Shona McDonald
Research Subjects
Shona McDonald has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Erna van der Westhuizen
Shonaquip Social Enterprise, Cape Town 7800, South Africa
1 shared publication - Leslie Swartz
Academy of Science of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa
1 shared publication - Margi Linegar
Shonaquip Social Enterprise, Cape Town 7800, South Africa
1 shared publication - Zara Trafford
Institute for Life Course Health Research, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 17 June 2021
- Published by Wiley in Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
- Vol. 63 (11) , 1247
Sleep and disabled children and their families: continuing the conversation
- 17 June 2021
- Published by Wiley in Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
- Vol. 63 (11) , 1247
Open AccessSleep and disabled children and their families: continuing the conversation
- Open Access
- 6 March 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 18 (5) , 2655
More Than Just Assistive Devices: How a South African Social Enterprise Supports an Environment of Inclusion
Appropriate assistive technology has the potential to considerably enhance quality of life, access to health and education, and social and economic participation for people with disabilities. Most disabled people in the world live in low- and middle-income countries where access to assistive devices and other support is severely lacking. There is little evidence that describes contextually relevant approaches to meeting these needs, particularly in African countries. We provide a detailed description of a South African organisation which has manufactured mobility and seating devices for children with disabilities since 1992. The Shonaquip Social Enterprise (SSE) also trains and builds capacity among a wide range of stakeholders (caregivers, health workers, educators, government, and communities) to acknowledge and advocate for the wellbeing of disabled children and adults, and works closely with government to strengthen existing service provisions. Using examples from the SSE, we highlight a number of useful principles to consider when trying to provide for the needs of people with disabilities, particularly in low-resource settings. While access to assistive devices is important, devices have limited capacity to improve participation if the broader environment is overly restrictive and stigmatising. Improved access to devices ought to be situated within a range of broader efforts to increase the inclusion and participation of people with disabilities.
- 6 March 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 18 (5) , 2655
Open AccessMore Than Just Assistive Devices: How a South African Social Enterprise Supports an Environment of Inclusion
Appropriate assistive technology has the potential to considerably enhance quality of life, access to health and education, and social and economic participation for people with disabilities. Most disabled people in the world live in low- and middle-income countries where access to assistive devices and other support is severely lacking. There is little evidence that describes contextually relevant approaches to meeting these needs, particularly in African countries. We provide a detailed description of a South African organisation which has manufactured mobility and seating devices for children with disabilities since 1992. The Shonaquip Social Enterprise (SSE) also trains and builds capacity among a wide range of stakeholders (caregivers, health workers, educators, government, and communities) to acknowledge and advocate for the wellbeing of disabled children and adults, and works closely with government to strengthen existing service provisions. Using examples from the SSE, we highlight a number of useful principles to consider when trying to provide for the needs of people with disabilities, particularly in low-resource settings. While access to assistive devices is important, devices have limited capacity to improve participation if the broader environment is overly restrictive and stigmatising. Improved access to devices ought to be situated within a range of broader efforts to increase the inclusion and participation of people with disabilities.