VDVinciane Dideberg

Vinciane Dideberg

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Vinciane Dideberg has a total of 70 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Homozygous Pathogenic MYH3 Variants Associated With Arthrogryposis and Lingual Dystonia

    by Charlotte Mouraux, Claire Fouquet, Keith Durkin, Vinciane Dideberg, Saskia Bulk, David Aktan, Maria Artesi, Frédérique Depierreux

    Introduction: Heterozygous pathogenic variants in MYH3 are known to be responsible for distal arthrogryposis. Case report: We report a consanguineous family of four children with two likely pathogenic MYH3 homozygous variants associated with complex movement disorders, especially prominent lingual dystonia, along with skeletal abnormalities. The two variants in MYH3 (c.3445G>A and c.4760T>C) have already been described in patients with congenital arthrogryposis. No other significant variation was found using long-read whole genome sequencing. Discussion: We have extended the phenotype of MYH3-associated arthrogryposis to include movement disorders, which may have been underdiagnosed to date. Highlights This article extends the phenotype of MYH3-associated arthrogryposis to include movement disorders, illustrating a family of four children presenting MYH3 skeletal disorders and lingual dystonia. Two homozygous likely pathogenic variants have been identified in the four sibs and appear to be causative for both skeletal and neurological phenotypes.


  • Open Access

    Population-based, first-tier genomic newborn screening in the maternity ward

    by François Boemer, Kristine Hovhannesyan, Flavia Piazzon, Frédéric Minner, Myriam Mni, Valérie Jacquemin, Davood Mashhadizadeh, Noor Benmhammed, Vincent Bours, Adeline Jacquinet, et al.

    The rapid development of therapies for severe and rare genetic conditions underlines the need to incorporate first-tier genetic testing into newborn screening (NBS) programs. A workflow was developed to screen newborns for 165 treatable pediatric disorders by deep sequencing of regions of interest in 405 genes. The prospective observational BabyDetect pilot project was launched in September 2022 in a maternity ward of a public hospital in the Liege area, Belgium. In this ongoing observational study, 4,260 families have been informed of the project, and 3,847 consented to participate. To date, 71 disease cases have been identified, 30 of which were not detected by conventional NBS. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency was the most frequent disorder detected, with 44 positive individuals. Of the remaining 27 cases, 17 were recessive disorders. We also identified one false-positive case in a newborn in whom two variants in the AGXT gene were identified, which were subsequently shown to be located on the maternal allele. Nine heterozygous variants were identified in genes associated with dominant conditions. Results from the BabyDetect project demonstrate the importance of integrating biochemical and genomic methods in NBS programs. Challenges must be addressed in variant interpretation within a presymptomatic population and in result reporting and diagnostic confirmation.


  • Open Access

    Frequency of Participation in External Quality Assessment Programs Focused on Rare Diseases: Belgian Guidelines for Human Genetics Centers

    by Joséphine Lantoine, Anne Brysse, Vinciane Dideberg, Kathleen Claes, Sofie Symoens, Wim Coucke, Valérie Benoit, Sonia Rombout, Martine De Rycke, Sara Seneca, et al.

    Background: Participation in quality controls, also called external quality assessment (EQA) schemes, is required for the ISO15189 accreditation of the Medical Centers of Human Genetics. However, directives on the minimal frequency of participation in genetic quality control schemes are lacking or too heterogeneous, with a possible impact on health care quality. Objective: The aim of this project is to develop Belgian guidelines on the frequency of participation in quality controls for genetic testing in the context of rare diseases. Methods: A group of experts analyzed 90 EQA schemes offered by accredited providers and focused on analyses used for the diagnosis of rare diseases. On that basis, the experts developed practical recommendations about the minimal frequencies of participation of the Medical Centers of Human Genetics in quality controls and how to deal with poor performances and change management. These guidelines were submitted to the Belgian Accreditation Body and then reviewed and approved by the Belgian College of Human Genetics and Rare Diseases and by the National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance. Results: The guidelines offer a decisional algorithm for the minimal frequency of participation in human genetics EQA schemes. This algorithm has been developed taking into account the scopes of the EQA schemes, the levels of experience, and the annual volumes of the Centers of Human Genetics in the performance of the tests considered. They include three key principles: (1) the recommended annual assessment of all genetic techniques and technological platforms, if possible through EQAs covering the technique, genotyping, and clinical interpretation; (2) the triennial assessment of the genotyping and interpretation of specific germline mutations and pharmacogenomics analyses; and (3) the documentation of actions undertaken in the case of poor performances and the participation to quality control the following year. The use of a Bayesian statistical model has been proposed to help the Centers of Human Genetics to determine the theoretical number of tests that should be annually performed to achieve a certain threshold of performance (eg, a maximal error rate of 1%). Besides, the guidelines insist on the role and responsibility of the national public health authorities in the follow-up of the quality of analyses performed by the Medical Centers of Human Genetics and in demonstrating the cost-effectiveness and rationalization of participation frequency in these quality controls. Conclusions: These guidelines have been developed based on the analysis of a large panel of EQA schemes and data collected from the Belgian Medical Centers of Human Genetics. They are applicable to other countries and will facilitate and improve the quality management and financing systems of the Medical Centers of Human Genetics.


  • Open Access

    Frequency of Participation in External Quality Assessment Programs Focused on Rare Diseases: Belgian Guidelines for Human Genetics Centers (Preprint)

    by Joséphine Lantoine, Anne Brysse, Vinciane Dideberg, Kathleen Claes, Sofie Symoens, Wim Coucke, Valérie Benoit, Sonia Rombout, Martine De Rycke, Sara Seneca, et al.

    BACKGROUND Participation in quality controls, also called external quality assessment (EQA) schemes, is required for the ISO15189 accreditation of the Medical Centers of Human Genetics. However, directives on the minimal frequency of participation in genetic quality control schemes are lacking or too heterogeneous, with a possible impact on health care quality. OBJECTIVE The aim of this project is to develop Belgian guidelines on the frequency of participation in quality controls for genetic testing in the context of rare diseases. METHODS A group of experts analyzed 90 EQA schemes offered by accredited providers and focused on analyses used for the diagnosis of rare diseases. On that basis, the experts developed practical recommendations about the minimal frequencies of participation of the Medical Centers of Human Genetics in quality controls and how to deal with poor performances and change management. These guidelines were submitted to the Belgian Accreditation Body and then reviewed and approved by the Belgian College of Human Genetics and Rare Diseases and by the National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance. RESULTS The guidelines offer a decisional algorithm for the minimal frequency of participation in human genetics EQA schemes. This algorithm has been developed taking into account the scopes of the EQA schemes, the levels of experience, and the annual volumes of the Centers of Human Genetics in the performance of the tests considered. They include three key principles: (1) the recommended annual assessment of all genetic techniques and technological platforms, if possible through EQAs covering the technique, genotyping, and clinical interpretation; (2) the triennial assessment of the genotyping and interpretation of specific germline mutations and pharmacogenomics analyses; and (3) the documentation of actions undertaken in the case of poor performances and the participation to quality control the following year. The use of a Bayesian statistical model has been proposed to help the Centers of Human Genetics to determine the theoretical number of tests that should be annually performed to achieve a certain threshold of performance (eg, a maximal error rate of 1%). Besides, the guidelines insist on the role and responsibility of the national public health authorities in the follow-up of the quality of analyses performed by the Medical Centers of Human Genetics and in demonstrating the cost-effectiveness and rationalization of participation frequency in these quality controls. CONCLUSIONS These guidelines have been developed based on the analysis of a large panel of EQA schemes and data collected from the Belgian Medical Centers of Human Genetics. They are applicable to other countries and will facilitate and improve the quality management and financing systems of the Medical Centers of Human Genetics.