transient hypotony and choroidal detachment were observed in PEXG eyes.


  • Pigmentdispersionssyndrom

    by Matthias Nobl, Marc Mackert

    Zusammenfassung: Das Pigmentdispersionssyndrom ist eine Erkrankung, die durch Abschilferung von Pigment aus dem Irispigmentepithel und dessen Ablagerung im vorderen Augenabschnitt charakterisiert ist. Typisch ist eine Trias aus Ablagerungen am Hornhautendothel, zirkulären Iristransilluminationen und einer Pigmentierung des Trabekelwerks. Das Spektrum reicht vom einfachen Pigmentdispersionssyndrom bis zum Pigmentdispersionsglaukom mit Optikusatrophie.

  • Pigmentdispersionssyndrom

    by Matthias Nobl, Marc Mackert

    Das Pigmentdispersionssyndrom ist eine Erkrankung, die durch Abschilferung von Pigment aus dem Irispigmentepithel und dessen Ablagerung im vorderen Augenabschnitt charakterisiert ist. Typisch ist eine Trias aus Ablagerungen am Hornhautendothel, zirkulären Iristransilluminationen und einer Pigmentierung des Trabekelwerks. Das Spektrum reicht vom einfachen Pigmentdispersionssyndrom bis zum Pigmentdispersionsglaukom mit Optikusatrophie. Pigment dispersion syndrome (PDS) is a disorder predominantly affecting young, myopic adults. It is characterised by the liberation of pigment of the iris and deposition of it on various structures of the anterior segment leading to multiple specific findings in slit lamp examination. Typical alterations are a deposition of pigment on the central corneal endothelium, circular iris transillumination defects in the mid periphery, a posterior bowing of the iris and increased pigmentation of the trabecular meshwork. Findings are usually bilateral symmetric. Posterior bowing of the iris causes rubbing of the pigmented iris epithelium against lens structures like zonular fibres with a consecutive liberation of pigment. Trabecular meshwork changes because of pigment deposition reduce aqueous outflow facility with the risk of elevated intraocular pressure and glaucoma. Pigmentary glaucoma (PG) is a secondary open angle glaucoma. Treatment of PG is similar to primary open angle glaucoma, including medical therapy, laser therapy and surgery. Peripheral laser iridotomy was shown to change iris configuration but its efficacy in the prevention of PG has not been confirmed in the literature. The purpose of this paper is to summarize information regarding ocular manifestations of PDS to facilitate an early diagnosis and to present a general view of the treatment of PG. Publication Date: 19 April 2021 (online) © 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

    • 1 February 2021
      • Vol. 163  (3) , 47

    [Acute visual loss].

    by Matthias Nobl, Siegfried G Priglinger

  • Pseudoexfoliationssyndrom und Glaukom

    by Matthias Nobl, Marc Mackert

    Zusammenfassung: Das Pseudoexfoliationssyndrom (PEX-Syndrom) ist eine häufige, mit dem Alter zunehmende und weltweit auftretende Erkrankung. Charakteristisch ist die Produktion und Ablagerung von extrazellulärem, fibrillärem Material im Bereich der vorderen Augenkammer. Mit einem breiten Spektrum potenzieller Komplikationen ist die Relevanz sowohl für die konservative als auch die operative Ophthalmologie groß.