Camilla Farolfi

The increasing environmental impacts of conventional agriculture have intensified the search for farming approaches capable of balancing food production, resource efficiency, and ecosystem protection. In this context, multiple sustainability-oriented approaches have emerged, including organic agriculture, integrated production, sustainable agriculture, and regenerative agriculture. This study develops a comparative framework based on a structured literature review covering the period January 2000–March 2026 to assess these approaches from both practice-based and governance perspectives. The analysis examines key environmental management dimensions, alongside governance-related aspects. The results reveal substantial convergence across approaches regarding core environmental practices, including cover cropping, crop diversification, reduced tillage, and input optimisation. However, important differences emerge in system integration, governance structures, and sustainability objectives. Efficiency-oriented approaches mainly prioritise productivity and resource optimisation, whereas regenerative and organic approaches place stronger emphasis on ecosystem restoration and soil health. The study highlights the limitations of current sustainability assessment frameworks and emphasises the need for integrated, outcome-based approaches capable of capturing both environmental impacts and regenerative benefits across agricultural systems.

High-density olive groves, despite their interesting production potential, have several limitations, including their high fruit load and irrigation requirements. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of fruit load and deficit irrigation on oil yield, fruit quality, and olive chemical composition in a high-density olive grove (cv Sikitita). Our main hypothesis was that primary metabolism, as influenced by crop load and stress, could modify the accumulation of different phenolic classes. Different fruit loads were generated through flower thinning (66%, 50%, 33%, 0%), and two deficit irrigation treatments (−60%, −75%) were compared to the well-watered control (920 m³/ha). Thinning treatments had a limited effect on oil yield; on the other hand, deficit irrigation caused considerably less oil accumulation in the fruit on all sampling dates. Thinning 66% and deficit irrigation 75% were considered with the control for untargeted metabolomic analysis, including three sampling dates. A total of 233 distinct phenolic compounds were annotated. Multivariate HCA results indicated that harvest time had an impact on the phenolic profile of olive fruits, obtaining two separated clusters that grouped t1 and t2 together and apart from t3, which clustered independently. Regarding agronomic techniques, they played a differential role in the phenolic profile (supervised OPLS-DA). Fruit load mostly affected flavonoid glycosides. In contrast, the phenolic response to deficit irrigation was more heterogeneous, with phenolic acids (35%), flavonoids (25%), LMW, and other phenols (25%).

High-density olive groves, despite their interesting production potential, have several limitations, also due to the high fruit load and the irrigation requirements.The study aimed to evaluate the effects of fruit load and deficit irrigation on oil yield and fruit quality, and on olive chemical composition in a high-density olive grove (cv Sikitita). Our main hypothesis was that the primary metabolism, as influenced by crop load and stress, could modify the accumulation of different phenolic classes.Different fruit loads were generated through flower thinning (66%, 50%, 33%, 0%) and two deficit irrigation treatments (-60%, -75%) were compared to the well-watered control (920 m3/ha).Thinning treatments had a limited effect on oil yield, on the other hand, deficit irrigation caused considerably less oil accumulation in the fruit on all sampling dates.Thinning 66% and deficit irrigation 75% were considered with the control for untargeted metabolomic analysis, considering three sampling dates. 233 different phenolic compounds were annotated. Multivariate HCA results indicated the impact of harvest time on the phenolic profile of olive fruits, yielding two separate clusters grouping t1 and t2 together and apart from t3. Regarding agronomic techniques, they played a differential role in the phenolic profile (supervised OPLS – DA). Fruit load mostly affected flavonoid glycosides. In contrast, the phenolic response to deficit irrigation is more heterogeneous, with phenolic acids (35%), flavonoids (25%), LMW, and other phenols (25%).

Regulated deficit irrigation in super-high-density (SHD) olive orchards is a well-known strategy to save water and control plant vigor, without decreasing fruit or oil yield. As there is controversial information about its influence on virgin olive oil quality, a trial was conducted in five SHD olive orchards of Arbequina cultivar in different locations of central, east, north and northeast Spain under full irrigation (FI) and regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) treatments. RDI applied during phase II of fruit growing (40% of total needs) saves more than 20% of water on average, without reductions in olive fruit or extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) yield. No threshold of 3.5 MPa of stem water potential was crossed in any case. RDI modified sterols and the fatty acid profile of EVOOs but not phenols, quality parameters, or the sensory profile. Latitude, altitude, and yearly rainfall have a big impact on some compounds such as campesterol, oleuropein, or margaroleic or linolenic acids.

The Italian extra virgin olive oil supply chain has considerable potential for embarking on a path of sustainable development and evolution. In Italy, the great variety heritage and the different pedo-climatic characteristics result in local olive growing systems with different management techniques, producing extra virgin olive oils that are strictly entwined to the territory, with peculiar qualitative properties. Nevertheless, numerous criticalities have been traditionally eroding the competitiveness of Italian olive growing that could find in sustainability certifications, a lasting driver of value creation. Shared standardizations and certifications that include the three pillars of sustainability are therefore necessary for the development of the process.