Vanessa Morgan
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Vanessa Morgan has a total of 27 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Audrey Sederberg
Georgia Institute of Technology
1 shared publication - Benyuan Liu
School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
1 shared publication - Bibiana Bielekova
Neuroimmunological Diseases Section, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health
1 shared publication - Brenden Tervo-Clemmens
University of Minnesota
1 shared publication - Damien A. Fair
Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
1 shared publication Erendiz Tarakci
Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Precision Confidence Mapping: An approach to determining individualized network topography with limited data
Individualized resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) is increasingly used to guide neuromodulation target selection. However, clinical scans are often short and noisy, and standard pipelines for functional network identification do not provide information about confidence of network assignment. With limited data, unstable network assignments can misdirect stimulation toward off-target regions, making it critical to know which assignments can be trusted. We developed Precision Confidence Mapping (PCM), a bootstrap-based framework that makes this uncertainty explicit and actionable. PCM repeatedly resamples the time series and reruns network detection to estimate how consistently each vertex is assigned to a given network. The resulting confidence maps can be thresholded to exclude less stable regions. We evaluated PCM across scan durations from 5 to 70 minutes using positive predictive value (PPV) as the primary measure of network-assignment precision. PPV quantified the proportion of vertices assigned to a network that received the same label in an independent within-subject 70 minute reference map. Confidence thresholding markedly improved PPV across functional networks, with the largest gains for short scan durations. Compared with standard network assignment, PCM significantly increased agreement with this independent reference. Within-subject agreement remained greater than between-subject agreement, indicating that thresholding preserved individual-specific network topography. These precision gains came with modest reductions in reference-network coverage, particularly at shorter scan durations. This tradeoff may be acceptable for neuromodulation applications that prioritize minimizing off-network assignments. By adding a reliability layer to individualized mapping, PCM supports more cautious and precise neuromodulation targeting under real-world clinical scan constraints.
Open AccessPrecision Confidence Mapping: An approach to determining individualized network topography with limited data
Individualized resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) is increasingly used to guide neuromodulation target selection. However, clinical scans are often short and noisy, and standard pipelines for functional network identification do not provide information about confidence of network assignment. With limited data, unstable network assignments can misdirect stimulation toward off-target regions, making it critical to know which assignments can be trusted. We developed Precision Confidence Mapping (PCM), a bootstrap-based framework that makes this uncertainty explicit and actionable. PCM repeatedly resamples the time series and reruns network detection to estimate how consistently each vertex is assigned to a given network. The resulting confidence maps can be thresholded to exclude less stable regions. We evaluated PCM across scan durations from 5 to 70 minutes using positive predictive value (PPV) as the primary measure of network-assignment precision. PPV quantified the proportion of vertices assigned to a network that received the same label in an independent within-subject 70 minute reference map. Confidence thresholding markedly improved PPV across functional networks, with the largest gains for short scan durations. Compared with standard network assignment, PCM significantly increased agreement with this independent reference. Within-subject agreement remained greater than between-subject agreement, indicating that thresholding preserved individual-specific network topography. These precision gains came with modest reductions in reference-network coverage, particularly at shorter scan durations. This tradeoff may be acceptable for neuromodulation applications that prioritize minimizing off-network assignments. By adding a reliability layer to individualized mapping, PCM supports more cautious and precise neuromodulation targeting under real-world clinical scan constraints.
- Open Access
Power Laws in Empirical Eigenvalue Spectra
The critical brain hypothesis proposes that neural systems operate near a phase transition to optimize information processing. A key method for investigating this hypothesis is the phenomenological renormalization group (pRG), which looks for scale-invariant features across levels of coarse-graining. One such feature is the power-law scaling of eigenvalues of covariance matrices of coarse-grained variables. However, the estimation of this scaling exponent, , often relies on linear regression over arbitrarily selected ranges of the plot of eigenvalues versus rank. This heuristic “eyeballing” introduces uncontrolled bias and complicates the interpretation of observed scaling relationships. In order to obtain a more robust estimation of , we do not fit the standard eigenvalue-vs-rank relationship, but rather the density of eigenvalues, for which standard protocols exist for fitting power laws to empirical data distributions. We demonstrate this approach using a synthetic model that replicates the scaling signatures of neural data while providing control over the system’s exponents as well as neural data obtained from publicly available Neuropixels recordings. We also establish standards for the minimal data required to quantify power-law behavior in a pRG eigenvalue analysis. Our approach contributes a tool for understanding the fundamental limitations imposed by spatial and temporal constraints of experimental datasets, which is required to rigorously assess the neural criticality hypothesis.Open AccessPower Laws in Empirical Eigenvalue Spectra
The critical brain hypothesis proposes that neural systems operate near a phase transition to optimize information processing. A key method for investigating this hypothesis is the phenomenological renormalization group (pRG), which looks for scale-invariant features across levels of coarse-graining. One such feature is the power-law scaling of eigenvalues of covariance matrices of coarse-grained variables. However, the estimation of this scaling exponent, , often relies on linear regression over arbitrarily selected ranges of the plot of eigenvalues versus rank. This heuristic “eyeballing” introduces uncontrolled bias and complicates the interpretation of observed scaling relationships. In order to obtain a more robust estimation of , we do not fit the standard eigenvalue-vs-rank relationship, but rather the density of eigenvalues, for which standard protocols exist for fitting power laws to empirical data distributions. We demonstrate this approach using a synthetic model that replicates the scaling signatures of neural data while providing control over the system’s exponents as well as neural data obtained from publicly available Neuropixels recordings. We also establish standards for the minimal data required to quantify power-law behavior in a pRG eigenvalue analysis. Our approach contributes a tool for understanding the fundamental limitations imposed by spatial and temporal constraints of experimental datasets, which is required to rigorously assess the neural criticality hypothesis. - Open Access
- 24 February 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in npj Digital Medicine
- Vol. 4 (1) , 1-13
Smartphone-based symbol-digit modalities test reliably captures brain damage in multiple sclerosis
As the burden of neurodegenerative diseases increases, time-limited clinic encounters do not allow quantification of complex neurological functions. Patient-collected digital biomarkers may remedy this, if they provide reliable information. However, psychometric properties of digital tools remain largely un-assessed. We developed a smartphone adaptation of the cognitive test, the Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) by randomizing the test’s symbol-number codes and testing sequences. The smartphone SDMT showed comparable psychometric properties in 154 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and 39 healthy volunteers (HV). E.g., smartphone SDMT achieved slightly higher correlations with cognitive subscores of neurological examinations and with brain injury measured by MRI (R2 = 0.75, Rho = 0.83, p < 0.0001) than traditional SDMT. Mathematical adjustment for motoric disability of the dominant hand, measured by another smartphone test, compensates for the disadvantage of touch-based test. Averaging granular home measurements of the digital biomarker also increases accuracy of identifying true neurological decline.
- 24 February 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in npj Digital Medicine
- Vol. 4 (1) , 1-13
Open AccessSmartphone-based symbol-digit modalities test reliably captures brain damage in multiple sclerosis
As the burden of neurodegenerative diseases increases, time-limited clinic encounters do not allow quantification of complex neurological functions. Patient-collected digital biomarkers may remedy this, if they provide reliable information. However, psychometric properties of digital tools remain largely un-assessed. We developed a smartphone adaptation of the cognitive test, the Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) by randomizing the test’s symbol-number codes and testing sequences. The smartphone SDMT showed comparable psychometric properties in 154 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and 39 healthy volunteers (HV). E.g., smartphone SDMT achieved slightly higher correlations with cognitive subscores of neurological examinations and with brain injury measured by MRI (R2 = 0.75, Rho = 0.83, p < 0.0001) than traditional SDMT. Mathematical adjustment for motoric disability of the dominant hand, measured by another smartphone test, compensates for the disadvantage of touch-based test. Averaging granular home measurements of the digital biomarker also increases accuracy of identifying true neurological decline.