Afrouz Jabal Ameli
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Afrouz Jabal Ameli has a total of 12 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Fabrizio Grandoni
IDSIA, USI-SUPSI, Lugano, Switzerland
5 shared publications - Miguel Bosch-Calvo
IDSIA USI-SUPSI Switzerland
3 shared publications - Alexander Lindermayr
University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
1 shared publication - Faezeh Motiei
Eindhoven University of Technology
1 shared publication - Felix Hommelsheim
University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
1 shared publication - Krzysztof Sornat
University of Wroc law Wroc law Poland
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 18 September 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Mathematical Programming
- p. 1-20
A PTAS for triangle-free 2-matching
In the Triangle-Free (Simple) 2-Matching problem we are given an undirected graph $$G=(V,E)$$ . Our goal is to compute a maximum-cardinality $$M\subseteq E$$ satisfying the following properties: (1) at most two edges of M are incident on each node (i.e., M is a 2-matching) and (2) M does not induce any triangle. Recently, Hartvigsen [J. Graph Theory 2024] published a complex polynomial-time algorithm for this problem, with a very complex analysis (spanning over 100 pages). This result was originally announced in his Ph.D. thesis from 1984. In this paper we have a fresh look at this problem and present a simple PTAS for it based on local search. Our PTAS exploits the fact that, as long as the current solution is far enough from the optimum, there exists a short augmenting trail (similar to the maximum matching case).- 18 September 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Mathematical Programming
- p. 1-20
Open AccessA PTAS for triangle-free 2-matching
In the Triangle-Free (Simple) 2-Matching problem we are given an undirected graph $$G=(V,E)$$ . Our goal is to compute a maximum-cardinality $$M\subseteq E$$ satisfying the following properties: (1) at most two edges of M are incident on each node (i.e., M is a 2-matching) and (2) M does not induce any triangle. Recently, Hartvigsen [J. Graph Theory 2024] published a complex polynomial-time algorithm for this problem, with a very complex analysis (spanning over 100 pages). This result was originally announced in his Ph.D. thesis from 1984. In this paper we have a fresh look at this problem and present a simple PTAS for it based on local search. Our PTAS exploits the fact that, as long as the current solution is far enough from the optimum, there exists a short augmenting trail (similar to the maximum matching case). - 14 February 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 386-401
On the MST-Ratio: Theoretical Bounds and Complexity of Finding the Maximum
- 14 February 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 386-401
On the MST-Ratio: Theoretical Bounds and Complexity of Finding the Maximum
- Open Access
Learning-Augmented Online Covering Problems
We give a very general and simple framework to incorporate predictions on requests for online covering problems in a rigorous and black-box manner. Our framework turns any online algorithm with competitive ratio $ρ(k, \cdot)$ depending on $k$, the number of arriving requests, into an algorithm with competitive ratio of $ρ(η, \cdot)$, where $η$ is the prediction error. With accurate enough prediction, the resulting competitive ratio breaks through the corresponding worst-case online lower bounds, and smoothly degrades as the prediction error grows. This framework directly applies to a wide range of well-studied online covering problems such as facility location, Steiner problems, set cover, parking permit, etc., and yields improved and novel bounds.Open AccessLearning-Augmented Online Covering Problems
We give a very general and simple framework to incorporate predictions on requests for online covering problems in a rigorous and black-box manner. Our framework turns any online algorithm with competitive ratio $ρ(k, \cdot)$ depending on $k$, the number of arriving requests, into an algorithm with competitive ratio of $ρ(η, \cdot)$, where $η$ is the prediction error. With accurate enough prediction, the resulting competitive ratio breaks through the corresponding worst-case online lower bounds, and smoothly degrades as the prediction error grows. This framework directly applies to a wide range of well-studied online covering problems such as facility location, Steiner problems, set cover, parking permit, etc., and yields improved and novel bounds. - Open Access
- 16 June 2025
- Published by Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe (CCSD) in TheoretiCS
- Vol. ume 4
A $4/3$ Approximation for $2$-Vertex-ConnectivityThe 2-Vertex-Connected Spanning Subgraph problem (2VCSS) is among the most basic NP-hard (Survivable) Network Design problems: we are given an (unweighted) undirected graph $G$. Our goal is to find a spanning subgraph $S$ of $G$ with the minimum number of edges which is $2$-vertex-connected, namely $S$ remains connected after the deletion of an arbitrary node. 2VCSS is well-studied in terms of approximation algorithms, and the current best (polynomial-time) approximation factor is $10/7$ by Heeger and Vygen [SIDMA'17] (improving on earlier results by Khuller and Vishkin [STOC'92] and Garg, Vempala and Singla [SODA'93]). Here we present an improved $4/3$ approximation. Our main technical ingredient is an approximation preserving reduction to a conveniently structured subset of instances which are ``almost'' 3-vertex-connected. The latter reduction might be helpful in future work.Comment: 44 pages. This is the TheoretiCS journal version- 16 June 2025
- Published by Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe (CCSD) in TheoretiCS
- Vol. ume 4
Open AccessA $4/3$ Approximation for $2$-Vertex-ConnectivityThe 2-Vertex-Connected Spanning Subgraph problem (2VCSS) is among the most basic NP-hard (Survivable) Network Design problems: we are given an (unweighted) undirected graph $G$. Our goal is to find a spanning subgraph $S$ of $G$ with the minimum number of edges which is $2$-vertex-connected, namely $S$ remains connected after the deletion of an arbitrary node. 2VCSS is well-studied in terms of approximation algorithms, and the current best (polynomial-time) approximation factor is $10/7$ by Heeger and Vygen [SIDMA'17] (improving on earlier results by Khuller and Vishkin [STOC'92] and Garg, Vempala and Singla [SODA'93]). Here we present an improved $4/3$ approximation. Our main technical ingredient is an approximation preserving reduction to a conveniently structured subset of instances which are ``almost'' 3-vertex-connected. The latter reduction might be helpful in future work.Comment: 44 pages. This is the TheoretiCS journal version - Open Access
- 15 June 2025
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 653-664
A 5/4-Approximation for Two-Edge Connectivity
- 15 June 2025
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 653-664
Open AccessA 5/4-Approximation for Two-Edge Connectivity
- Open Access
- 9 June 2022
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 1598-1611
Breaching the 2-approximation barrier for the forest augmentation problem
The basic goal of survivable network design is to build cheap networks that guarantee the connectivity of certain pairs of nodes despite the failure of a few edges or nodes. A celebrated result by Jain [Combinatorica'01] provides a 2-approximation for a wide class of these problems. However nothing better is known even for very basic special cases, raising the natural question whether any improved approximation factor is possible at all. In this paper we address one of the most basic problems in this family for which 2 is still the best-known approximation factor, the Forest Augmentation Problem (FAP): given an undirected unweighted graph (that w.l.o.g. we can assume to be a forest) and a collection of extra edges (links), compute a minimum cardinality subset of links whose addition to the graph makes it 2-edge-connected. Several better-than-2 approximation algorithms are known for the special case where the input graph is a tree, a.k.a. the Tree Augmentation Problem (TAP), see e.g. [Grandoni, Kalaitzis, Zenklusen - STOC'18; Cecchetto, Traub, Zenklusen - STOC'21] and references therein. Recently this was achieved also for the weighted version of TAP [Traub, Zenklusen - FOCS'21], and for the k-connectivity generalization of TAP [Byrka, Grandoni, Jabal-Ameli - STOC'20; Cecchetto, Traub, Zenklusen - STOC'21]. These results heavily exploit the fact that the input graph is connected, a condition that does not hold in FAP. In this paper we breach the 2-approximation barrier for FAP. Our result is based on two main ingredients. First, we describe a reduction to the Path Augmentation Problem (PAP), the special case of FAP where the input graph is a collection of disjoint paths. Our reduction is not approximation preserving, however it is sufficiently accurate to improve on a factor 2 approximation. Second, we present a better-than-2 approximation algorithm for PAP, an open problem on its own. Here we exploit a novel notion of implicit credits which might turn out to be helpful in future related work.
- 9 June 2022
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 1598-1611
Open AccessBreaching the 2-approximation barrier for the forest augmentation problem
The basic goal of survivable network design is to build cheap networks that guarantee the connectivity of certain pairs of nodes despite the failure of a few edges or nodes. A celebrated result by Jain [Combinatorica'01] provides a 2-approximation for a wide class of these problems. However nothing better is known even for very basic special cases, raising the natural question whether any improved approximation factor is possible at all. In this paper we address one of the most basic problems in this family for which 2 is still the best-known approximation factor, the Forest Augmentation Problem (FAP): given an undirected unweighted graph (that w.l.o.g. we can assume to be a forest) and a collection of extra edges (links), compute a minimum cardinality subset of links whose addition to the graph makes it 2-edge-connected. Several better-than-2 approximation algorithms are known for the special case where the input graph is a tree, a.k.a. the Tree Augmentation Problem (TAP), see e.g. [Grandoni, Kalaitzis, Zenklusen - STOC'18; Cecchetto, Traub, Zenklusen - STOC'21] and references therein. Recently this was achieved also for the weighted version of TAP [Traub, Zenklusen - FOCS'21], and for the k-connectivity generalization of TAP [Byrka, Grandoni, Jabal-Ameli - STOC'20; Cecchetto, Traub, Zenklusen - STOC'21]. These results heavily exploit the fact that the input graph is connected, a condition that does not hold in FAP. In this paper we breach the 2-approximation barrier for FAP. Our result is based on two main ingredients. First, we describe a reduction to the Path Augmentation Problem (PAP), the special case of FAP where the input graph is a collection of disjoint paths. Our reduction is not approximation preserving, however it is sufficiently accurate to improve on a factor 2 approximation. Second, we present a better-than-2 approximation algorithm for PAP, an open problem on its own. Here we exploit a novel notion of implicit credits which might turn out to be helpful in future related work.
- Open Access
- 1 March 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Theory of Computing Systems
- Vol. 65 (6) , 985-1008
On the Cycle Augmentation Problem: Hardness and Approximation Algorithms
In the k-Connectivity Augmentation Problem we are given a k-edge-connected graph and a set of additional edges called links. Our goal is to find a set of links of minimum size whose addition to the graph makes it (k + 1)-edge-connected. There is an approximation preserving reduction from the mentioned problem to the case k = 1 (a.k.a. the Tree Augmentation Problem or TAP) or k = 2 (a.k.a. the Cactus Augmentation Problem or CacAP). While several better-than-2 approximation algorithms are known for TAP, for CacAP only recently this barrier was breached (hence for k-Connectivity Augmentation in general). As a first step towards better approximation algorithms for CacAP, we consider the special case where the input cactus consists of a single cycle, the Cycle Augmentation Problem (CycAP). This apparently simple special case retains part of the hardness of the general case. In particular, we are able to show that it is APX-hard. In this paper we present a combinatorial $\left (\frac {3}{2}+\varepsilon \right )$ 3 2 + ε -approximation for CycAP, for any constant ε > 0. We also present an LP formulation with a matching integrality gap: this might be useful to address the general case of the problem.
- 1 March 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Theory of Computing Systems
- Vol. 65 (6) , 985-1008
Open AccessOn the Cycle Augmentation Problem: Hardness and Approximation Algorithms
In the k-Connectivity Augmentation Problem we are given a k-edge-connected graph and a set of additional edges called links. Our goal is to find a set of links of minimum size whose addition to the graph makes it (k + 1)-edge-connected. There is an approximation preserving reduction from the mentioned problem to the case k = 1 (a.k.a. the Tree Augmentation Problem or TAP) or k = 2 (a.k.a. the Cactus Augmentation Problem or CacAP). While several better-than-2 approximation algorithms are known for TAP, for CacAP only recently this barrier was breached (hence for k-Connectivity Augmentation in general). As a first step towards better approximation algorithms for CacAP, we consider the special case where the input cactus consists of a single cycle, the Cycle Augmentation Problem (CycAP). This apparently simple special case retains part of the hardness of the general case. In particular, we are able to show that it is APX-hard. In this paper we present a combinatorial $\left (\frac {3}{2}+\varepsilon \right )$ 3 2 + ε -approximation for CycAP, for any constant ε > 0. We also present an LP formulation with a matching integrality gap: this might be useful to address the general case of the problem.