Makino
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Makino has a total of 12 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Chikara Kunisaki
Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
1 shared publication Hidetaka A. Ono
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Kanazawa‐ku, Yokohama, Japan
1 shared publicationHirotoshi Akiyama
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Kanazawa‐ku, Yokohama, Japan
1 shared publication- Itaru Endo
Gastroenterological Surgery Division, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
1 shared publication - Jun Kimura
Department of Earth and Space Science, The University of Osaka, 1-1 Machikaneyama-cho, toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan
1 shared publication Motohiko Tokuhisa
Gastroenterological Center, Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Minami‐ku, Yokohama, Japan
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 14 July 2010
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 102 (2) , 141-147
Effect of obesity on laparoscopy‐assisted distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer
Background and Objectives This study compared surgical outcomes between patients undergoing laparoscopy‐assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) and those undergoing open distal gastrectomy (ODG) from the viewpoint of obesity. Methods Between June 2002 and May 2008, 146 patients with preoperatively diagnosed early gastric cancer who underwent LADG (n = 90) or ODG (n = 56) were enrolled in this study and compared in terms of clinicopathological findings and operative outcome. The visceral fat area (VFA) and subcutaneous fat area (SFA) were assessed as identifiers of obesity using FatScan software. The relationship between obesity and operative outcomes after LADG and ODG was evaluated. Results There were no significant correlations between intraoperative blood loss (IBL) and any obesity‐related factors, or between operation time (OT) and any obesity‐related factors in the LADG group. There was a significant correlation between IBL and BMI (r = 0.486, P = 0.0001), IBL and VFA (r = 0.456, P = 0.0003), IBL and SFA (r = 0.311, P = 0.0193), OT and BMI (r = 0.406, P = 0.0017), OT and VFA (r = 0.314, P = 0.0178), and between OT and SFA (r = 0.382, P = 0.0034) in the ODG group. Conclusions LADG may be a useful operative manipulation that is not influenced by obesity, whereas ODG may be influenced by obesity even after reaching the surgical plateau. J. Surg. Oncol. 2010;102:141–147.
- 14 July 2010
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 102 (2) , 141-147
Effect of obesity on laparoscopy‐assisted distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer
Background and Objectives This study compared surgical outcomes between patients undergoing laparoscopy‐assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) and those undergoing open distal gastrectomy (ODG) from the viewpoint of obesity. Methods Between June 2002 and May 2008, 146 patients with preoperatively diagnosed early gastric cancer who underwent LADG (n = 90) or ODG (n = 56) were enrolled in this study and compared in terms of clinicopathological findings and operative outcome. The visceral fat area (VFA) and subcutaneous fat area (SFA) were assessed as identifiers of obesity using FatScan software. The relationship between obesity and operative outcomes after LADG and ODG was evaluated. Results There were no significant correlations between intraoperative blood loss (IBL) and any obesity‐related factors, or between operation time (OT) and any obesity‐related factors in the LADG group. There was a significant correlation between IBL and BMI (r = 0.486, P = 0.0001), IBL and VFA (r = 0.456, P = 0.0003), IBL and SFA (r = 0.311, P = 0.0193), OT and BMI (r = 0.406, P = 0.0017), OT and VFA (r = 0.314, P = 0.0178), and between OT and SFA (r = 0.382, P = 0.0034) in the ODG group. Conclusions LADG may be a useful operative manipulation that is not influenced by obesity, whereas ODG may be influenced by obesity even after reaching the surgical plateau. J. Surg. Oncol. 2010;102:141–147.