Basil Vrettos

Basil Vrettos

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Basil Vrettos has a total of 19 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Pre-operative planning for reverse shoulder arthroplasty in low-resource centres: A modified Delphi study in South Africa

    by Pududu Archie Rachuene, Pududu Archie Rachuene, Pududu Archie Rachuene, Pududu Archie Rachuene, Roopam Dey, Roopam Dey, Roopam Dey, Roopam Dey, Ntambue Jimmy Kauta, Ntambue Jimmy Kauta, et al.

    Background: Pre-operative planning for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) poses challenges, particularly when dealing with glenoid bone loss. This modified Delphi study aimed to assess expert consensus on RSA planning processes and rationale, specifically targeting low-resourced institutions. Our objective was to offer pre-operative decision-making algorithms tailored for surgeons practising in resource-constrained hospitals with limited access to computed tomography (CT) scans. Methods: A working group generated statements on pre-operative imaging and glenoid of glenoid morphology and intra-operative decision-making. The study was conducted in three stages, with virtual consensus meetings in between. Stages 2 and 3 consisted only of closed questions/statements. The statements with over 70% were considered consensus achieved and those with less than 10% were considered disagreement consensus achieved. Results: Twelve shoulder surgeons participated, with 67% having over five years of experience in shoulder arthroplasty. In the absence of glenoid bone loss, the sole use of plain radiographs for pre-operative planning reached consensus and is recommended by these groups, while 100% advise using CT scans when bone loss is present. Most surgeons (70%) recommend using patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in cases of structural bone loss. Most of the statements on intra-operative decision-making related to component placement and enhancing stability failed to reach consensus. Conclusion: While consensus was achieved on most aspects of pre-operative imaging and planning, technical aspects of surgery lacked consensus. Planning for patients with structural glenoid bone loss necessitates CT scans and planning tools.


  • Open Access

    Surgical management of distal humerus gunshot fractures: descriptive case series

    by Ntambue Kauta, Alasdair Bott, Edgar Tafadzwa Majirija, Jean Pierre Du Plessis, Basil Vrettos, Sithombo Maqungo, Stephen Roche

    Purpose: The purpose of this study was to report our 5 years surgical experience and the rate of neurovascular injury following gunshot fractures of the distal humerus in a in level-1 Trauma Centre in South Africa. Methods: A retrospective case series of 25 consecutive adult gunshot injuries to the distal humerus. Demographic and injury data were extracted from clinical case notes and electronic operative records. Imaging archives were used to classify fractures according to the AO/OTA classification. Results: Twenty-five male patients, with mean age of 32-years-old, sustained gunshot injuries to the distal humerus. Eleven patients had multiple gunshots. Forty-four percent of patients underwent Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA), 20% had confirmed brachial artery injury. Limbs with vascular injury were salvaged with arterial repair and external fixation. Fractures were extra-articular in 20 cases (80%). Nineteen fractures were classified as highly comminuted. Nerve injuries occurred in 52% and were all managed expectantly. Only 32% of patients attended follow-up beyond 3 months. Conclusions: These are rare challenging injuries with high rates of neurovascular damage. This demographic of patients is poorly compliant with follow up highlighting the need for high-quality early care. Brachial artery injury should be excluded with CTA and can be managed with arterial repair and external fixation. All fractures in this series were surgically managed with conventional anatomical plate and screw fixation techniques. For nerve injury, we advocate expectant management. Level of evidence: IV.


  • Open Access

    Assessment and management of shoulder pain at primary care level

    by Ntambue Kauta, Elma De Vries, Jean-Pierre Du Plessis, Ben Grey, Cameron Anley, Basil Vrettos, Robert Dachs, Stephen Roche

    Most patients with shoulder pain will initially visit their community health centre, private general practitioner or family physician, with various levels of experience in the assessment and management of shoulder conditions. Shoulder conditions will range from early, simple ailments that can be treated in the primary care setting, to post-traumatic injuries and complex pathologies requiring the expertise of an orthopaedic surgeon or a fellowship-trained shoulder surgeon. Correct assessment of the patient's shoulder condition at the index consultation is a prerequisite for appropriate management. This article sets out straightforward guidelines to help general practitioners confidently identify the patient's source of shoulder pain and initiate an appropriate management plan at primary care level. Criteria for urgent and elective referral for specialist care are also outlined.


  • Total elbow arthroplasty in bleeding disorders: an additional series of 8 cases

    by Anne J. Vochteloo, Stephen J. Roche, Robert P. Dachs, Basil C. Vrettos


  • Triceps-On vs. Triceps-Off in Total Elbow Arthroplasty

    by Robert P. Dachs, Mark Fleming, Jean-Pierre du Plessis, Basil C. Vrettos, Stephen J.L. Roche