Kwangrae Cho

(1) Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory condition known for its symptoms of joint damage and cartilage breakdown. Current treatments frequently result in adverse effects and show restricted efficacy in the long term. Dendropanax morbiferus, a plant recognized for its bioactive properties, demonstrates promise in the treatment of inflammatory conditions. The objective of this study was to examine the therapeutic properties of Dendropanax morbiferus Lév. water extract (DMWE) in RA through the utilization of in vitro and in vivo models. (2) Methods: Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) analysis was used to identify bioactive compounds in DMWE. Antioxidant activity was evaluated using 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt (ABTS) radical-scavenging assays. The in vitro experiments involved the treatment of CHON-001 cells with DMWE in order to assess its impacts on inflammation and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) expression. The impact of DMWE on the Janus Kinase 2 (JAK2) and Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT) signaling pathways was also assessed. RA was induced in Balb/c mice who were subsequently treated with varying doses of DMWE to assess its impact on joint morphology, edema, and body weight. (3) Results: DMWE demonstrated substantial antioxidant activity and hindered the expression of MMP-2 and MMP-8 in chondrocytes treated with IL-1β. It additionally inhibited the JAK2/STAT pathway and diminished inflammatory responses. Treatment with DMWE in living organisms led to a decrease in joint swelling, improved weight regains, and maintained joint structure, with higher doses exhibiting effects similar to those of the positive control, dexamethasone (Dexa). (4) Conclusions: DMWE was found to have excellent in vitro antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities. In an RA-induced mouse model, DMWE-3 (500 mg/kg BW) was found to effectively treat RA by reducing the concentration of pro-inflammatory factors and preventing joint deformation.

Kwangrae Cho, Myoung-hun Kim, Wonjin Lee, Jeong Han Lee, Se Hun Lim, Kun Moo Lee, Young-Jae Kim, Jong Han Kim, Deul-nyuck Choi, and Ho-young Chang. Anesth Pain Med 2016;11:104-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.17085/apm.2016.11.1.104

The main disadvantage of rocuronium is the pain associated with vascular injection. We evaluated the efficacy of palonosetron for reducing pain after rocuronium injection. Eighty patients scheduled for elective surgery were randomly divided into two groups: Group C (normal saline 1.5 ml, n = 40) and Group P (palonosetron 0.075 mg, n = 40). Anesthesia was induced with thiopental 5 mg/kg and the test drug was injected over 10 seconds. Thirty seconds after the injection of the test drug, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg was injected over 30 seconds and the response was recorded. Injection pain was graded using a 4-point scale. The grade was 0 points for no movement, 1 point for wrist movement, 2 points for elbow or shoulder movement, and 3 points for whole body movement. Mean arterial pressure and heart rate were recorded on arrival in the operating room and before and 30 seconds after rocuronim injection. There was no significant difference in the grade 1 response between the two groups; however, the grade 2 and 3 responses in Group P were 5 (12.5%) and 4 (10%), respectively, which were significantly lower than in Group C, with 13 (32.5%) responses for each grade. There were no significant differences in hemodynamic changes within each group. However, the difference in mean arterial pressure before and after the injection of rocuronium was significantly larger in Group C compared to Group P. Pretreatment with palonosetron 0.075 mg reduced the incidence and severity of withdrawal movement after rocuronium administration.