LELuisa Egen

Luisa Egen

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Luisa Egen has a total of 78 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski

    Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty of the University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany

    6 shared publications
  • Allison Quan

    Department of Urology and Urosurgery, Medical Faculty, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim at Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany

    3 shared publications
  • Maurice Stephan Michel

    Department of Urology and Urosurgery, Medical Faculty, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim at Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany

    3 shared publications
  • Britta Grüne

    Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany

    2 shared publications
  • Caelan Max Haney

    Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany

    2 shared publications
  • Christopher Netsch

    Department of Urology, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, 22307 Hamburg, Germany

    2 shared publications

Latest Publications

  • 5/6 Nephrectomy Using Sharp Bipolectomy Via Midline Laparotomy in Rats

    by Alexander Studier-Fischer, Berkin Özdemir, Caelan Max Haney, Luisa Egen, Maurice Stephan Michel, Niklas Westhoff, Markus Mieth, Zoltan Czigany, Gabriel Alexander Salg, Henrik Nienhüser, et al.

    Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects over 10% of the global population, amounting to more than 800 million individuals worldwide. The advances in the treatment of CKD have had a significant impact on patient outcomes. While in the past, CKD was often considered a death sentence, with many patients succumbing to the complications of end-stage renal disease, it is now increasingly being managed as a chronic condition with the availability of dialysis and kidney transplantation, as well as new pharmaceutical developments such as SGLT2 inhibitors or nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Yet, there continues to be a growing demand for further exploration into the pathophysiological processes and potential therapeutic interventions. Reliable biological models play a crucial role in facilitating this research. Given the multifaceted nature of renal disease, which encompasses not only cell biology but also vascular microanatomy and endocrine signaling, an appropriate model must possess a level of biological complexity that only an animal model can offer, rendering rodents an obvious choice. This manuscript, therefore, provides an intricate, systematic protocol for surgically reducing renal parenchyma through midline laparotomy and combined total and partial nephrectomy in rats for survival as well as non-survival applications. It emphasizes the critical role of precise surgical techniques in ensuring consistent and reliable outcomes. Prime examples of potential applications for this model include biomolecular and pharmaceutical studies as well as the development of innovative intraoperative imaging modalities, such as hyperspectral imaging, to objectively visualize and differentiate renal malperfusion.

  • Open Access

    Tranexamic acid reduces perioperative blood transfusions following open radical cystectomy – a propensity-score matched analysis

    by Luisa Egen, Karoline Keller, Hanna Saskia Menold, Allison Quan, Carl-Erik Dempfle, Jochen Johannes Schoettler, Frederik Wessels, Benjamin Meister, Thomas Stefan Worst, Niklas Westhoff, et al.

    Purpose: Radical cystectomy is associated with bleeding and high transfusion rates, presenting challenges in patient management. This study investigated the prophylactic use of tranexamic acid during radical cystectomy. Methods: All consecutive patients treated with radical cystectomy at a tertiary care university center were included from a prospectively maintained database. After an institutional change in the cystectomy protocol patients received 1 g of intravenous bolus of tranexamic acid as prophylaxis. To prevent bias, propensity score matching was applied, accounting for differences in preoperative hemoglobin, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, tumor stage, and surgeon experience. Key outcomes included transfusion rates, complications, and occurrence of venous thromboembolism. Results: In total, 420 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 35 received tranexamic acid. After propensity score matching, 32 patients and 32 controls were matched with regard to clinicopathologic characteristics. Tranexamic acid significantly reduced the number of patients who received transfusions compared to controls (19% [95%-Confidence interval = 8.3; 37.1] vs. 47% [29.8; 64.8]; p = 0.033). Intraoperative and postoperative transfusion rates were lower with tranexamic acid, though not statistically significant (6% [1.5; 23.2] vs. 19% [8.3; 37.1], and 16% [6.3; 33.7] vs. 38% [21.9; 56.1]; p = 0.257 and p = 0.089, respectively). The occurrence of venous thromboembolism did not differ significantly between the groups (9% [2.9; 26.7] vs. 3% [0.4; 20.9]; p = 0.606). Conclusion: Prophylactic tranexamic administration, using a simplified preoperative dosing regimen of 1 g as a bolus, significantly lowered the rate of blood transfusion after cystectomy. This exploratory study indicates the potential of tranexamic acid in enhancing outcomes of open radical cystectomy.


  • Open Access

    The long-term learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in the en-bloc technique: a single surgeon series of 500 consecutive cases

    by M. J. Wenk, F. O. Hartung, L. Egen, C. Netsch, M. Kosiba, B. Grüne, Jonas Herrmann

    Purpose: To evaluate perioperative parameters, clinical outcomes, and the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) of a single surgeon in 500 consecutive cases. Methods: Demographic parameters, outcomes, and adverse events were evaluated. The learning curve for HoLEP in en-bloc technique of the first 500 consecutive patients was analyzed in clusters of 100 (clusters 1–5) using the Wilcoxen rank test, Chi² test and Kruskal Wallis test. Results: Enucleation weight was similar in the clusters 1,2,3, and 5 (62 g, 63 g, 61 g, 61 g), in cluster 4 it was slightly higher at 73 g. There was a significant reduction in operating time from 67 min (cluster 1) to 57 min (cluster 2), 46 min (cluster 3), 53 min (cluster 4), and 43 min (cluster 5), p < 0.001. Enucleation efficiency (g/min) showed a steady increase (1.72, 2.24, 2.79, 2.92 vs. 2.99, p < 0.001). Laser energy efficiency also improved (2.17 vs. 2.12 vs. 1.71 vs. 1.65 vs. 1.55; p < 0.001). There was no measurable learning curve regarding the length of hospital stay (mean 2.5 days), catheterization time (1.9 days), hemoglobin drop (approx. 1 g/dl) or complications (p > 0.1). Conclusions: HoLEP using the en-bloc technique is a safe and highly effective method. Over time, a slight but steady learning curve and improvement in operation time, enucleation efficiency and laser energy efficiency were shown even for an experienced surgeon - after 500 cases, still no plateau was reached. There was no measurable learning curve regarding blood loss, complications, length of hospital stay, and catheterization time.


  • Perioperative Outcomes and Complication Rates in Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Patients After Prior Prostate Biopsy—Does It Really Make a Difference? A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

    by Friedrich Otto Hartung, Luisa Egen, Britta Grüne, Christopher Netsch, Paul Patroi, Maximilian Christian Kriegmair, Jost von Hardenberg, Marie-Claire Rassweiler-Seyfried, Maurice Stephan Michel, Maren Julianne Wenk, et al.

    Prior to holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) many patients have undergone short-term prostate biopsy (PB) to rule out the presence of prostate cancer. The aim of this study is to determine whether a short-term PB prior to HoLEP has an impact on the perioperative outcomes or complications of HoLEP. 734 consecutive patients treated with HoLEP at a tertiary care university hospital between January 2021 and July 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. Patients who had PB within 6 months before HoLEP were matched to patients who underwent PB more than 6 months or had no PB prior to HoLEP using propensity score matching (PSM) based on age, prostate volume (PV), prostate specific antigen (PSA), preoperative urinary tract infection (UTI) and surgeon. Perioperative parameters, such as operation time (OT), enucleation efficiency (EF), as well as complications according to the Satava classification, the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) were evaluated. A total of 206 patients were matched. Age, PV, PSA, as well as the presence of a preoperative UTI, and surgeons did not differ significantly between both groups after PSM. There were no significant differences in mean OT (75 vs. 81 min, p = 0.28) and EF (2.13 vs. 2.13 g/min, p = 0.99). No differences were noted regarding intraoperative (16 vs. 25, p = 0.16), or postoperative complications graded by CDC (p = 0.53) and CCI (p = 0.92). PB within 6 months preoperatively before HoLEP showed no effect on perioperative outcomes, or intra- and postoperative complications.


  • Relevance of Positive Surgical Margins in Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma After Surgical Resection: Predictive Factors and Survival Implications

    by Luisa Egen, Allison Quan, Luise Ingvelde Monika Gottstein, Caelan Max Haney, Margarete Teresa Walach, Julia Mühlbauer, Thomas Stefan Worst, Maurice Stephan Michel, Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski


  • Biophotonics—Intraoperative Guidance During Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    by Luisa Egen, Greta S. Demmel, Maurizio Grilli, Alexander Studier-Fischer, Felix Nickel, Caelan M. Haney, Julia Mühlbauer, Friedrich O. Hartung, Hanna S. Menold, Pietro Piazza, et al.


  • Open Access

    Maximizing efficiency and ensuring safety: Exploring the outcomes of 2 consecutive open radical cystectomies by the same team within a single surgical day

    by Luisa Egen, Frederik Wessels, Allison Quan, Niklas Westhoff, Maximilian Christian Kriegmair, Patrick Honeck, Maurice Stephan Michel, Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski


  • Open Access

    Framework for a living systematic review and meta-analysis for the surgical treatment of bladder cancer: introducing EVIglance to urology

    by Victoria L.S. Wieland, Daniel Uysal, Pascal Md Probst, Maurizio Mlis Grilli, Caelán M. Haney, Marie A. Sidoti Abate, Luisa Egen, Manuel Neuberger, Giovanni E. Md Cacciamani, Maximilian C. Kriegmair, et al.

    Background: Knowledge of current and ongoing studies is critical for identifying research gaps and enabling evidence-based decisions for individualized treatment. However, the increasing number of scientific publications poses challenges for healthcare providers and patients in all medical fields to stay updated with the latest evidence. To overcome these barriers, we aim to develop a living systematic review and open-access online evidence map of surgical therapy for bladder cancer (BC), including meta-analyses. Methods: Following the guidelines provided in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement, a systematic literature search on uro-oncological therapy in BC will be performed across various literature databases. Within the scope of a meta-analysis and living systematic review, relevant randomized controlled trials will be identified. Data extraction and quantitative analysis will be conducted, along with a critical appraisal of the quality and risk of bias of each study. The available research evidence will be entered into an open-access framework (www.evidencemap.surgery) and will also be accessible via the EVIglance app. Regular semi-automatic updates will enable the implementation of a real-living review concept and facilitate resource-efficient screening. Discussion: A regularly updated evidence map provides professionals and patients with an open-access knowledge base on the current state of research, allowing for decision-making based on recent evidence. It will help identify an oversupply of evidence, thus avoiding redundant work. Furthermore, by identifying research gaps, new hypotheses can be formulated more precisely, enabling planning, determination of sample size, and definition of endpoints for future trials.


  • Open Access

    Artificial intelligence for renal cancer: From imaging to histology and beyond

    by Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski, Luisa Egen, Chanel E. Fischetti, Stefano Puliatti, Gomez Rivas Juan, Mark Taratkin, Rivero Belenchon Ines, Marie Angela Sidoti Abate, Julia Mühlbauer, Frederik Wessels, et al.


  • Open Access

    Radiomics in Renal Cell Carcinoma—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    by Julia Mühlbauer, Luisa Egen, Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski, Maurizio Grilli, Margarete T. Walach, Niklas Westhoff, Philipp Nuhn, Fabian C. Laqua, Bettina Baessler, Maximilian C. Kriegmair

    Radiomics may increase the diagnostic accuracy of medical imaging for localized and metastatic RCC (mRCC). A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Doing so, we comprehensively searched literature databases until May 2020. Studies investigating the diagnostic value of radiomics in differentiation of localized renal tumors and assessment of treatment response to ST in mRCC were included and assessed with respect to their quality using the radiomics quality score (RQS). A total of 113 out of 1098 identified studies met the criteria and were included in qualitative synthesis. Median RQS of all studies was 13.9% (5.0 points, IQR 0.25–7.0 points), and RQS increased over time. Thirty studies were included into the quantitative synthesis: For distinguishing angiomyolipoma, oncocytoma or unspecified benign tumors from RCC, the random effects model showed a log odds ratio (OR) of 2.89 (95%-CI 2.40–3.39, p < 0.001), 3.08 (95%-CI 2.09–4.06, p < 0.001) and 3.57 (95%-CI 2.69–4.45, p < 0.001), respectively. For the general discrimination of benign tumors from RCC log OR was 3.17 (95%-CI 2.73–3.62, p < 0.001). Inhomogeneity of the available studies assessing treatment response in mRCC prevented any meaningful meta-analysis. The application of radiomics seems promising for discrimination of renal tumor dignity. Shared data and open science may assist in improving reproducibility of future studies.